- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
When Trump Uses Power, Courts Balk, When Biden Did, They Bowed
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:37 pm
LINK
Good article that compares SCOTUS action on Biden's parole policy and Trump's AEA
quote:
Suppose two presidents exercise the powers of the executive branch. One does so under an explicit statutory grant during a time of declared emergency. The other acts pursuant to administrative discretion in the face of record-breaking border incursions. Now suppose that federal judges enjoin both policies. What happens next?
If the president is a Democrat, the Supreme Court stays the injunction. It instructs the lower courts to stay their hand, warning that questions of immigration policy lie chiefly with the political branches. It urges patience, careful deliberation, and above all, continuity of government operations while the matter is litigated.
Good article that compares SCOTUS action on Biden's parole policy and Trump's AEA
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:43 pm to JimEverett
quote:
A defender of the Court might suggest factual distinctions. Parole and removal are different contexts, and each case is unique. But this evasion collapses upon closer scrutiny. In both cases, a president acted under color of federal immigration law. In both, litigation ensued. In both, district courts weighed in. But only one president was permitted to continue enforcement during litigation. The other was not. The judicial principle, if one can call it that, is not one of law but of partisanship.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:47 pm to JimEverett
Bowed? How about disappeared while individual civil rights were suspended by WH draconian measures...not a peep by those robed bandits
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:49 pm to JimEverett
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:52 pm to JimEverett
Dems challenge everything, we didn’t under Biden. Rublicans bowed down to Biden and participated in Ukraine war funding.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 10:55 pm to JimEverett
The actions of SCOTUS in the very near future regarding the clearly unconstitutional power play at hand will certainly determine the fate of this country.
There was a time when you could trust the supreme arbiters of the law of the land to protect the interests of America. But now I fear that time has long since passed.
There was a time when you could trust the supreme arbiters of the law of the land to protect the interests of America. But now I fear that time has long since passed.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 11:06 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Dems challenge everything, we didn’t under Biden. Rublicans bowed down to Biden and participated in Ukraine war funding.
The argument is republicans follow the law above politics. The Democrats don’t.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 11:43 pm to dgnx6
quote:
The judicial principle, if one can call it that, is not one of law but of partisanship.
Sums up the sad state of our Judicial branch.
It has become a weapon. The Left has made of mockery of what it was intended to be (as they have with many other things).
By Any Means Necessary.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 11:50 pm to Great Plains Drifter
When you have understand how much of the leftist agenda is achieved not through votes, but through the courts, it's obvious why leftists fill the courts with ideologues.
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:39 am to FightinTigersDammit
Time to make Robert’s a deal he can not refuse!
Posted on 4/23/25 at 6:23 am to TrueTiger
quote:
while U.S. citizens were thrown in solitary confinement without a trial for years
Any info on specific people this was done to?
Popular
Back to top
