- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Penix may be the single most impactful player in recent CFB history
Posted on 1/4/24 at 5:29 pm to lsufball19
Posted on 1/4/24 at 5:29 pm to lsufball19
quote:
You over exaggerated how bad LSU’s was
You watch any football this year?
quote:
ignored that Washingtons was terrible
The 54th ranked scoring defense in America, above-average
quote:
Your stats aren’t even helping your argument but rather highlighting mine
I don't follow, I just established that Washington's scoring defense was above-average and LSU's was basically as bad as their total defense. How on Earth does that highlight your argument and not help mine?
This post was edited on 1/4/24 at 5:36 pm
1
Posted on 1/4/24 at 7:35 pm to Gen Patton
quote:
You watch any football this year?
I did. Your own arguments are trying to tell me Washington actually had a worse defense because their schedule was much easier. The funny thing is you don’t realize what you’re actually doing
quote:
I don't follow,
I’m very aware
When I say lsu had the 108th ranked defense and Washington had the 97th ranked defense, and your response is that Washington played an easier schedule, you do realize you’re saying LSU’s is better than it appears and Washington’s worse than it appears, right?
This post was edited on 1/4/24 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 1/4/24 at 8:48 pm to lsufball19
quote:
I did. Your own arguments are trying to tell me Washington actually had a worse defense because their schedule was much easier. The funny thing is you don’t realize what you’re actually doing
That's not what my argument attempted to tell you, my argument attempted to tell you that Washington's defense was better than LSU's in scoring defense while playing an easy schedule most of the way
quote:
your response is that Washington played an easier schedule, you do realize you’re saying LSU’s is better than it appears and Washington’s worse than it appears, right?
You do realize I supplemented my point of Washington going undefeated playing a garbage schedule with how good their scoring defense was which I presume is what matters when it comes to, you know, actually winning games? I'm not falling for your gotcha, you can stop with the madness.
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:38 pm to Gen Patton
quote:
that Washington's defense was better than LSU's in scoring defense while playing an easy schedule most of the way
Why do you think their schedule being easier helps your argument that their defense was better?
quote:
I'm not falling for your gotcha, you can stop with the madness.
I’m sorry you’re struggling to follow basic logic
Posted on 1/4/24 at 9:41 pm to Jack Ruby
Jeaux Burreaux made ED ORGERON a national champion coach.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 10:17 am to Colonel Flagg
The PAC 12 is pretty stout this year.
Washington beats Texas.
Arizona beats Oklahoma
Oregon beats a solid Liberty team 45-6.
5-3 in bowl games so far.
Washington beats Texas.
Arizona beats Oklahoma
Oregon beats a solid Liberty team 45-6.
5-3 in bowl games so far.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 10:17 am to lsufball19
quote:
Why do you think their schedule being easier helps your argument that their defense was better?
Because when you play easier competition, that naturally translates to a defense submitting above-average marks for scoring defense
quote:
I’m sorry you’re struggling to follow basic logic
Reciting some false religious sports catechism and bending the knee to a completely overstated and exaggerated position is not following "basic logic," it's falling for a gotcha game
Posted on 1/6/24 at 10:27 am to Gen Patton
quote:
Because when you play easier competition, that naturally translates to a defense submitting above-average marks for scoring defense
UW has played the 2nd toughest schedule in the country.
LINK
Posted on 1/6/24 at 11:30 am to MikeyFL
quote:
We still think the SEC had dominant teams this year?
Old habits die hard. Very difficult for many to admit the 2023 SEC was the 2014-2022 Big Ten.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 11:39 am to Gen Patton
Posted on 1/6/24 at 11:42 am to Gen Patton
quote:
Washington played the 13-14th ranked schedule until they played Oregon and Texas in December and January, LSU played the no. 1 schedule through the end of the regular season
LSU played Grambling and Georgia State for their cream puff games while Washington played Boise State and Tulsa.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 3:35 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
Lot of upset lsu fans worried about any mention of the undefeated national title Qb should have won heisman over the multiple loss Qb
Posted on 1/6/24 at 4:36 pm to Snoop Dawg
quote:
Washington has the #2 SOS:
I'm not trying to discredit UW but is that factoring in the extra games against Oregon and Texas?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 7:15 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
I'm not trying to discredit UW but is that factoring in the extra games against Oregon and Texas?
Probably...when you play the #6 team in the country (that doesn't drop in the polls) twice...and then play Texas at #3, your SOS is gonna be pretty high.
But the PAC did have about 5-6 teams ranked in the Top 25 consistently for most of the year.
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:42 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Probably...when you play the #6 team in the country (that doesn't drop in the polls) twice...and then play Texas at #3, your SOS is gonna be pretty high.
But the PAC did have about 5-6 teams ranked in the Top 25 consistently for most of the year.
I thought they were comparing UW's SOS to LSU's.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:49 pm to Jack Ruby
If TCU had won in it last year, would we have been talking about the TCU QB (whose name escapes me) as the best QB in 25 years?
Posted on 1/7/24 at 6:50 am to Jack Ruby
What’s the term, “recency bias”?
Too many other factors surrounding the player and team to go down that path. Talent, strength of schedule, strength of the league vs the other leagues, style of play, etc.
And define recent? 5 years, since 2000, since 1985?
Too many other factors surrounding the player and team to go down that path. Talent, strength of schedule, strength of the league vs the other leagues, style of play, etc.
And define recent? 5 years, since 2000, since 1985?
Posted on 1/7/24 at 8:59 am to Hamma1122
quote:
Mediocre?? Comical
Auburn was 8-5 in 2009 and 8-5 in 2011. In 2010 they went 14-0 the only difference was Newton, yes they were mediocre without him
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News