re: “Due process” for deportations is as ridiculous as squatters rights.

Aw look at the ms-13 blow job alter.

Yes, immigration court is administrative…but it’s still part of the U.S. legal system, dummy, and its rulings are legally binding. In Garcia’s case, a judge granted him withholding of removal in 2019, which isn’t the same as asylum but still offers legal protection from deportation to a specific country—in this case, El Salvador. Ya big dummy.

It doesn’t matter how many removal orders existed before that, stupid. Once the judge issued that protection, deporting him to El Salvador became a violation of U.S. law unless that ruling was formally overturned through proper legal channels, idiot. It wasn’t.

Calling it “temporary” doesn’t change the fact that a court ruling was on the books, ya big lummox, and DHS broke it. That’s the issue, dotard.

You don’t have to like Garcia or sympathize with him. But facts > feelings. And the facts say a legal order was ignored.

Idiot.

“Improper” isn’t a softer version of illegal, it is illegal when it violates a standing federal court order. That’s not a gray area. A judge ruled Garcia could not be sent to El Salvador, and ICE did it anyway. That’s a direct violation of U.S. immigration law and judicial authority And what a weird thing to say.

quote:

---

Yes, immigration court is administrative…but it’s still part of the U.S. legal system, dummy, and its rulings are legally binding. In Garcia’s case, a judge granted him withholding of removal in 2019, which isn’t the same as asylum but still offers legal protection from deportation to a specific country—in this case, El Salvador. Ya big dummy.

---

Yep. Which is why I said deporting him to El Salvador was improper. Did you miss that? Yikes.

quote:

---

It doesn’t matter how many removal orders existed before that, stupid. Once the judge issued that protection, deporting him to El Salvador became a violation of U.S. law unless that ruling was formally overturned through proper legal channels, idiot. It wasn’t.

---

Oops. Now what?

quote:

---

Calling it “temporary” doesn’t change the fact that a court ruling was on the books, ya big lummox, and DHS broke it. That’s the issue, dotard.

---

Does the Secretary of State have the discretion to to remove someone? Yes or no? Dummy.

quote:

---

You don’t have to like Garcia or sympathize with him. But facts > feelings. And the facts say a legal order was ignored.

---

Of the two of us…one has represented an illegal in Immigration court.

You are a complete moron

quote:

---

Improper” isn’t a softer version of illegal, it is illegal

---

Only a complete moron would say this. Words have meaning. If I file a motion and the court says it was improper, did I do something illegal? Of course not you dumb idiot.

quote:

---

That’s a direct violation of U.S. immigration law

---

Hmmm. Was opening the border also a direct violation of US immigration law? You dumb frick.

quote:

---

Again, don’t pretend like you care about the law.

---

Well, I would say to you, “don’t pretend like you care about the law.”

I also would say, “get fricked.”

quote:

---

The immigration and district court rulings may have very well been farcical. Based on the district judges actions and written statements since then I think it’s clear that it was.

---

I think that’s a wrap.

quote:

---

This administration needs to play the game and win.

---

They did. They deported this shitstain before anyone could do anything about it. You can say it’s farcical. I’ll agree. And they won.

Put on your pussy hat and get to protesting this terrible injustice. Tell the world you want third world gang members here.

Just being a bitch on the internet isnt going to bring your hero home.

Mmm, yes- arguing that the government should follow the constitution is such a bitch move to someone who loves the president and their party more than their country.