Started By
Message

re: Bama considered TX rumors 'smoke' over the Brown Coup- never took seriously

Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by alabamared
Infindibulae
Member since Oct 2013
122 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:30 pm to
Wink wink!! ..."a pretty face can hide an evil smile..."
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32907 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:30 pm to
Tell you what gump...

Find a published story from a month ago or longer stating CNS was due to get a big raise at season's end

Your move...
Posted by Schwaaz
Member since Sep 2009
7375 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:31 pm to
What generated the interest in a new contract was Ark signing their coach to a contract just below Saban. It started the ball rolling then Sumlin's contract put more pressure on it. Texas was used to make look more necessary to the public.
Posted by alabamared
Infindibulae
Member since Oct 2013
122 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:32 pm to
I move by sitting still- get it? You got it - PAWNED!
Posted by bamafan425
Jackson's Hole
Member since Jan 2009
25607 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:32 pm to
March of 2012.

He has won an SEC championship, BCS national championship, playing for another BCS bowl game and won over twenty games losing only two since his last extension.

That gets you a raise anywhere you are coaching. Let's be real.
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20564 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Texas flirting with Nick didn't have anything to do with this


Some group trying to force Mack out and Nick Saban negotiating a new deal.

These were parallel events running separately. Texass brass were never dealing with Saban. Never. Saban's agent did a great job of dealing with tons on misinformation and assumptions. Saban's agent and Bama concern for losing Nick got him his money. There was no offer from Texass.

Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22053 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

March of 2012.
that makes more sense...someone in another thread said March but didn't put the year.

Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22053 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

There was no offer from Texass.
no formal offer but I believe that Texas informally gave Sexton some numbers to consider...
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32907 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:35 pm to
I take that to mean not a single one of you frickers can cite any legitimate published news source

Got it!
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Find a published story from a month ago or longer stating CNS was due to get a big raise at season's end



Talks didn't begin until just before the Iron Bowl. So you won't find those published reports. A coach who is 79-14 (soon to be 80-14 *crosses fingers*) over seven seasons deserves a raise.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32907 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:36 pm to
Sounds so convincing
Posted by bamafan425
Jackson's Hole
Member since Jan 2009
25607 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:37 pm to
Don't worry. The whole board is making that mistake.

The contract is more than fair for what he's accomplished since his last raise.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30393 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:38 pm to
I think the raise has more to do with the next job openings everyone will try to shoehorn Saban into.
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20564 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

no formal offer but I believe that Texas informally gave Sexton some numbers to consider...


That would have been the group wanting Mack out. All they needed was for Saban or his agent to give some positive indication that he was interested.

Had Saban done that, then there would have been tremendous pressure on the Mack supporters to get him out of there either by forced resignation or firing.

Saban never gave any positive signals and those guys strategy left them high and dry. Their plan fell completely apart. Some high powered boosters may have called Saban or his agent but it wasn't done on behalf of the University. They went rogue and lost.

You say you believe Texas gave him some numbers... I think you need to consider it was some boosters not authorized by anyone. IF that is the case... Was it really Texas? I say absolutely not.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Sounds so convincing



And you sound so mad.

Newsflash for you: Mack Brown is still your head coach. Saban would have never made a move on any job while there was still a coach in place at said job. If Texas was so sure they were going to get Saban they would have fired Brown and offered Saban the job. The fact that Mack Brown will still be your head coach in 2014 speaks volumes to what went down behind the scenes.

The Texas name isn't as strong as you think it is.
This post was edited on 12/14/13 at 12:42 pm
Posted by MykTide
Member since Jul 2012
25515 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Newsflash for you: Mack Brown is still your head coach. Saban would have never made a move on any job while there was still a coach in place at said job. If Texas was so sure they were going to get Saban they would have fired Brown and offered Saban the job. The fact that Mack Brown will still be your head coach in 2014 speaks volumes to what went down behind the scenes


He's a LSU fan.

A very angry one.

Posted by alabamared
Infindibulae
Member since Oct 2013
122 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 12:51 pm to
U mad? Nah ... Just mediocre butthurt laughinstock of college football!! Special olympics of Texas got nothing on you guys!!!
Posted by RebJas
Suburbs
Member since Jan 2011
165 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 1:00 pm to
Brian's on fire in this topic.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32907 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 1:00 pm to


I'm not mad but its so ironic that none of you can cite anything legitimately showing this was always the plan

So I'm still waiting for a link
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 12/14/13 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Nick got a new contract in March...he does not win the SEC this year and does not play for the national title, yet he gets nearly a 50% raise yesterday...and we are supposed to believe that the idea of Texas flirting with Nick didn't have anything to do with this?

Of course that's the reason. They may not have been seriously worried that he'd leave, but setting him up with the huge contract sure didn't hurt. Best way to fend off other programs that may come calling in the future.

That's Alabama's attempt to control the message. Leaks from Texas have been the only info up to this point. Alabama just wants to put their own spin on it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram