Started By
Message

What are the odds of Costello testifying the DAY BEFORE Cohen's Cross-Examination?

Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:29 am
Posted by Original Bayou Boy
Flat Lake, LA
Member since Sep 2003
11272 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:29 am
Got to give it to Jim Jordan and the Congressional Republicans. They are doing their part to fight against the machine.

Calling Bob Costello to testify that Cohen cleared Trump in 2018, the day before his final cross-examination was brilliant.

Timing is everything. News cycles are everything.

Revealing that Alvin Bragg had this information and ignored it to indict Trump anyway is astounding.

Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49917 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:33 am to
Morons
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96544 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:37 am to
Judge will sustain any objections to Costello’s transcripts being introduced then also attempt to block Costello as a defense witness to counter Cohen.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
110 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Judge will sustain any objections to Costello’s transcripts being introduced then also attempt to block Costello as a defense witness to counter Cohen.


This is my opinion as well.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99316 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Judge will sustain any objections to Costello’s transcripts being introduced then also attempt to block Costello as a defense witness to counter Cohen


Yeah...denial of impeachment witnesses is always a good look.
Posted by Amblin
Member since Sep 2011
2580 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:09 am to
quote:

News cycles are everything.


If it helps Trump, wont be shown, if hurts him it will.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10499 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:39 am to
The low life Cohen had sex with Stormy and mortgaged his house to buy her off, then slipped cost onto Trump’s bill or said he did to hide the fact it was him is what it’s looking like
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26771 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Judge will sustain any objections to Costello’s transcripts being introduced

As he should. The transcript of Costello's congressional testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
quote:

block Costello as a defense witness to counter Cohen

Different matter entirely, and there is no reason Costello should be prevented from testifying if called by the defense. But I highly doubt that Trump's team wants to subject Costello to cross.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 10:44 am
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10499 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:42 am to
I would hope that he try that. It would surely get him tossed from the bench and losses of license to practice law if he did. Hell he’s already likely to get that anyway
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
23007 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Judge will sustain any objections to Costello’s transcripts being introduced


quote:

As he should. Inadmissible hearsay.



Are we talking Costello or Daniels?
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10499 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:46 am to
Explain how exactly it’s inadmissible hearsay when he was Cohen’s attorney and Cohen told him directly?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96544 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Explain how exactly it’s inadmissible hearsay when he was Cohen’s attorney and Cohen told him directly?


And Cohen’s AC privilege was revoked because of actions he took while Costello was his attorney, so he can’t hide behind that as a way to block it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124273 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Inadmissible hearsay.
Costello's testimony regarding what Cohen directly told him is hearsay?
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68412 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Costello's testimony regarding what Cohen directly told him is hearsay?


Absolutely


But stormy talking about what Trump told somebody is fact and proves guilt.

Kangaroos invade americam justice
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26771 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:56 am to
quote:


Explain how exactly it’s inadmissible hearsay when he was Cohen’s attorney and Cohen told him directly?

Costello's congressional testimony transcript is hearsay in Trump's trial. Costello would need to be present to testify or fall into a hearsay exception, which I do not believe he does.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26771 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Costello's testimony regarding what Cohen directly told him is hearsay?

Costello's congressional testimony for use in Trump's trial? Yes, absolutely. At least the transcripts, which is what I addressed. His live testimony would obviously not be.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 9:58 am
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26771 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:00 am to
quote:

And Cohen’s AC privilege was revoked because of actions he took while Costello was his attorney, so he can’t hide behind that as a way to block it.

That would matter for Costello's live testimony at the trial, but transcripts of Costello before congress is hearsay and not coming in regardless of any AC privilege situation.
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
4783 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:12 am to
Doesn't matter dems will say Cohen is more reliable
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124273 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Costello's congressional testimony for use in Trump's trial?
The contention is the Biden-donor democrat partisan judge would block Costello from testifying. Why wouldn't they just call Costello as a witness?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26771 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:27 am to
quote:

The contention is the Biden-donor democrat partisan judge would block Costello from testifying.

The comment I responded to mentioned both the transcript and his live testimony being disallowed.

Which is why I said that the transcript would be properly inadmissible, but the live testimony would be a different story.

quote:

Why wouldn't they just call Costello as a witness?

They would have to, which was my point in my first response.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 10:29 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram