Started By
Message

re: Coaches pay should be based on winning not on the possibility of winning

Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by SaveFarris
Member since Apr 2012
1741 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm to
And the sky should rain tacos and skittles.

But we don't live in that world and never have.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28497 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

It would be nice if the Contracts were low base pay with a high incentive pay, but we would never get a decent coach.


The irony is LSU HAD the opportunity to do just that with Orgeron. When he was hired in 2016 NO OTHER MAJOR SCHOOL IN AMERICA considered him even a candidate for their HC job. Thus, Orgeron had no negotiating leverage. His options were either take the LSU job at whatever salary LSU offered...or continue to not be a major conf. HC.

We can argue all day long as to if hiring him in the first place was a wise move. But the reality is his initial contract wasn't (relatively speaking) that onerous for LSU to bail out of if the hire didn't work out. It was ONLY when Woodward lost his mind following 2019 and gave Ed a huge raise and 6 year extension...despite O's market demand not significantly increasing...that LSU got stuck with a $17 million buyout when things quickly went south.

In the majority of instances the coach hold ALL of the leverage because he knows MULTIPLE schools will be willing to pay him big money for his services. If LSU won't give him what he demands...no sweat. He'll just stay where he's at or go to a school that will.

If you want to hire a guy who will agree to work on a contingency fee basis, then don't be upset when the only guys willing to accept such deals are guys desperate for a job whom no one else wants to hire.
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32697 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:19 pm to
The amount of money raised by the 19 national title will cover O’s buyout 10x over
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18158 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

It was ONLY when Woodward lost his mind following 2019 and gave Ed a huge raise and 6 year extension...despite O's market demand not significantly increasing...that LSU got stuck with a $17 million buyout when things quickly went south.
correct. NO OTHER SCHOOL was coming after O, so we didn't need to raise or extend him. Besides, the "model" didn't change - which was to underpay O and use the extra cash on hiring the best assistants.

So naturally LSU did the opposite - gave O a huge raise and hired newbie coordinators. Utter disaster.
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53178 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:37 pm to
Alleva’s MO
Posted by B00M
Member since Aug 2020
512 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:11 pm to
Good luck with that, I am sure the top coaches in the country will be beating the door down to sign up.

Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:13 pm to
Coaches pay is determined by what it takes to get a coach of the caliber you are trying to get

The end
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48019 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:16 pm to
The one football organization that bucks the market coincidentally wins more than any franchise in history.
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 2:17 pm
Posted by p&g
Dixie
Member since Jun 2005
12995 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:22 pm to
I agree

Incentivize them based on wins

9
10
11
12
Conf champ
Bowl game
Bowl champs
NC
Posted by DSPurpleandGold
Where it never rains
Member since Nov 2016
70 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 2:45 pm to
Which way is Utopia? I can’t find it.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
4550 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

none of us hate capitalism, but it doesn't bother you when a bad coach gets a massive buyout merely for failing?
You don't understand how that works. A bad coach gets the buyout because the university is BUYING OUT out the remainder of the contract. Nobody is forcing that. The university could just as well not payout the remaining years and allow the coach to fulfill the job for the amount of years he was hired on to do.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
4550 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Give the coach THE BIGGG BONUS for winning...next year is a new year....earn it again.
You're paying up not to lose the coach. A bonus wouldn't do that, but job security for future years would.
Posted by SaveFarris
Member since Apr 2012
1741 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

The one football organization that bucks the market coincidentally wins more than any franchise in history.


The one they have now (LaFleur) is underpaid, sure. But he's due for a giant bump within the next year or two.

And before that, 3 of the past 4 permanent HCs were market busters (Holmgren, Sherman, McCarthy). So your example actually invalidates your argument.

... Congrats?!?
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
4550 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

NO OTHER SCHOOL was coming after O, so we didn't need to raise or extend him.
It was in his contract to do so upon winning a title. You can't know beforehand if any other school would be interested in him or not.after winning a title.
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 3:07 pm
Posted by joe2679
Member since Nov 2015
626 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 4:08 pm to
What area of La La land are you from?
Posted by LuckyTiger57
Member since Dec 2015
1245 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 4:30 pm to
It’s kind of like being a weatherman. Your forecast is way off but you still get to keep your job.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58275 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 4:50 pm to
You would be a crappy agent and a worse AD.
Sorry it stinks sometimes with how it plays out, but this is the modern world we live in.
Posted by bayoubooga
Member since Oct 2021
236 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 5:31 pm to
I'm glad you're not doing the hiring.
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 5:32 pm
Posted by The King
Shakedown Street
Member since Aug 2005
1580 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 6:49 pm to
It's obviously not practical, but I understand the OP's point. There are, at all times, coaches making elite money for mediocre performance. That's screwed up. But the trade off here is that there is absolutely no loyalty from colleges to coaches. You can go from national championship to being fired in less than one year. Before anyone flames and says I'm an apologist for O, please chill. I think letting him go was the right decision. My only point, is that it's completely reasonable for coaches to demand big guaranteed contracts, because everyone knows that they're a season or two away from being fired at all times.
Posted by RightHook
Member since Dec 2013
5560 posts
Posted on 10/19/21 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

It ain't your money so stop fricking working about it.



these cringy arse people, always worried about other people's money.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram