re: Darius garland or Trae young

quote:

---

Ingram is not worth a 30% max, Trae is

I don’t understand what your motive behind this is? One is a top 25 player, the other is a top 40-60 player, they are not comparable

---

I think this is the disconnect. Given everything involved, on and off the court, I don't think Trae is a top 25 player. I think he's closer to 40 than he is 25, to be honest. I would have him somewhere between 32-36ish. I would have BI pretty close to that as well. I think everyone we're talking about here, Trae, BI, Garland, Murray, are all hovering around the same area. Same tier sort of deal, give or take.

So back to the motive, why I ask, you can't be against BI's max but be for Trae's. That doesn't make much sense.