Eat your crow

Extremely obvious we just beat a more talented team.

ETA: OP is trolling. Madking has been the most aggressively anti McMahon / anti LSU basketball / anti Woodward poster on the board all year.

His context is that the roster is actually top shelf, so the team has been underachieving due to coaching. Of course, that’s not true at all — McMahon is getting the absolute most out of these kids & we’ve been consistently improving.

UK is more athletic & that’s a fact… We don’t have a Dillingham or a Reeves or a Thiero. We don’t. Very impressive program win.

We truly have one of the worst fan bases I’ve ever seen. Just had a big win and the first thing people do is come to this board to talk shite to other LSU fans.

quote:

---

Everyone who said this team wasn’t talented enough to beat average teams eat it

---

Says the guy who says we don't have the right coach... eat a bag of dicks madking.

Where’s my crow?
I’ve been a big McDoubter since the hire.
Great win! Lots of positivity, I’m convinced. Keep it rollin!

quote:

---

Eat your crow
Everyone who said this team wasn’t talented enough to beat average teams eat it.

---

After watching men’s basketball tonight they look like a middle of the pack SEC team.Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:46 pm

quote:

---

Everyone who said this team wasn’t talented enough to beat average teams eat it.

---

Of all the things to take away from this game lol

McMahon beats two consecutive top 20 teams and you’re using it as evidence he sucks. That’s some next level mental gymnastics.

We could make the NIT y’all! It’s only McMahon‘s second year!!

quote:

---

Everyone who said this team wasn’t talented enough to beat average teams eat it.

---

So kentucky is an average team when they have more NBA players ON THEIR BENCH than when do on our entire roster? Or are you talking about other games that happened months ago?

The only team talent wise that we we're much better than that we lost to was Nicholls.... and I think we're all well beyond that. I don't remember ANYONE saying that Nicholls was more talented than us. If anything it was the OPPOSITE and that's why we were so damn upset.

Every other loss was to teams that were either CLEARLY MORE talented than us OR only slightly better or worse than us. Should we have won more of those games? Sure. But we really only have one (maybe 2 if you count Syracuse) bad loss on our resume, and that's Nicholls. The only teams ranked lower than us in Kenpom that we lost to are:

Nicholls (bad loss that we all know we should have won)

Syracuse (terrible loss, but no Cook to counterract Judah Mintz)

Georgia (who we lost by 2 on the road)

Every other team that beat us is ranked higher than us by all analytical sites. And we've beaten multiple teams ranked HIGHER than us in Kenpom (75): North Texas (74), Wake Forest (21), aTm (52), Ole Miss (70), South Carolina (55), and Kentucky (23). So we've beaten exactly TWICE as many teams ranked higher than us than lost to teams ranked lower than us.

So I don't quite know what you're talking about.

The fact of the matter is WE are an average P5 team talent wise and we're going to lose games we should win and win games we should lose. It's the nature of the game. Imagine if instead of losing by 2 ON THE ROAD BTW to Florida and Georgia we won those games. We'd be 16-10 and 8-4 in conference. Different conversations would be had about this team. It's not like we're significantly better talent wise than those teams.

I'm active on basketball boards and I don't think anyone said that teams we could beat (i.e. Georgia, A&M, Florida) were more talented than us. That only applies to the Bamas, Tennessees of the world. You're a smart guy and you know ball but your hatred for McMahon prevents you from being objective, and that's why no one likes you. Stop making shite up.