- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
More ivermectin cover-up
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:42 am
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:42 am
So a very prominent researcher, Andrew Hill PhD, with a major conflict of interest doctored his research to secure grants from Bill Gates Foundation and Unitaid.
This dude should be in jail asap.
World Tribune article
Twitter link w/video of Hill being confronted
quote:
Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use. Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective. On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.
This dude should be in jail asap.
World Tribune article
Twitter link w/video of Hill being confronted
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 10:20 am
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:57 am to Bdub79
Save link and send it to everyone
Posted on 1/26/22 at 10:09 am to Bdub79
This is why I always say that data can say whatever the highest bidder wants.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:18 am to Bdub79
quote:
he used the same sources as in the original study
No, he didn't. Some of the studies previously included were shown to be either fraudulent or at very high risk of bias, so were removed.
Shockingly, upon removing the fake / biased studies, the positive effect disappeared.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News