Started By
Message

re: How does Ram potentially retiring affect the cap

Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:22 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423791 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:22 am to
quote:

This is where it pays to have good owners - Kraft would get him some money down the road and Ram would trust him to do so and would retire

This isn't about money in his pocket. This is about cap implications, which ownership can't fix. Ram was one of our 2 "piggy banks" to get under the cap and there is a monstrous amount of dead cap waiting.

I believe that he took a paycut and there is a good chance he's a roster spot only, b/c he can't "retire" until June of 2025, for cap purposes. We're basically paying him a few million to not destroy our 2025 cap (which would happen if he retired today).
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82333 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:24 am to
I see. I'm retarded
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16493 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:37 am to
quote:

I believe that he took a paycut and there is a good chance he's a roster spot only, b/c he can't "retire" until June of 2025, for cap purposes. We're basically paying him a few million to not destroy our 2025 cap (which would happen if he retired today).

With how jacked up the cap is, it honestly would not surprise me if they push this off until June 2026. Have a similar restructure in 2025 dropping his 2025 ca hit from $29.7M to $13M, then do a final one in 2026 for him to retire in 2026 and you basically get to manage his cap hit over 4 years instead of 2 or 3.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram