Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Almost 45 trying to determine where I want to be bond vs equity mix now that there is rate

Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:10 am
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38804 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:10 am
Any good articles or suggested reading to determining portfolio mix?

Also my 6 month emergency is all Treasury ladders do I segregate that or cout towards my total mix

Interested in any feedback good or bad lol
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
37723 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 8:25 am to
The bond market has changed dramatically in the last few years with the amount of debt we have now.

It is experiencing historical draw downs that we have not seen before.

Bond prices are trading at 2013 levels

You are only 45, stay in the S&P 500 (even though only 10 of the companies are responsible for 90% of the growth) and consider a small portion of your portfolio to a hard asset that can't be printed out of this air (gold/BTC)

Seriously, at 45 there is no reason to have any money in bonds. If you were 70, my opinion on the matter would change slightly.

Posted by Rize
Spring Texas
Member since Sep 2011
15827 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:27 am to
I haven’t changed anything in my 401k in 12 years. Just went and looked and my bonds were sucking arse. Moved it to S&P 500 because it was out performing everything else I’m in except for my company stock.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38804 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:31 am to
quote:

haven’t changed anything in my 401k in 12 years. Just went and looked and my bonds were sucking arse. Moved it to S&P 500 because it was out performing everything else I’m in except for my company stock.


Yeah that's my feeling still to young not to be mostly in
Posted by Rize
Spring Texas
Member since Sep 2011
15827 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:33 am to
Yeah I’m 42 and need to get my shite together.

I didn’t know what the S&P 500 was until a couple weeks ago and still don’t even know what all I’m invested in. I can see what all I have my money in but I have no idea what it is.
This post was edited on 5/4/24 at 9:36 am
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50167 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 9:33 am to
Why hold bonds? I’d rather bury cash in my back yard.
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32976 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 2:04 pm to
I’m the same age. Have an I-bond, as well as some CDs and T-bills that are laddered. Rest of my money is an 80/20 split.

While I could probably be more aggressive, I think diversity is important.

Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15940 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 2:14 pm to
Some data shows over decades “small” caps outperform “large” caps.

I have 403b/457 in low cost funds.
Basically split into small cap, mid cap, and real estate.

I have a lot of money in individual stocks in other accounts. Majority is mega cap like Apple, Altria, Verizon, Proctor and Gamble, JNJ, etc.

I keep a good chunk of cash in money market and CDs in case I want a car or a trip or a major expense occurs.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48660 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 2:52 pm to
I'm 46 and 100% stocks. No plans to change that in the next 10 years.
Posted by Art Blakey
Member since Aug 2023
95 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 7:30 am to
quote:

The bond market has changed dramatically in the last few years with the amount of debt we have now.

It is experiencing historical draw downs that we have not seen before.

Bond prices are trading at 2013 levels

You are only 45, stay in the S&P 500 (even though only 10 of the companies are responsible for 90% of the growth) and consider a small portion of your portfolio to a hard asset that can't be printed out of this air (gold/BTC)

Seriously, at 45 there is no reason to have any money in bonds. If you were 70, my opinion on the matter would change slightly.


In a regime of fiscal dominance where debt/gdp must be shrunk to avoid govt insolvency long bonds are certificates of confiscation, reward free risk.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
1185 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 10:20 am to
Putting the majority of your money in the s&p500 isn't a bad idea. If you don't understand what the other options are, then you might go ahead and move that to the s&p as well.
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4121 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Also my 6 month emergency is all Treasury ladders do I segregate that or count towards my total mix?


Segregate that. The whole point of an emergency fund is near instant liquidity in the event of an “emergency”, right?

So if you’re laddered in Treasury bills for that purpose, it would create a skew if you counted that in the total mix as you decide on appropriate allocations over time. At your age, in your (true) investment accounts, there’s little need for much if any bond allocation. Throwing in a light percentage of notes, preferred class and/or healthy dividend paying equities isn’t a bad idea. But again, at your age, I’d still lean toward having the heaviest allocation in growth equity products like ETFs and maybe some commons that don’t individually exceed 10% of the portfolio.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10267 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I haven’t changed anything in my 401k in 12 years. Just went and looked and my bonds were sucking arse. Moved it to S&P 500 because it was out performing everything else I’m in except for my company stock.


At the end of a rate hike cycle? You’re essentially selling at the bottom… the time to get out of bonds was when the fed starting raising rates. JMO.

The window for bonds to rally WITHOUT stock is still pretty dang small though. That’s the perverse thing about them. Rarely do they ever outperform, even when they “should”. Rates get cut bonds will go up, but only for a bit. Eventually stocks will bottom and start to outperform. Of course this is assuming that rate cuts happen because something broke and needs rescuing. Not the Fed just cutting to cut. If that happens bonds are still going to underperform.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20295 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 4:22 pm to
I’m the same age and just went through a financial analysis. I was told that I should be in an 80/20 mix compared to what I had, which was at 90/10
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124074 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

You are only 45, stay in the S&P 500 (even though only 10 of the companies are responsible for 90% of the growth) and consider a small portion of your portfolio to a hard asset that can't be printed out of this air (gold/BTC)

Seriously, at 45 there is no reason to have any money in bonds. If you were 70, my opinion on the matter would change slightly.
This.
I wish I could justify a significant bond position. ROI is just not competitive ... yet.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124074 posts
Posted on 5/6/24 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

I should be in an 80/20 mix
Given current ROI, I'd have to be hard pressed to go 20% bonds at age 45. Run the numbers, including taxes.

Obviously nothing is guaranteed, but I'd look at other ways to diversify.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram