- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker says Congressmen including prominent high ranking members are being threatened
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:37 am to Da Sheik
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:37 am to Da Sheik
Every member of the Uniparty is compromised in some form. Whether they are pedos, drug abuses, wife beaters, cheaters, etc,
If none of those, then they are all definitely getting wealthy off of illegal kickbacks or insider trading.
Either way, they are all owned.
If none of those, then they are all definitely getting wealthy off of illegal kickbacks or insider trading.
Either way, they are all owned.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:12 am to Da Sheik
Reminds me of the major drug cartels in Columbia …. they threatened the lives and famili of the nation’s judges and judicial leaders. After that, they operated criminal enterprise freely …. Just as the Chicago mob did
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:26 am to cadillacattack
quote:
Reminds me of the major drug cartels in Columbia …. they threatened the lives and famili of the nation’s judges and judicial leaders. After that, they operated criminal enterprise freely …. Just as the Chicago mob did
Nobody has yet to come close to explain how, if the IC is this powerful, they allowed so many Congressmen and Senators to flip flop on this issue.
Almost everyone who has gotten a shot at renewing FISA has voted yes and no. Why was all this flip flopping allowed? How were the very select few who have only voted NO allowed to avoid this intrigue?
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:50 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
If the Chief Justice can be captured, anyone can.
The Chief Justice wasn't captured... He was always one of them. He was appointed by Cheney/W.Bush.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So why was Gaetz able to flip? And all the other Republicans who supported FISA renewal in 2018?
aka "Muh not true... this is 'right wing conspiracy.'"
You can't help yourself, can you?
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:57 am to FLTech
quote:
If it's safety - They make plenty of money to hire security
You think their private security can protect them from the CIA/FBI/Pentagon? In D.C.? That's cute.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I argued this for a long time, but Trump showed he had declined mentally in a major way by the 2020 election.
The TDS is so real.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 9:01 am to DesScorp
quote:
In late Rome the Legions picked the emperors, killing them if they displeased them. Why would our empire be any different?
Yup. These frickers assassinated a sitting U.S. President and tried to assassinate another, not to mention a laundry list of powerful people and political/public figures they have assassinated over the decades. They are evil, ruthless and untouchable.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 9:02 am to TBoy
Go suck that MSNBC cock some more, fig.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 9:07 am to Da Sheik
When this happened
i knew this happened
by these people
quote:
Speaker Johnson flip from a boarder security Conservative first to giving Ukraine a blank check.
i knew this happened
quote:
Congressmen including prominent high ranking members are being threatened
by these people
quote:
our Intel agencies
Posted on 4/22/24 at 9:12 am to Revelator
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 8:45 am
Posted on 4/22/24 at 9:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nobody has yet to come close to explain how, if the IC is this powerful, they allowed so many Congressmen and Senators to flip flop on this issue. Almost everyone who has gotten a shot at renewing FISA has voted yes and no. Why was all this flip flopping allowed? How were the very select few who have only voted NO allowed to avoid this intrigue?
Pretty obvious that “yes” and “no” votes on many issues are curated. A more vulnerable seat votes a certain way that benefits them in their district while assuring the required number of votes are still going the right way. Many votes on the record are meaningless and purely theatre for the masses. That’s why red meat issue votes happen with an opposition president, there’s no danger of it actually accomplishing anything.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News