Started By
Message

re: Why have churches started allowing gay preachers?

Posted on 5/14/24 at 12:22 am to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 12:22 am to
quote:

Why have churches started allowing gay preachers?


Because Protestantism.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21813 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 12:30 am to
quote:

Why have churches started allowing gay preachers?


Same reason they stopped backing slavery: religion changes over time.

Did you honestly think that the only true Christianity was the specific sect of Christianity taught in the southern US in the 80s/90s?
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23849 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 2:23 am to
quote:

The most expensive catholic school in Lake Charles is called Episcopal Day School and …

Wow
Posted by ZIGG
Member since Dec 2016
10201 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:09 am to
because modern day, Democrats are the ones pushing all of this he/she, make-believe gender nonsense.
This post was edited on 5/14/24 at 9:03 am
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
5087 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 5:47 am to
Why has God made some people gay
Sure some are choosing but c'mon some are made gay.

So why do you hate God's creation.....again

Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53969 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:01 am to
quote:

some are made gay.


Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
13498 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:27 am to
quote:

It should be frightening that 75% stayed.


More would have left but they simply can’t afford to purchase their building and property.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16107 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:27 am to
Seems like you didn’t really read his entire comment. Either that or you missed the point.
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
13498 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:28 am to
quote:

As church membership continues to decline, so does the amount of money donated to the church. Self preservation says to open up to more people to bring more people into the church... Who hopefully bring more money. I would expect more of this in the future


This does seem as a plausible reason. However they are driving away many long timers members who actually tithe…..in an attempt to attract a new batch of people with no obligation to donate to the church.
This post was edited on 5/14/24 at 6:30 am
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16107 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:28 am to
quote:

Same reason they stopped backing slavery: religion changes over time.
what was the theological reasoning behind this I wonder? Considering slavery was legal in the Bible, and is never really condemned throughout since it was a common practice throughout the entire time the Bible takes place in.
This post was edited on 5/14/24 at 6:29 am
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15344 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:38 am to
Religion has always evolved to fit in with society because its a grift. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Posted by At Nowhere
East Baton Rouge Parish
Member since Jul 2018
144 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 6:40 am to
The collection plate doesn't discriminate.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48555 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 8:55 am to
I read his whole post. I thank him for his input. I'm glad that we had a chance to have this conversation. I understand his explanations.

I realize that our differences of opinion are irreconcilable.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16107 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:

I read his whole post.
you just seemed to not really understand what he was talking about is all. Like some of his points went directly over your head
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26668 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 9:14 am to
If you don't consider homosexual sex a sin, then it's all OK from there.

I am currently looking for a new church home because of this. I feel bad for the people who think they're going to find God by following that false gospel.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26668 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 9:23 am to
quote:

They are going to be cash rich.

You must pay a fee to leave and then negotiate the terms of the real estate.

It’s sickening.


Yup.

The Global Methodists are going to struggle, but at least they will still preach the actual Gospel.

Those remaining with the UMC are going to pat themselves on their backs and wave pride flags all the way to hell.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26668 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I'm not religious personally, but to say they're "living in sin this way" seems hypocritical. Isn't everyone living in sin to some extent according to most religions?


There is a huge difference between being a sinner and going to church to ask forgiveness and try to live a Christian life, and refusing to acknowledge what God has determined to be sinful. The queers have convinced too many that love is love, and their sinful ways aren't actually sinful.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
721 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Good thoughts. Thanks.

And thank you. I enjoy these conversations- as long as they are friendly. I bet you and I agree on much more than what we disagree on. Sure, the things we disagree on are important to us, but I believe them to be secondary issues that we can discuss in a respectful manner.

I agree with much of what you say; regarding sola scriptura being responsible for divisions and heresies- in the sense that if it didn’t exist… If you couldn’t own a Bible, then you couldn’t take it out of context or misapply its teachings. An analogy: Like guns, right? If you just took away all guns, (except from the government), then there would be no shootings, right? Right. But, people are gonna people- no matter what.

Blaming Sola Scriptura, instead of blaming those who mishandle it; is like blaming the gun instead of the shooter. A gun alone, kills no one. And, when used safely, properly, with good (true) judgment, and without ill intent- it is an indispensable tool that procures and maintains the life and safety of the innocent; and when in the wrong hands, causes often irreparable harm to the innocent. At bottom, the only thing that stops bad guys with guns, is good guys with guns.

The same goes for God’s Word. When someone, Protestant or Roman Catholic, rightly dispenses the intended teachings of the Bible- immeasurable benefit is received by those who hear, accept, understand and apply it. When someone, either intentionally or unintentionally, mishandles the Word (due to a failure in one of the aforementioned categories), unspeakable harm is the likely outcome. If the Word was treated with the reverence it deserves, by everyone, we wouldn’t have this problem. But, the problem is not with the Word, but those who handle it. I think we are in agreement on that last statement.

For well over 100 years before the reformation, people were translating and distributing the Bible. If it hadn’t been the reformation from within, it could have been chaos from without. I suppose we’ll never know if things would have been worse, or better, if the reformation had never happened. We can only speculate. But, it doesn’t require a giant leap in logic , or an all-inclusive understanding of human history, to postulate that the reformation may have done more good than harm- much like the Roman Catholic Church, itself.

A few questions (that you are free to ignore):
- Can someone, who is not a Roman Catholic, enter heaven? Under what circumstances?
- Can a professing Roman Catholic be sent to hell? Why or why not?
- Is the Bible the inspired, inerrant Word of God? How or how not?
- Where does Rome get its authority from? And, how do you know that it’s legitimate? Can you prove it?


quote:

Sure, the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages had two Popes for a bit. But the theology was the same throughout the whole world in all of Christendom,

Was it though? It seems like if that were true- there would have been no reformation. Can you provide documentation from the apostles that affirms the theology of the Middle Ages? Are we talking pre or post reformation?Do we have any extra biblical writings from Peter?

quote:

It's intellectually dishonest to argue that the two Popes is the same thing as the scores of different Protestant denominations, many of which believe some totally opposite morals and doctrine.

I agree with you. The point was more that there have always been divisions in the church- all the way back to the first century (1 Corinthians 11:18). Literally the only thing that hasn’t changed is the Bible. Theologies, doctrines and dogmas have all evolved over time, but the Bible has remained the same.

quote:

Protestantism has a big problem. It's broken into many pieces.

No doubt. But Christianity remains unfractured. If we stray from the truth then the truth is not in us.

quote:

You can ignore it. That's probably what is best for you. But, for thinking people

Somebody has a high opinion of himself.

quote:

This is because anybody can pick up a Bible and "find" a new interpretation that allows Gay Sex, or some other new idea.

No doubt. But also, anyone with a bible and an unperverted, unhindered desire for truth can refute heresy- using a proper, faithful, consistent exegesis of scripture. Anyone can take a couple of verses out of context, and derive “new” and “revolutionary” doctrines based on inconsistent interpretations. But, when held under the light of the overarching meta-narrative of the entirety of scripture- these false teachers are exposed as such, and only those who desire a false gospel will follow.

quote:

If some of the congregation don't like the new theology, they can branch off and start their own brand new Protestant denomination.

Like, a … reformation??? I’m just messing with you.

quote:

I say it's better to stick with Saint Thomas Aquinas's denomination. He was a smart guy. If Bible Alone was correct, Aquinas would have said so.

I love Aquinas. One of the greatest theologians of all time. But, he was not infallible. In the end, you scold Protestants for their acquiescence to the interpretations of fallible men- while deriving your own theology from (different) fallible men, yourself.
Posted by Klingler7
Houston
Member since Nov 2009
12040 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 7:26 pm to
Well…isn’t that special ?
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
721 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

Another fact, the UMC's own creed clearly states that it is a traditional Protestant Bible Alone/Faith Alone denomination.

I know plenty of guys who call themselves electricians. They’re not. They may fool non-electricians, but they don’t fool real electricians.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram