- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russia has a claim for Alaska next
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:33 pm to saints5021
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:33 pm to saints5021
No population centers so no risk of extremely high personnel lost
Air Force base in anchorage is the only military support
War would be predominantly navel, would us risk its fleet for polar bears and fish
Home country support is about equidistant and equal supply issues
Air Force base in anchorage is the only military support
War would be predominantly navel, would us risk its fleet for polar bears and fish
Home country support is about equidistant and equal supply issues
2
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:52 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
War would be predominantly navel, would us risk its fleet for polar bears and fish
No, but they would for all the fricking OIL RESERVES beneath Alaskan soil.
And there are multiple military bases in AK.
Yes, the US would fight to the death to prevent a Russia/China coalition from taking one of our states and gaining a massive chunk of territory on North American soul.
I'm kinda confused by this thread.
Posted on 2/23/22 at 3:53 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
War would be predominantly navel, would us risk its fleet for polar bears and fish
You forgot the oil and natural gas.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News