Started By
Message

re: Cancellation of Mid-Barataria Diversion project could cost Louisiana at least $700 million

Posted on 5/10/24 at 4:16 pm to
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
673 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 4:16 pm to
You just named three projects that couldn’t be more different than the point in case. I sincerely hope you just googled that and are in no way associated with coastal restoration because you sound like one of those “trust the science” zealots. The diversion is a religion to you, and anyone who does not fall in the line and praise CPRA is outcast.
I’ve been studying this for over 30 years and have forgotten more than you actually know. You can join the diversion circle jerk all you want but spending over $5B for the limited return is insane.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14616 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

I’ve been studying this for over 30 years and have forgotten more than you actually know.

Same could be said for the engineers and scientists that have designed the diversion project.
Posted by lsufishnhunt
Member since Jun 2008
1028 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Barataria landbridge / Lake Hermitage / Spanish Pass


quote:

You just named three projects that couldn’t be more different than the point in case


3 projects that dredged sediment from the MS River and placed it in the same basin that would be benefitted by the diversion project “couldn’t be more different than the point in case”?

You obviously have some knowledge on the situation but nearly everything you’ve posted in this thread has an angle.

If ManInStadium is “religious” to the diversion - then you are also “religious” to dredging, or at least some part of the dredging process.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram