Started By
Message

Student loan debt

Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:21 pm
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10648 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:21 pm
Clearly loans should be repaid.

My question is what should the interest rate be?

Banks charge interest to make a profit, is that the goal of the federal government with student loans as well? If so, should it be?

Should the federal government be in the student loan business?

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
107614 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Should the federal government be in the student loan business?


Ask Obama. He and the Dems did this shite.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
30638 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Should the federal government be in the student loan business?



No.

Thanks Obama
Posted by Bayou Warrior 64
Member since Feb 2021
586 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:30 pm to
No, the government should not be in the student loan business, nor should they guarantee any portion of residential loans, etc., etc. Let the banks provide the service and assume the risk.
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
16141 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:42 pm to
Bingo. Get the government out of it. Another Obama frick up.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17165 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

My question is what should the interest rate be?


Don’t forget origination fees.

It’s an unsecured loan and there’s no telling what the real amortization will be.

Should be commensurate with unsecured personal loans at least, maybe not as high as credit cards.
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
25191 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:48 pm to
Schools should be on the hook

They charge way too much. Even state schools charge as much as TCU cost when I was a student - that's absurd

They can charge as much as they want as long as these loans are given out like candy and backed by the government
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
25134 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Should the federal government be in the student loan business?


No.

And I'm also open to the Universities eating some of these costs, depending on their behavior.

I saw a special years ago about how admin officers were lying to potential students about job placement rates and salaries post graduation in a few local undercover videos. I'm generally buyer beware, but this was out right lying.

Such people need to be fired and universities held accountable. Not for the whole bill, because the students did end up getting a degree. But a portion of the debt in such cases the universities should be forced to eat.
This post was edited on 4/27/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20791 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:49 pm to
The rate should be whatever the loan terms were. That said, loans should be left to the private sector. Riskier loans get higher rates naturally. Having parents cosign means the risk is less, but the parents being guarantors are on the hook.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
60502 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

My question is what should the interest rate be?
Given the default rate.. 20+% They are way riskier than credit cards.

But ultimately….
quote:

The rate should be whatever the loan terms were.
Is the correct answer.
This post was edited on 4/27/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
13238 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Ask Obama. He and the Dems did this shite.


This. My loans predated the Obama “fix”. I had a 2.43% rate at one time. Was based on the prime rate and every June/July it would be recalculated.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6442 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


They can charge as much as they want as long as these loans are given out like candy and backed by the government


Someone suggested that the universities become a cosigner.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
17067 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:18 pm to
Just make them dischargeable.

Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20791 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Just make them dischargeable.


And let the debtors off the hook? If the debts are discharged in bankruptcy, someone ultimately loses. The United States guarantees the loans written by banks. That's why the rate is lower. That means taxpayers are on the hook.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
17067 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

And let the debtors off the hook?

Bankruptcy is off the hook?

Name any other debt besides child support where you cannot discharge it.

The tax payer is on the hook for all government loans, are they not? Yet those are dischargeable.
Posted by SaintsTiger
1,000,000 Posts
Member since Oct 2014
1450 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:52 pm to
All I know is about the time graduated, they passed something that made my interest rate over 6%. And people that graduated a few months the later have a 3% interest rate. Wasn’t any way to refinance to get a lower rate.

I want to say Nancy Pelosi spearheaded that BS.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20791 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Bankruptcy is off the hook?


No. I'm talking about the student loan debt. Why should it be discharged? It's not because it is a Federal obligation. The same as most debts due the IRS. Taxpayers are on the hook.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
31103 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 1:57 pm to
I think they should work to corral the huge increases in tuition cost, remove the government from backing these loans, then reduce the interest rates on current student loan debt to fixed 2% and allow people to start actually paying down the principal on their outstanding balances.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
17067 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Why should it be discharged?


Discharged through bankruptcy if the debtor so chooses... like any other conceivable debt in this country. Even Tax debt.

They were dischargable until 2005. Was your life as a taxpayer before 2005 worse because of it? Odds are, you didnt even notice.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20791 posts
Posted on 4/27/25 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Discharged through bankruptcy if the debtor so chooses... like any other conceivable debt in this country. Even Tax debt.

They were dischargable until 2005. Was your life as a taxpayer before 2005 worse because of it? Odds are, you didnt even notice.


Your point is taken, but just because no one notices that a debt is no longer discharged, still means it gets added to the country's debt when not repaid. That's sweeping it under the rug like it never happened.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram