Started By
Message

re: Do we think Gayle would pay the 1st lax line if we went over it,

Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:48 pm to
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23115 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 8:48 pm to
I showed you direct evidence from this season that shows you are wrong….
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23115 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:01 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Are none of the Thunder, Timberwolves, Cavs, Magic, Pacers, Mavs, Knicks contenders?
Posted by Sauce Castieaux
Asheville, NC.
Member since Nov 2015
5034 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:12 pm to
For a real contenter yes.

Would you pay the tax for this team?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111083 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

showed you direct evidence from this season that shows you are wrong
The post you referenced did not, factually speaking, show "direct evidence that" People act like simply being a luxury tax team instantly makes you a contender."
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111083 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Would you pay the tax for this team?
If I was worth $6 billion, without question I would, without hesitation.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23115 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:06 pm to
Why are you continuing to deflect and crawfish? Forget about what I said originally that you disagreed with. You said you have to be a tax team to be a contender. There’s plenty of playoff teams right now who are not in the tax who are legit contenders.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

There’s plenty of playoff teams right now who are not in the tax who are legit contenders.


Yeah but problem is we’re not close to those teams. So the real question should be could getting into the tax help us be contenders? I think it can especially if you’re having trouble becoming a contender while staying under the tax.

The goal for the team isnt be under the cap AND be a contender. The goal should be to become a contender any way possible.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9814 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 5:15 am to
quote:

The goal for the team isnt be under the cap AND be a contender. The goal should be to become a contender any way possible


Do you really equate spending to success in a regulated sports league with a salary cap?

Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
5080 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:27 am to
quote:

ownership is not serious about winning


I've been saying this for years. This is a profit vehicle for Gayle. She couldn't give less of a shite if they win 20 games or a championship as long as she's making the most money possible.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23115 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I've been saying this for years. This is a profit vehicle for Gayle. She couldn't give less of a shite if they win 20 games or a championship as long as she's making the most money possible.


You've been wrong for years then. Gayle Benson is 77 years old. She has no children to leave anything to. She's already made it public that once she dies, the proceeds from the sale of the team are all going to charity. She has way more money than she can spend before she dies. It makes absolutely zero sense to think she's only interested in making a profit from the Pels and puts that above winning.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

You've been wrong for years then. Gayle Benson is 77 years old. She has no children to leave anything to. She's already made it public that once she dies, the proceeds from the sale of the team are all going to charity. She has way more money than she can spend before she dies. It makes absolutely zero sense to think she's only interested in making a profit from the Pels and puts that above winning.


Every above reason you gave doesn’t mean she wouldn’t put profit over winning. You’re acting like her personal attorney when you say stuff like she has enough money to spend before she dies. All this is just personal opinion based on nothing other than what happens to her money when she dies.

Reality is she married Tom at a very late edge, inherited everything he had and his kids are completely cut out of everything regarding professional sports.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 3:33 pm
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Do you really equate spending to success in a regulated sports league with a salary cap?


Do you equate not spending to success in the NBA?

Meaning its better not to spend to become competitive or stay competitive to win a title.

Again the issue is simple: can this team be better if went over the cap?- the reality yes. Especially since the franchise has been in existence while staying under the cap we haven’t even reached the west conf finals.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23115 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 3:32 pm to
There are more reasons to suggest she wouldn't put profits over winning than the other way around.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

There are more reasons to suggest she wouldn't put profits over winning than the other way around.


These aren’t reasons they’re just personal opinions. You have no idea what she feels or what she wants. Frankly because she never speaks about her personal franchises and their futures in any way. When have you heard Gayle talk about saying we’ll do anything to make the pelicans a winner including paying the tax?
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23115 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 3:55 pm to
Gayle hasn't said it, but David Griffin has. He's stated they will go into the tax when they feel it's time and it's the right move.

They built a new practice facility and are apparently about to do a big renovation there this offseason. She's given Griffin authority to keep firing head coaches even though that cost her millions. They revamped the nutritional/training/medical side of the franchise.

Plenty of examples of her investing in the Pels. The only thing to suggest she won't pay the tax is that she hasn't before in her 5 years of being the solo owner.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28449 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 6:41 pm to
The Clippers and Suns did it and look how it worked out
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

He's stated they will go into the tax when they feel it's time and it's the right move.


In other words unless they make west conf finals game 7- shes not paying the tax.

quote:

They built a new practice facility and are apparently about to do a big renovation there this offseason. She's given Griffin authority to keep firing head coaches even though that cost her millions. They revamped the nutritional/training/medical side of the franchise.


Yet their gleague squad plays in a better arena than the pelicans. This has literally been said by pelican players themselves.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 7:15 pm
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

The Clippers and Suns did it and look how it worked out


The Mavs and Celtics are paying it. Hows that turning out?
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17914 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

The Clippers and Suns did it and look how it worked out


The Mavs and Celtics are paying it. Hows that turning out?


The Clippers (for now) are still in the playoffs, so it might be premature to bury them, but the Suns and Bucks both made big gambles this past off-season and went deep into the tax, and it's bombed in both cases.

It's reminiscent of the Lakers move to add Westbrook. Those episodes illustrate the danger, because Gayle isn't rich enough for us to go way into the tax and then spend a bunch more to try to fix everything if it doesn't work.

We'll get one shot at this, and it has to work.

So, yes, we need to make moves to go into the tax and contend, but we have to make absolutely sure that they are the right moves, because we won't get another chance for a long while.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9045 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

We'll get one shot at this, and it has to work. So, yes, we need to make moves to go into the tax and contend, but we have to make absolutely sure that they are the right moves, because we won't get another chance for a long while.


Thats very true but look at it this way. If it works- all well and good we’re contenders.

If it doesn’t and Griffin fricks it up- he probably gets fired.

Looks like a win/win situation to me.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram