Started By
Message

More ivermectin cover-up

Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:42 am
Posted by Bdub79
Member since Aug 2018
39 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:42 am
So a very prominent researcher, Andrew Hill PhD, with a major conflict of interest doctored his research to secure grants from Bill Gates Foundation and Unitaid.

quote:

Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use. Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective. On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.


This dude should be in jail asap.

World Tribune article

Twitter link w/video of Hill being confronted
This post was edited on 1/26/22 at 10:20 am
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
37743 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:56 am to
Wow.
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
15970 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:57 am to
Hang Gates next to him
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 9:57 am to
Save link and send it to everyone
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
8250 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 10:09 am to
This is why I always say that data can say whatever the highest bidder wants.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17510 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:06 am to
H
O
L
Y

S
H
I
T
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21987 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:18 am to
quote:

he used the same sources as in the original study


No, he didn't. Some of the studies previously included were shown to be either fraudulent or at very high risk of bias, so were removed.

Shockingly, upon removing the fake / biased studies, the positive effect disappeared.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram