Started By
Message

LA-5 deserves better, Letlow needs to go

Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:11 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40215 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:11 am
Regardless of how you feel about Ukraine and helping them it was obvious that the bill was going to pass. Julia Letlow still voted against it. LA-5 is a dying district especially now that CenturyLink is gone. Letlow didn’t even try to leverage her vote in order to get something in return for the district. It would have been great if she could have gotten a defense plant for the district or something like that. La-5 deserves better. We need a representative that is going to try improve the district instead of a representative who just bends over to help the world’s largest welfare queens (aka farmers).
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 8:24 am
Posted by DeafVallyBatnR
Member since Sep 2004
16907 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:19 am to
Appointed like a monarch and voting for what she is told to do. But she is so nice is what I was told when she was running. I voted for the Alexandria guy and did not vote last time. Disgusted with the whole process.
Posted by sta4ever
The Pit
Member since Aug 2014
15438 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:20 am to
Good luck with that.
Posted by DeafVallyBatnR
Member since Sep 2004
16907 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:21 am to
Century is gone. It's been gone the building was donated to ULM..
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 8:23 am
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26824 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Julia Letlow still voted against it.

Wait so now we want them to vote FOR Ukraine aid?

quote:

Letlow didn’t even try to leverage her vote in order to get something in return for the district.

Can we at least be consistent on this type of thing? Do we want single-issue legislation, or do we want a bajillion earmarks and pork in every bill so that every member of congress can have a community center built in some podunk village in their district?
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27018 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Julia Letlow still voted against it.


Good for her. I don't much else about her, but she sounds better than Mike Johnson.

Are you FOR giving money to Ukraine, but against giving money to farmers?
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9830 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:27 am to
I'm surprised she voted no.

Good for her.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81789 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Letlow needs to go
Nope
Posted by samson73103
Krypton
Member since Nov 2008
8222 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:51 am to
quote:

world’s largest welfare queens (aka farmers

Just make sure you don't criticize farmers at the dinner table.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
13087 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

just bends over to help the world’s largest welfare queens (aka Ukraine).



FIFY
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17315 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:25 am to
This is the 1st time I have heard of the useless woman NOT voting WITH the DemProgFilth. She’s done NOTHING for conservatives in general much less anything for her state nor district.

Been saying for 2 years +, she needs to go! She’s a DemProgFilth enabler.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11377 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:33 am to
Sounds like a personal grievance.

She was supposed to offer an amendment to "get something for her district"?

You're retarded.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram