Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why are we not enforcing existing laws?

Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:03 pm
Posted by ImaObserver
Member since Aug 2019
2292 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:03 pm
WHY ARE WE NOT ENFORCING EXISTING LAWS? Why are the elected officials, political elite, business owners, religious organizations, Lawyers, etc. etc. seemingly exempt from the laws that apply to the rest of the nation? When are the federal authorities going to start enforcing our laws?? It's long past time to start hanging them out to dry- They, along with all of the federal government officials, sanctuary state governors, city mayors, religious organization officials, school administrators, attorneys, and all other officials that aid and abet and give safe harbor to illegal aliens are subject to punishment.These people are subject to penalties of five years to life for each illegal they shielded, depending on how serous the crimes committed by each of those illegals, and the fact that the people they are sheltering are here illegally is the first crime and good for the first five years. Get off of your azz and GO GET THEM Atty. U. S. Atty. General . 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens - Aiding and Abetting - TEN years in prison for each count. 18 U.S. Code § 1510 - Obstruction of criminal investigations - 5 years in prison; 18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony - 3 years in prison for each count. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense - 5 years in prison.
18 U.S. Code § 1502 - Resistance to extradition agent - One Year in prison; 18 U.S. Code § 3. - Accessory after the fact - not more than 1/2 of the primary guilty party's penalty nor more than 15 years.
This post was edited on 4/1/24 at 1:09 pm
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
5959 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:06 pm to
Takes work, elected officials do not like work
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
5035 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:09 pm to
We want situational law enforcement to match our situational ethics. We enforce no rioting on the US Capitol and panties on here get super torqued.

So it all depends
Posted by Swamp Angel
Georgia
Member since Jul 2004
7311 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

We enforce no rioting on the US Capitol and panties on here get super torqued.


Selective enforcement seems to be how you like to see things dine, huh? Lots of riots all over the country in 2020 and our elected officials were threatening police if they enforced the law. Cars, businesses, and homes burnt, police officers and civilians attacked, assaulted, beaten, even killed, but the riots were allowed to proceed so as not to infringe upon the perpetrators' civil liberties. But a non-violent walk through the nation's capitol led by police leads to the arrest and prosecution of an unknown number of people who injured no one nor did they burn anything down.

Please, tell us more of this "situational ethics" thing of which you speak.
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9228 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:55 pm to
Wait, wait, KJP and the White House tell me all the time that we are a nation of laws and that they will follow the law.

I'm so confused.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22230 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 2:57 pm to
Selective application of the law. There is Single Party rule in just about every single major city in the US. The Democrats control the mayor's office, DAs, judges and bureaucracies.

The GOP has been reduced to a minority opposition party. Thank your board 3rd Party voters, who are just fine with Democrat rule (e.g. SFP, AggieHank, etc.).
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
5055 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Why are we not enforcing existing laws?
.

Bukaws



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram