Started By
Message

re: History in Pictures is a great twitter feed. Here is one just posted.

Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:48 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89488 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:48 am to
quote:

It has enough of the 'look' of the M2/M3/M5 line to make me think it is in that family but the armament alone shows it predates them by a good bit.


Yeah - it's an M1 Combat Car - mid-30s - it is, more or less the immediate precursor to the M2.

And - after reviewing the Wiki - that appears to be an original M1 - the M1A1 and later variants had the octoganol turrent, rather than the D-shaped one pictured in the thread.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:02 am to


Thank you, sir.
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
54835 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:17 am to
Is that a Buffalo?

Army Air Corps?
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 10:18 am
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

While waiting for him, here is a plane for you:

Type/make/user



Grumman F2F-1 'Flying Barrel'. Almost identical to the F3F.

The user was the US Navy. More specifically, that aircraft is plane 6 of VF-2 and operated from the USS Lexington. You can get all that from the prewar side code 2-F-6. The first number is the squadron (2), the letter is the type (f = fighter), and the second number (6) is the aircraft id. Plane 6 of Fighting 2. Going a step further, squadrons and air wings were numbered based on their carrier. USS Lexington was CV-2, so her air group (2) consisted of VF-2 (fighters), VT-2 (torpedo), VB-2 (dive bombers), and VS-2 (Scout - really a second dive bomber squadron). The air wing/squadron number matching the carrier ended with the explosion of wings and carriers in WWII.


Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89488 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:28 am to
quote:

While waiting for him, here is a plane for you: Type/make/user


I'm not going to answer Spiff, but haven't we already had this plane in this thread?

Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

The user was the US Navy. More specifically, that aircraft is plane 6 of VF-2 and operated from the USS Lexington. You can get all that from the prewar side code 2-F-6. The first number is the squadron (2), the letter is the type (f = fighter), and the second number (6) is the aircraft id. Plane 6 of Fighting 2. Going a step further, squadrons and air wings were numbered based on their carrier. USS Lexington was CV-2, so her air group (2) consisted of VF-2 (fighters), VT-2 (torpedo), VB-2 (dive bombers), and VS-2 (Scout - really a second dive bomber squadron). The air wing/squadron number matching the carrier ended with the explosion of wings and carriers in WWII.


Most impressed, sir.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Is that a Buffalo?

Army Air Corps?


It and the F3F were replaced by the Buffalo, but they were the direct grandparents of the F4F Wildcat.

Edited to add: The F2F and FF-1 (they served at the same time) marked the start of a 53 year run where Grumman aircraft sailed on US Navy carriers. It ended when the Tomcat was retired in 2006.
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 10:37 am
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Most impressed, sir.


Like I said way upthread. Naval aviation and Pacific theater have been my thing for 40 years.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

It ended when the Tomcat was retired in 2006


And that was a damn shame for such a fine aircraft. Outpreformed and outclassed today's Hornet in all aspects. Glad I got the chance to see them fly on many occasions.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Naval aviation and Pacific theater have been my thing for 40 years.


Mine, too. Add in US ETO a/c, too.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:46 am to
quote:

I'm not going to answer Spiff, but haven't we already had this plane in this thread?


We may have and it might have either slipped my mind or was before I joined in. Not sure of either. My apologies, sir.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89488 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:47 am to
quote:

We may have and it might have either slipped my mind or was before I joined in. Not sure of either. My apologies, sir.


Heck, it may have been the F3F that was up before. Even if we had it (and I didn't check) it was new to some folks. So, don't mind me.

Carry on.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:49 am to
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:50 am to
For our resident plane nuts, what is this?

Posted by Traveler
I'm not late-I'm early for tomorrow
Member since Sep 2003
24255 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 10:52 am to
quote:

It ended when the Tomcat was retired in 2006.


God, I'm getting old. I remember when VF1 & VF2 deployed with the first group of Tomcats.

Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:14 am to
Heinkel He-162 Salamander or Volksjager.

It was supposed to be the low end of a high/low mix with the Me-262 - much like the USAF does with the F-15/F-16 and will do again with the F-22/F-35.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34622 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:16 am to
Grumman F3F. US Navy

eta, Close, but not quite.
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 11:18 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89488 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

For our resident plane nuts, what is this?


HE 162
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17463 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:16 am to
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34622 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:22 am to
quote:

It was supposed to be the low end of a high/low mix with the Me-262 - much like the USAF does with the F-15/F-16 and will do again with the F-22/F-35.


Also supposed to be flown by guys who had some glider training and a few hours in powered craft. Complete disaster, especially once the tail started falling off.
Jump to page
Page First 92 93 94 95 96 ... 165
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 94 of 165Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram