The OWGR can change their criteria in a heartbeat if they want to in order to rank LIV players. They are just choosing not to. I don't give a flip one way or the other about LIV, but they have a stronger field than any other tour not named the PGA Tour week in and week out and are not getting points.

If the PGA Tour can change the way they operate (no cut Signature events, etc.), then surely the OWGR can find a way to incorporate LIV, even if they are awarded fewer points for being smaller fields with 54 hole events. This shouldn't be that difficult.

Everyone is being obstinate here.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by lsupride87

Member since Dec 2007

96209 posts

Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:48 am to BMoney

quote:
The OWGR can change their criteria in a heartbeat if they want to in order to rank LIV players. They are just choosing not to.

Or, the rationale way to look at it, LIv can change their format in order to get ranked by the established metrics everyone else followed. They are choosing not to

This post was edited on 3/5/24 at 9:49 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by AlxTgr

Kyre Banorg

Member since Oct 2003

81806 posts

Posted on 3/5/24 at 11:17 am to BMoney

quote:
The OWGR can change their criteria in a heartbeat if they want to in order to rank LIV players. They are just choosing not to. I don't give a flip one way or the other about LIV, but they have a stronger field than any other tour not named the PGA Tour week in and week out and are not getting points.

If the PGA Tour can change the way they operate (no cut Signature events, etc.), then surely the OWGR can find a way to incorporate LIV, even if they are awarded fewer points for being smaller fields with 54 hole events. This shouldn't be that difficult.

This

0 ...

Report Post

Golf Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board