- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Per Zach Lowe: Pelicans added to teams that will pursue D Mitchell if no extension
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:21 pm to supe12sta12z
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:21 pm to supe12sta12z
If Cleveland is trading him it's because he wouldn't sign an extension with them. Why would he sign an extension with the Pels if he wouldn't with the Cavs?
No extension = Low offer from Griff. Most of the competitors appear to be markets he would stay in long term, so they can go further than the Pels if Mitchell doesn't agree to an extension, which I don't think he would if he's actually being traded.
No extension = Low offer from Griff. Most of the competitors appear to be markets he would stay in long term, so they can go further than the Pels if Mitchell doesn't agree to an extension, which I don't think he would if he's actually being traded.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:31 pm to TigerinATL
Nobody knows other than the rumors that are floating around. That's why teams will need to find out what he wants and his value will be directly proportional to the cost. And that will play a large role in how teams approach the risks of pursuing him or not.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:48 pm to TigerinATL
quote:Would seem obvious to most. Pretty logical.
If Cleveland is trading him it's because he wouldn't sign an extension with them. Why would he sign an extension with the Pels if he wouldn't with the Cavs?
No extension = Low offer from Griff. Most of the competitors appear to be markets he would stay in long term, so they can go further than the Pels if Mitchell doesn't agree to an extension, which I don't think he would if he's actually being traded.
Posted on 5/18/24 at 7:36 am to TigerinATL
quote:
Why would he sign an extension with the Pels if he wouldn't with the Cavs?
I don’t know the answer to this, but signing an extension doesn’t mean anything in today’s climate. Even if he signs an extension, if he isn’t happy after a year he’ll just ask to be traded.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News