Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Montegut
Biography:Survived 4,828 assasination attempts (so far)
Interests:lighting myself on fire then running around in circles.
Occupation:Retired Superhero
Number of Posts:7691
Registered on:4/30/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: We’re playing NC y’all

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 6:27 pm
[quote]Also, this is attempted jinx on NC. [/quote] you're not supposed to [b][i]SAY[/i][/b] it's a jinx attempt....

re: How Are We Losing

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 12:15 pm
[quote]Maybe he is not as good as you think.[/quote] he's in the top 10 in NCAA history for career home runs. he's also in the top 10 all-time at LSU in career Batting Average and he is like the #15 overall prospect in the upcoming draft. I think that means he's pretty good....

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 11:06 am
[quote]I did not see him step on or in front of the plate. Everyone saying what the rule is, but did he violate the rule?[/quote] i don’t think he did. but this particular thread is about the rules themselves and their interpretation. ...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 10:46 am
[quote]Yeah it doesn’t change the rule but it should have absolutely made a little common sense and game awareness apply. Once the batter bailed and made no attempt to even stay in the box then you have to be 200% sure the catcher violation was so egregious that it had to be called. Not only was it ...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 10:25 am
[quote]While it is not an automatic strike as many people have mentioned, when the batter steps out of the box before the catcher moves forward, you can no longer have interference, since there was no batter to interfere with. What they umpires failed to recognized was that the play changed when the...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 9:33 am
[quote]Well if thats the only thing that was considered, debatable for sure they got it right or wrong, but in the end, even if they got there the wrong way potentially, the other rules exists which Neal CLEARLY broke making it the right call even if the method getting there was incorrect. [/quote...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 9:27 am
[quote] the other rules exists which Neal CLEARLY broke making it the right call even if the method getting there was incorrect. [/quote] except he didn't . catcher's interference is never, ever, ever, ever, ever called without a swing except in this exact scenario. because there is a rule wri...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 9:25 am
[quote]It doesnt matter if the hitter is attemptong ot hit it or not. It's all about does the catcher give him the chance to or not. Neal gave him zero chance at the attempt of hitting it because he wa in front of him before the ball was received. The batter has no chance to make any form of contact...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 9:22 am
[quote]We dont know what all was considered, we dont get all the information. But the rule obviously exists in a way Neal broke it and what should have happened, happened. The problem is the announcers went off on a completely irrelevant tangent to 1 part of the rule when there were others t...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 9:13 am
[quote]In the end, it was the correct call and the rule that everyone kept bringing up is irrelevant, it's 1 rule, but there's other catcher's interference rules. Neal ultimately did not let the batter any attempt to swing at the pitch, and it was a pitch being the key there, therefore it's catcher'...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 8:53 am
[quote]To me, there's no possible way they just all agreed that Neal did "step on or in front of the plate", when minutes before, a call of out was made by the home plate umpire(who if he had seen Neal step on or in front of the plate, wouldn't have called the out).[/quote] agreed. but since ...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 8:42 am
[quote]What does the rule book say about the original judgement call on the field being overturned after the players left the field and a 5 minute commercial break, only after the other manager complained? [/quote] ok, so digging through the rule book. anything I can find on this at all is writt...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 8:23 am
[quote]is it safe to say it was strike 3(is there an auto strike when batter leaves box when live?) and 3 away and ball becomes dead before the other stuff occured?[/quote] there is no "auto strike". ball strike would be called as if the batter was still there. the call of catcher's interfe...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 8:12 am
[quote]What does the rule book say about the original judgement call on the field being overturned after the players left the field and a 5 minute commercial break, only after the other manager complained?[/quote] I'll have to do some digging through this book to see what (if anything) is speci...

re: Very disappointing flight

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/31/24 at 7:19 am
[quote]Just arrived in Chapel Hill from New Orleans on an almost empty airplane.[/quote] i doubt that is the only plane making the flight?...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/30/24 at 3:18 pm
[quote]What does it saw about what happens when the batter steps out of the box on a pitched ball?[/quote] [quote] b? Abattershallnotleavetheirpositioninthebatter’sboxafterthepitchercomesto the set position or starts the windup unless permission is granted by the umpire? PENALTY for b —If...
[quote]Infield fly out still happens, and no one can advance in the case the contact caused a play where the runners could actually do so. Instead you're awarding a double play on a fly ball that didn't even need to be caught.[/quote] no, it doesn't have to be caught, but you do need to keep the ...
[quote]The Orioles one was way worse than this. That one ended the game and the fielder actually caught the ball[/quote] didn't just catch the ball, but took about 382 more steps after the "interference", then camped under ball until next afternoon, then made the catch. [embed]https://www.yo...

re: Catcher's Interference Rule?

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/30/24 at 1:51 pm
Exact Text of rule copied and pasted from official NCAA rulebook [quote]p. If, on an attempted squeeze play or steal of home plate, the catcher steps on or in front of home plate without possession of the ball or touches the batter or the bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk and the cat...

re: First a Snake Now an Alligator

Posted by Nutriaitch on 5/30/24 at 1:48 pm
[quote]Any idea what part of Houma the snake was caught? It had to be in the city limits since it was HPD.[/quote] neighborhood across the bayou from Terrebonne High. ...