Word on the street / Adam Schiff busted like Letitia James

Copy/pasted from a Trump Facebook page

——-

Serious allegations have emerged against California Congressman Adam Schiff, accusing him of mortgage fraud, voter fraud, and election-related misconduct. These claims, highlighted by Californian Chris Bish and Darren Ellis in a detailed draft report, raise substantial concerns about Schiff's residential and voter registration history, particularly his claims of primary residence in Maryland despite representing California in Congress.

In April 2023, an ethics complaint was initially filed against Schiff, alleging voter and election fraud due to dual residency claims in California and Maryland. Schiff, who was elected to Congress in 2000 representing California, purchased a Maryland home in 2003, which he declared as his primary residence. Despite this declaration, Schiff continued voting and maintaining political representation in California.

The report presented by Bish and Ellis points to specific acts that may constitute mortgage fraud under Maryland Code §7-401. Schiff refinanced his Maryland property multiple times (in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2013), consistently declaring it as his primary residence, thereby potentially obtaining advantageous mortgage rates. During a 2009 House Ethics investigation, Schiff acknowledged this issue as an error and repaid the related tax exemptions. This admission, according to the Bish-Ellis report, may suggest intentional wrongdoing consistent with mortgage fraud.

Notably, similar allegations have led to serious legal consequences for others, such as former Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby, recently convicted of mortgage fraud, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is currently facing similar accusations.

Further compounding these issues, Schiff and his wife, Eve, reportedly sold their California residence in May 2003 before buying the Maryland home the following month. From 2003 to 2009, despite primarily living in Maryland, they remained registered voters in California without maintaining a valid California domicile. California Elections Code clearly states that an individual who establishes domicile in another state forfeits their California domicile and related voting rights. Yet Schiff continued to represent California in Congress during this period, potentially violating California Election Codes (§349, §18203, and §18560).

Additionally, Schiff’s purchase of a small condominium in Burbank, California, in 2009 raised further suspicions. The property, described as having just one bedroom and bathroom, appeared insufficient for a family of four, further calling into question the legitimacy of Schiff’s claimed California domicile.

These allegations also involve charges of ineligible voting, as Schiff and his wife are alleged to have participated in absentee voting in California while residing in Maryland, an action explicitly prohibited by California Election Code §18578.

The gravity of these allegations underscores the need for a thorough investigation by authorities to determine if Schiff committed election fraud, mortgage fraud, or voter fraud. The findings outlined by Chris Bish and Darren Ellis have ignited significant concern regarding the legality of Schiff’s residential and voter registration actions over nearly two decades.