quote:
No. He literally said "that has a lot to do with what we support that group with" in the next sentence regarding the negative net. He clearly feels those 3 aren't the underlying issue.

And after that he said "but certainly we have to be open to a lot of different things." He's not going to publicly bash CJ or BI or even hint at them being on the trade block.

The overall impression I got is that just about everything in on the table this offseason and that includes moving CJ/BI.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Pels_Yaz

Member since Apr 2023

9140 posts

Posted on 4/30/24 at 1:46 pm to Mickey Goldmill

quote:
The overall impression I got is that just about everything in on the table this offseason and that includes moving CJ/BI.

I will say this although personally I think they’ll run it back, they’re wasn’t this crazy high praise for BI and CJ. Instead I just heard about the high praise in regards to Zion. I think this playoff series was a big reality check in regards to how good those two really are without Zion. I still think they may explore trading either but not once did I hear Griff saying we definitely want to extend BI. I think this is telling and will be interesting to see how this plays out.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by supe12sta12z

Tiger Town

Member since Apr 2012

10491 posts

Posted on 4/30/24 at 1:52 pm to Mickey Goldmill

He was clearly referring to giving the big 3 the ancillary pieces to help them thrive.

And when he was asked about adding another difference maker, He said he doesn't know if we needed to add another difference maker as much as we are needing pieces that makes the difference makers we already have better.

You dude think we blowing up shite when in reality he's just going to move role players and call it a day.

1 ...

Report Post

Pelicans Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board