re: The US secretly sent long-range ATACMS to Ukraine — and Kyiv used them

They've had those for a year, I thought you had something new for me.

Interesting way to admit you can’t read.

There are people actually dumb enough to post as if they know everything, while actively demonstrating they understand almost nothing about the reality.

I can be against ukraine funding while still understanding that the atacms isn’t our “new” stuff as the person i originally replied to was implying.

But whatever strawman arguments you guys need to make yourself feel better.

*Kiev

I didnt say it was right, just that you look ignorant acting like atacms is our new stuff, which was the post you orig made. It came into service in 1989, was designed and tested before that. So its not the over exaggerated 50 years old you stated, its *only* 35 years old… that IS old tech by any measure.


I agree with you that we shouldnt be sending/funding, i just actually care about factual statements that strengthen my argument as opposed to gotcha circle jerks that the poliboard loves so much.

quote:

---

ATACMS Read more at: LINK Source - Stars and Stripes

---

It’s not brand spanking new but it’s certainly not 1950s weapons like a lot of Ukraine boot lickers have implied.

The whole point, the one that seems to escape you, is that we are giving away perfectly good weapons that we’ve already spent billions on then spending more billions to replace them.!

quote:

---

Its just not a helpful point to make acting like it isnt older tech.

---

The point is that it’s not some 1950’s tech like what the give Ukraine everything crowd has been trying to peddle