- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Calls Out The CIA - shite Is Getting Real
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:03 pm to MrLarson
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:03 pm to MrLarson
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
What does the law require?
What does the law require?
This post was edited on 9/28/19 at 6:04 pm
14
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:04 pm to bmy
If this individual were an actual whistleblower, the CIA would call for his execution.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:06 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
What does the law require?
According to Dems it doesn’t allow the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the USA to ask another sitting PRESIDENT if a US Politician was involved in a foreign corruption scandal. But anyone that doesn’t like Trump can file heresy complaints.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:07 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
What does the law require?
Hear say evidence is generally not admissible in court and as someone pointed out, the constitution gives us all the right, even the president, to face our accusers....
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:08 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
What does the law require?
Horse shite
Then any made up innuendo bullshite can get all the trappings of being from a hallowed "whistleblower".
That is the stupidest suggestion I have heard all day.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:14 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
In-fricking-credible.
quote:
What does the law require?
The 6th Amendment of that pesky Bill of Rights guarantees the accused the right to face his accuser.
That applies even to slime like you.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 6:38 pm to bmy
quote:Someone told me that you’re a pedophile and diddle your kids. I think I’m gonna file a WB complaint against you.
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 7:26 pm to bmy
quote:
What does the law require?
Apparently the law required first hand knowledge to qualify as a whistleblower. Until they changed the rules a week before this complaint was submitted.
Do u even read bro?
Posted on 9/28/19 at 8:25 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency
You think there is logic here.
There isn't.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 9:16 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency. What does the law require?
I'm not being hyperbolic, your posts are capable of inflicting brain damage on otherwise sane people. Good lord.
Posted on 9/28/19 at 9:57 pm to bmy
The reason a WB needs first hand info is to eliminate thousands of WB's saying "I heard it through the grapevine". Now people can claim they heard something and make up anything. Heresay is not allowed in a court of law. You set yourself up for many lawsuits if you retaliate against a person due to 2nd hand info.
This change to the WB Rule was to start Hoax 2.0 There is no other reason. The Deep State lost their Rushia collusion now they are trying Ukraine collusion.
In the end this will make them look worse than Hoax 1.0 and Kavanaugh X 10.
It is utterly absurd that anyone would want to impeach a prez due to a phone conversation in which he was requesting another prez honor a treaty between the 2 countries that was signed 20 years ago by Bill Clinton.
This change to the WB Rule was to start Hoax 2.0 There is no other reason. The Deep State lost their Rushia collusion now they are trying Ukraine collusion.
In the end this will make them look worse than Hoax 1.0 and Kavanaugh X 10.
It is utterly absurd that anyone would want to impeach a prez due to a phone conversation in which he was requesting another prez honor a treaty between the 2 countries that was signed 20 years ago by Bill Clinton.
Posted on 9/29/19 at 1:24 am to bmy
Nothing like a good manufactured complaint.
Posted on 9/29/19 at 1:38 am to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
I heard a guy say you raped someone.
You ready to go to jail? First hand knowledge isn't needed. Just trust what I said. Off to jail with you. At minimum my accusations should be taken as true and plastered all over your life. Even if we never get to a trial.
This post was edited on 9/29/19 at 1:40 am
Posted on 9/29/19 at 3:00 pm to bmy
quote:It does not require first hand knowledge. It just has to
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
What does the law require?
quote:
information which the employee or applicant reasonably believes evidences—
(i) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or
(ii) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;
Posted on 9/29/19 at 4:39 pm to bmy
quote:
The idea that a whistleblower complaint should require first hand knowledge is pro-corruption and anti-transparency.
Keep spinning your bullshite, you disingenuous little bitch.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News