Started By
Message

re: The IVF Ruling Puts Republicans in a Bad Spot Just Before the Election

Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:27 pm to
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34603 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

reproductive choices


You mean, as in seeing a pregnancy (however conceived) to term?

If so, then you are correct.

Otherwise, you are just being your typical, piece of shite self.
Posted by Ann Arbor Tiger
Land of "GO BLUE"
Member since Jan 2004
185 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:31 pm to
Look up selective reduction which happens in almost every IVF case, and tell me this is not abortion.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64758 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:47 pm to
The evil of the Dems for Democracy at work.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64758 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:48 pm to
How many of these you got for us. Is it approaching the million mark? Per Year?
Posted by Ann Arbor Tiger
Land of "GO BLUE"
Member since Jan 2004
185 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:01 pm to
Every time IVF occurs, multiple embryos are inserted to help ensure one or more implants. If 2 or more implant, which happens in many cases, selective reduction is recommended by the OB.

Article about selective reduction from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

“Spontaneous multifetal pregnancies have always posed increased medical risks to pregnant women and their fetuses. Between 1980 and 2009, the increased use of assisted reproductive technology and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropins resulted in a dramatic increase in the incidence of multifetal pregnancies. More recently, advances in laboratory techniques and a national effort by professional groups have led to greatly improved live birth rates despite the transfer of fewer embryos, which has significantly reduced the incidence of twins and higher-order multiple births 2. As an example, between 1980 and 2009, the twin birth rate increased 76%, from 18.9 to 33.3 per 1,000 live births 3. It has since stabilized and is currently 33.5 twins per 1,000 live births 4. The birth rate for higher-order multiples increased more than 400% between 1980 and 1998, when it peaked at 1.935 per 1,000 births 3. Between 1998 and 2015, deliveries of higher-order multiples decreased by 46% to 1.036 per 1,000 births 4. Although these advances have reduced the rate of higher-order multifetal pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF), the risk remains higher than with naturally achieved pregnancies. Unlike with IVF, fertility treatments that involve controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropins do not control for the number of eggs fertilized or embryos implanted. As such, the risk of a higher-order multifetal pregnancy is increased compared with IVF. This risk is estimated to be 9% 5.”
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64758 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:06 pm to
EHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH?????
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14077 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

If you’re retarded. We have a good friend who had three children through IVF. They donated to couples who didn’t have fertilized eggs.
you serious?
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41773 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

You're getting emotional because you've been lied to about this issue and believe it.

Where am I wrong in my post?
Posted by ThoseGuys
Wishing I was back in NC
Member since Nov 2012
1982 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 8:01 pm to
So I don't feel like making a new topic but I have often wondered something.

I have two coworkers who are strong Pro-Life. Neither is very big on government support programs though.

So how can you really be Pro Life if once the child is born you go "good luck from here on out". Wouldn't you feel the need to ensure the child has every opportunity until they reach a set age?

I feel like this is why I've never been Pro-Life. Because I simply will not agree to have the government become responsible for all these welfare moms who pop out baby after baby, needing to go on Maury to figure out who the dad is.
This post was edited on 2/25/24 at 8:02 pm
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26398 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Will be fixed before the election

Alabama is trending blue, as a result of the mindless ruling. That'll be the fix
Posted by MemphisGuy
Member since Nov 2023
3612 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Alabama is trending blue,
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131540 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

tarzana


at your age, I'd be very careful about bragging about being pro baby killing.

either that or start investing in asbestos.


Posted by Miketheseventh
Member since Dec 2017
5847 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

against the wishes of their constituents when they could be focusing on something meaningful

Do you mean like the Libtard’s have been doing since 2015. They made up shite against him. Made up shite because they knew the media would help them push the lies. Do you think they could have been doing something else for the last nine years instead of being obsessed with Trump and neglecting any form of real government. The TDS is strong with the Libtard’s
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26398 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

pro baby killing

Good try, but epic fail. IVF is about making human life, not ending it
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111668 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Look up selective reduction which happens in almost every IVF case, and tell me this is not abortion.


It is abortion based upon life begins at conception.

What is the incidence of multi fetal reduction in IVF?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23299 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Where am I wrong in my post?


Because this ruling was literally about financial liability of a medical facility that killed a couples baby due to negligence.

I have friends who after years of efforts birthed a baby with the mothers last viable egg.

If the facility would have killed it due to negligence I would want them to be able to sue so that it incentivizes elimination of negligence.

Should couples not be able to sue?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram