- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Historic immigration reform included in House-passed spending bill
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:02 am
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:02 am
The social spending bill approved by the House Friday in a 220-213 vote includes the most extensive immigration reform package reviewed by Congress in 35 years, albeit in a much reduced version from what proponents originally sought.
If the provision is approved by the Senate as-is, the immigration measure in the bill would allow undocumented people present in the U.S. since before 2011 up to 10 years of work authorization, failing short of an initial goal to offer them a pathway to citizenship.
The provision approved by the House offers a sort of waiver to immigration laws, using a process known as parole to allow people to stay in the country for five years with the option to extend for another five years thereafter.
The bill also includes visa recapture, preventing the loss of some 222,000 unused family-based visas and 157,000 employment-based visas that otherwise expired at the end of last fiscal year. The move will help retain immigration pathways for those abroad who often wait years to immigrate to the U.S.
The core issue that protracted itself over weeks — and remains unresolved — was the Senate parliamentarian's advisory opinion on what could and could not be included in a reconciliation bill, which is limited to budgetary line items.
The House-passed bill will now go to the Senate under reconciliation rules in an effort to sidestep a Republican filibuster and pass the package with only Democratic support.
ADVERTISEMENT
The parliamentarian, an unelected official who provides counsel on Senate rules, advised the first two Democratic immigration proposals were incompatible with reconciliation, warning they went beyond a budgetary impact and represented a substantial change in policy.
While the House version's loophole could quell some of the tensions between Democrats and grassroots immigration advocates, a reversal from the parliamentarian could quickly reignite those flames. LINK
If the provision is approved by the Senate as-is, the immigration measure in the bill would allow undocumented people present in the U.S. since before 2011 up to 10 years of work authorization, failing short of an initial goal to offer them a pathway to citizenship.
The provision approved by the House offers a sort of waiver to immigration laws, using a process known as parole to allow people to stay in the country for five years with the option to extend for another five years thereafter.
The bill also includes visa recapture, preventing the loss of some 222,000 unused family-based visas and 157,000 employment-based visas that otherwise expired at the end of last fiscal year. The move will help retain immigration pathways for those abroad who often wait years to immigrate to the U.S.
The core issue that protracted itself over weeks — and remains unresolved — was the Senate parliamentarian's advisory opinion on what could and could not be included in a reconciliation bill, which is limited to budgetary line items.
The House-passed bill will now go to the Senate under reconciliation rules in an effort to sidestep a Republican filibuster and pass the package with only Democratic support.
ADVERTISEMENT
The parliamentarian, an unelected official who provides counsel on Senate rules, advised the first two Democratic immigration proposals were incompatible with reconciliation, warning they went beyond a budgetary impact and represented a substantial change in policy.
While the House version's loophole could quell some of the tensions between Democrats and grassroots immigration advocates, a reversal from the parliamentarian could quickly reignite those flames. LINK
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:04 am to Jbird
Wouldn't that make it ineligible for reconciliation?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:05 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:I am guessing that will be addressed.
Wouldn't that make it ineligible for reconciliation?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:06 am to Jbird
Every Republican who voted for the Infrastructure bill is responsible for this bill being able to gain traction.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:06 am to Jbird
I truly hate our political system. Both parties seem to delight in sneaking stupid shite into their legislative adventures. Would it kill someone to pass an infrastructure bill with solely infrastructure in it?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:06 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
I truly hate our political system. Both parties seem to delight in sneaking stupid shite into their legislative adventures. Would it kill someone to pass an infrastructure bill with solely infrastructure in it?
This isn't the infrastructure bill, but this bill had no chance of passing if the infrastructure bill had not passed.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:07 am to CGSC Lobotomy
When’s the last time progstains cared about rules?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:07 am to Jbird
quote:
The core issue that protracted itself over weeks — and remains unresolved — was the Senate parliamentarian's advisory opinion on what could and could not be included in a reconciliation bill, which is limited to budgetary line items.
The House-passed bill will now go to the Senate under reconciliation rules in an effort to sidestep a Republican filibuster and pass the package with only Democratic support.
The parliamentarian, an unelected official who provides counsel on Senate rules, advised the first two Democratic immigration proposals were incompatible with reconciliation, warning they went beyond a budgetary impact and represented a substantial change in policy.
Too bad the Klansman ain't around any more. He'd be a guaranteed NO for this reason alone.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:08 am to Jbird
It's all good. Once republicans learn how to steal elections and insert our next R President he can then executive order all of their citizenships be rescinded, because that's how our country works now.
Anyone who still thinks we are a free, self governing nation is also out buying bridges for sale.
Anyone who still thinks we are a free, self governing nation is also out buying bridges for sale.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:23 am to Jbird
Unbelievable that we the people can’t do anything to stop such crap. Freaking just over 400 idiots get to vote. What’s best for us. All the IRS people should go check into all of congress and senate income. That’s just a start instead they will audit every small business in the USA that serves no purpose for these elected jackasses.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:31 am to Jbird
Gawd how many pages is this Bill if it has to have this included?? We really need to stop all these bloated smorgasbord Bills.
BTW - anyone else hear the news that the AGs office has come to an agreement on the money to the family seperation deal??
BTW - anyone else hear the news that the AGs office has come to an agreement on the money to the family seperation deal??
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:37 am to Jbird
All this will do is push some democrat voters even further down the totum pole. And black people will stay at the bottom.
Mcdonalds is saying take your 25 and shovel it. Jesus can work three positions.
Mcdonalds is saying take your 25 and shovel it. Jesus can work three positions.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 9:38 am
Popular
Back to top
