Started By
Message

re: Caitlin Clark’s WNBA salary

Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21944 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

She’s already made over $3 million due to her NIL deals. She’ll be raking in a ton of cash through endorsements.
She needs to cash in now while she can. This is probably going to be the peak of her fame and popularity.

WNBA season will probably start off with lots of hype and interest, mainly because of Clark. But I think that interest probably fades as the season goes on. Late-season WNBA and their playoffs go up against the start of football season and MLB playoffs. She won't be one of the lead stories on ESPN every other day once that happens.
Posted by SWLA92
SWLA
Member since Feb 2015
1948 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:32 pm to
I know she probably wants to play in the WNBA but she’s a fool not to take Ice Cubes offer of $5 million to play for the Big 3. She’ll never make $5 million in here WNBA career
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
5558 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:40 pm to
She'll be raking in more endorsement dough if she gets picked for the Olympic team.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
3364 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:41 pm to
Atleast it's Indiana where the cost of living isn't insane. How do you live on that in NYC or LA?
Posted by Longhorn Actual
Member since Dec 2023
934 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:41 pm to
The WNBA is subsidized by the NBA and for all their lefty bullshite, you won't see any of those players giving up salary to compensate the WNBA players.

It's a losing business model. Expenses > Revenue. Negative unit economics. They quite literally cannot get people to pay more for the product than it costs them to provide it.

Nobody gives a shite about women playing basketball, just like nobody gives a shite about male models. The money goes where the value is.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51341 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

She'll be raking in more endorsement dough if she gets picked for the Olympic team.


She'll make the team just for the exposure I bet.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
1202 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:47 pm to
She will stick because the media wants her to stick. No one really gives a shite about women’s basketball but damn the media wants us to
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Member since Oct 2023
1393 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Are you sad a sanitation workers makes $50k?

Yes.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35595 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

2024: $76,535
2025: $78,066
2026: $85,873
2027 (fourth-year option): $97,582



Which begs the question, who paid for that ridiculous spectacle that was the WNBA draft? Acting like it was the Oscars. Well, we all know.... NBA pays TV, instead of the normal, other way around.

Keyshawn Johnson admitted, "I thought the WNBA players made at least $500k a year, I don't know why I thought that?"

You know why you thought that. The manufactured marketing lie about the league being sold to the public.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
1202 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 1:08 pm to
I’m sure there will be some white knights to come along and tell me how I’m an incel and I hate women but in reality most women just suck at basketball. I tried watching the LSU women’s team and their level of play is just subpar. If I enjoy basketball, why would I ever watch women’s basketball over men’s basketball unless I’m just trying to be equitable
Posted by OvertheDwayneBowe
Member since Sep 2016
2891 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

If my company made zero dollars, I'd make zero dollars. She's getting a good deal imo


It's a weird loop here in that Caitlin Clark the "brand" is clearly worth millions, but Caitlin Clark the player is not worth 10% of that.
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17301 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

I know she probably wants to play in the WNBA but she’s a fool not to take Ice Cubes offer of $5 million to play for the Big 3.


I was about to ask what became of that. Did she formally decline it or is that still on the table?
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17301 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

It's a weird loop here in that Caitlin Clark the "brand" is clearly worth millions, but Caitlin Clark the player is not worth 10% of that.


Eh that's true for the top of the line NBA players too. Just on a larger scale. Isn't Lebron's net worth north of a billion? His NBA salary is not even $50 mil, or not even 5% of his net worth
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
21546 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Doesn’t the WNBA lose money every year?


They'll be petitioning the government to subsidize the league soon.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33668 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:08 pm to
quote:


Not to mention, most players are single, and you have to live in cities that aren't cheap to live in

You can't live in New York for that salary
she actually hit the lottery going to Indianapolis. she'll do just fine off of that there i imagine (not counting for endorsements obviously)
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24966 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Late-season WNBA and their playoffs go up against the start of football season and MLB playoffs. She won't be one of the lead stories on ESPN every other day once that happens.


NEVER underestimate ESPN’s commitment to shove a fringe product down our throats. Especially if they have the TV rights to that product.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11180 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

I know she probably wants to play in the WNBA but she’s a fool not to take Ice Cubes offer of $5 million to play for the Big 3.


I was about to ask what became of that. Did she formally decline it or is that still on the tabl


im guessing it wasnt true. If so she'd be a fool not to take it, or at least try to do both WNBA and Big 3.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15356 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

NEVER underestimate ESPN’s commitment to shove a fringe product down our throats. Especially if they have the TV rights to that product


Is it really shoving down your throat? ESPN exists to display and promote sports. The WNBA is a sports league.
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Member since Oct 2023
1393 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Doesn’t the WNBA lose money every year? They are fortunate to be getting paid at all. I don’t say that as a hater either, just the reality of it.

Not even the LFL lost money every year...
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14313 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

2024: $76,535
2025: $78,066
2026: $85,873
2027 (fourth-year option): $97,582



That's just crazy. LA Lakers won their in-season tourney and each got $500,000. With ESPN carrying so many WNBA games and having regional TV, that king of chump change doesn't even make sense.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram