- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Barstools
| Favorite team: | Georgia  |
| Location: | Atlanta |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 9506 |
| Registered on: | 1/20/2016 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Liberal debates Trumps conviction and is asked what crime he committed
Posted by Barstools on 6/5/24 at 11:30 pm
Yet nothing he did is against the law...
0
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 8:23 pm
[quote]This also ignores how the "legal services" were expenses of a company that wasn't related to Cohen's law firm.[/quote]
And that makes absolutely no difference at all under the law. If my client investing in apartment homes sends payment to the developer, instead of the general contractor. ...
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 6:24 pm
[quote]Even the fraudulent nature of the expense (and the company knowing it)?[/quote]
There is no fraudulent nature of this expense. Nuisance fees are legal expense under GAAP. This is not a public company, this is a company owned by Trump. Trump as the owner can pay as much as he wants for that...
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 6:10 pm
[quote]What if the company participates in creating a fraudulent invoice and a repayment scheme to conceal the nature of expenses?[/quote]
In this case it doesn't matter the nature of the expenses. No one here is claiming this expense wasn't business related.
So, like I said, there is nothing...
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 5:58 pm
[quote]That law is literally why he was found guilty, for the exact scheme I'm describing.[/quote]
No way you typed this out with a straight face. He was convicted becaue he is Trump. Not due to any actual law on the books.
Again, there is no law that limits how much a company can pay on an i...
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 5:52 pm
The law does not say that overpaying an invoice is illegal. You're stupid and a liar....
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 5:46 pm
[quote]I mean the NY business record law literally is that law[/quote]
Wrong that's not what the law says....
re: "Dr." Jill leaves trial when they start showing pics of Hunter naked with his gun?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 5:45 pm
[quote]Every person with a doctorate is called by the earned title.[/quote]
Not true at all. I don't call people doctor if they aren't a doctor of medicine. You can try to pretend a Ph D in education makes you a doctor but that would just make you a retard....
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 5:23 pm
And there is no law that Trump cannot pay more than the services rendered. Whether it's legal expense or a standard write-off as a miscellaneous expense, it's a business expense nonetheless
Again, there is absolutely nothing inherently illegal about overpaying an invoice. Try again fake Saul Good...
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 5:08 pm
[quote]this was an actual "legal expense", Cohen should have billed $130k + his actual legal work, and been paid only for his actual legal work.[/quote]
Trump can pay as much as he wants for legal expenses. There is no limit. If he wanted to pay Cohen 150k or 150M it doesn't matter and it isn't f...
re: Was part of Trump’s crime NOT evading state taxes?
Posted by Barstools on 6/3/24 at 3:25 pm
[quote]these were all payments for "legal services", but the intentionally inflated the payments[/quote]
This isn't a crime at all. Trump can pay whatever he wants for legal expenses. It's not against the law to pay more than you're invoiced. You're actually retarded....
re: Hotel near Disney has an inflatable bondage bear for the vacationing children to see
Posted by Barstools on 6/1/24 at 12:44 pm
You're actually retarded if you think it's irrelevant because it's a franchise. Franchise groups literally have rules and guidelines to protect their brand imagine. This directly affects the Disney brand. You're an actual waterhead. ...
re: Bill Clinton shoud’ve been the first president convicted of a felony
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 3:54 pm
Prime Hillary has a horse face. ...
re: 1400 acres of WI farmland gone
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 3:52 pm
[quote]What happens in the winter when all that glass freezes over?[/quote]
Funny you should ask. Part of my portfolio that I am I charge of auditing are solar farms, specifically solar farms that are designed to generate solar tax credits.
I have a couple of clients that generally have farms...
re: Mickey Goldmill: You claimed the judge was selected at random....
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 3:45 pm
So you're saying that with fair instructions and application of the law, NY would also acquit Trump like Florida will but in Florida, with unfair instructions and application of the law, Mrrchan would get FL to convict?
Sounds like you're too stupid to acknowledge you just admitted Merchan was g...
re: Conservatives have become the "Snowflakes."
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 1:47 pm
[quote]Crying because Trump isn't getting his "fair share" of positive coverage or patson the back, that somebody said something mean etc[/quote]
If you cannot see this is bigger than Trump you're too stupid to insult. We are upset with the justice system being used to attack people based solely ...
re: Let’s assume the jury got it right.
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 1:24 pm
And it's not a fricking crime. Even if it were "grossed up" whayever the fuxk that means, he can pay as much as he wants for legal fees. There is no limit on legal expense under GAAP so long as it is in the course of business. Which certainly describes protecting a brands image. It's made up bullshi...
re: Let’s assume the jury got it right.
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 1:21 pm
So its not a real thing. If you gross something up you ate presenting it NOT net. The only time presenting something gross instead of net, would be a crime, is if GAAP requires it to be presented net and someone knowingly and with the intent to conceal. Such as someone presenting Fixeds assets not n...
re: Let’s assume the jury got it right.
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 1:12 pm
I'm a CPA but please explain to me what "Gross Up" means in relation to a business expense reimbursement?
You're so stupid you don't even know the meaning of the words you're saying.
...
re: Merchan doesn't care even he's disbarred after this.
Posted by Barstools on 5/31/24 at 12:04 pm
The odds of Mechan getting 3 cases related to Trump via random assignment is at most 1/24^3 or 0.00723%. That's using the 24 judge pool that doesn't even include Merchan as an option. Congratulations, you're retarded....
Popular
14
