- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:05 pm to Asleepinthecove
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:05 pm to Asleepinthecove
quote:
Sibrel interviewed Gus Grissom’s wife who stated that Gus, the day before his death, said the mission wasn’t going to be able to make the timeline and that he saw what he thought was CIA operatives messing around the Apollo aircraft that exploded with him and 2 other astronauts in it.
Protect public image of a delay by killing your American astronauts instead. Makes sense
quote:
The van allen belt with the extensive radiation that would make it impossible with 1960’s technology for anyone to survive through it, much less live into their 80’s.
Tech that goes to space has always gotten extensive testing and hardening for the radiation exposure. You don't go to space and bring your PC or phone chip that certainly would have more issues in the belt
quote:
How can equipment survive the extensive heat on the moon. Polaroid pictures that would begin to disintegrate as soon as they are exposed to the surface of the moon?
The heat of what exactly, the surface? Surely you don't mean the 'air' surrounding the equipment...
quote:
The shadows from the pictures of the moon landing seem to contradict the moon landing and how true Sun shadows run parallel to each other vs different directions.
covered in this thread a few times
quote:
Buzz Aldrin who apparently brings back what was claimed to be a moon rock that was later analyzed to be petrified wood.
Somebody yoinked or never received a real one. Definitely enough to make you wonder what happened, but hardly any proof that moon rocks in general are fake or not around
quote:
Current AI technology has apparently analyzed the photos and said the pictures were a fake.
any credible source? Would love to read it (not sarcasm)
quote:
Elon Musk and other astrophysicist say that current missions to the moon would require 8 starship launches to fuel up a single moon trip.
Completely different fuel requirements for different spacecraft and lander size and weight. Also Elon may be talking in generalities here, not waiting for the the best earth-to-moon transfer window for efficiency
I'm glad people question things, as they should. But you should stay open minded and look for information, not confirmation.
Bonus: the guy on the podcast said there was a 50% chance to get hit by a meterorite per day, so after three days that meant "150%, aka certain death" ... lol
1
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:07 pm to shel311
quote:
China wasn't a 3rd world country around 2000
. Now you're either lying to yourself or just clueless. It can only be one, but factually speaking, it IS one. I'll let you figure out which one it is.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:09 pm to Asleepinthecove
quote:
I don’t understand the hatred for those who have some skepticism.
It's not hatred... it's just that the people who don't think we landed on the moon are stupid, and deserve to be ridiculed and made fun of. But not hatred.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:10 pm to Asleepinthecove
NASA admits they lost or accidentally destroyed the technology needed to go back to the moon which is why they haven’t been back. This just means they never went.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:18 pm to EventHorizon
quote:I've mentioned it a few times, short answer is nope
any credible source? Would love to read it (not sarcasm)
Sebril doesn't operate like that. Someone Ata conference in Russia said to Putin that Google neural networks said the pictures were fake but that is the extent of it entirely. Google has come out and said that didn't happen, and whatever person or Russian conference has never provided any proof, just that statement. Sebril doesn't care though, that's all he needs to pass it off as "fact"
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:21 pm to OrthoBro
quote:It's not the smoking gun proof they never went but it sure as shite should make folks scratch their heads and not just pretend there's a perfectly logical explanation for destroying the blueprints for the lunar module and all ts telemetry data.
NASA admits they lost or accidentally destroyed the technology needed to go back to the moon which is why they haven’t been back. This just means they never went
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:23 pm to shel311
Has Liberator found this thread yet?
His flat earther arse will go nuts.
His flat earther arse will go nuts.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:36 pm to Asleepinthecove
This guy is a wack job who spews stupidity.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:52 pm to Asleepinthecove
We did not land on the moon. Cold War bs. If we landed on the moon then, we’d regularly make trips now to practice for mars.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:54 pm to AUbagman
But 1972? Haven’t been back for a little manned landing practice since? Hmmmm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:59 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
It's not hatred... it's just that the people who don't think we landed on the moon are stupid, and deserve to be ridiculed and made fun of. But not hatred.
So Mars is the next step but we haven’t been back since we supposedly went in fricking 1972? Cars still had carburetor’s for gods sake.
This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:13 pm to shel311
quote:
That's my biggest question.
One poster tried, props to him for giving it a go. But no one has provided an explanation that makes logical sense as to why no other country has gone to the moon in the last 54 years.
There's a bunch of reasons why it would be beneficial to do so, so why haven't they done it?
The Apollo program cost about $250B in today's money. The primary goal for the U.S. was to be the first country to land a man on the moon as a source of national pride and to beat the Soviets. The amount of countries that could financially support an investment that size is very small and among those that could, what is the ROI for such a huge investment? That they get to be second?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:14 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Has Liberator found this thread yet?
Don't encourage him.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:32 pm to Asleepinthecove
They sure wasted a shite pile of real money on real tests if it was fake.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:58 pm to Asleepinthecove
quote:
Asleepinthecove
You're not gonna believe the name of the fake ship the Navy built that allegedly recovered several of the phony astronaut space ships supposedly returning from the moon. This proves....something....
quote:
Elon Musk and other astrophysicist say that current missions to the moon would require 8 starship launches to fuel up a single moon trip.
I'm pretty sure Elon Musk, the famous astrophysicist, helped build the fake Saturn V rockets launched to fool the American Public. I read about it on the internet and saw it on the YouTube.
Irrefutable photographic proof of the hoax.
Now ask yourself this: why does the Super Dome look like a flying saucer?
Yea. I'm suspicious too.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:43 pm to Tdot_RiverDawg
quote:
They sure wasted a shite pile of real money on real tests if it was fake.
Wasting a shite pile of real money is what our government does best.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:51 pm to Asleepinthecove
I don’t really care. Is that fair to say?
For the simple reason that the only reason this was done was to “win the space race.” Mainly because of the Cold War and the US didn’t want to look weak.
Looking back now there’s literally no benefit whatsoever to have gone back then. Other than to win a race. And what better way to win it than to fake it and spitting out American propaganda for national pride?
As long as a stupid MFer doesn’t come at me with flat earth nonsense, there’s a lot of things that if someone came to me and told me the US faked some BS for some reason or another, I wouldn’t be shocked at all.
For the simple reason that the only reason this was done was to “win the space race.” Mainly because of the Cold War and the US didn’t want to look weak.
Looking back now there’s literally no benefit whatsoever to have gone back then. Other than to win a race. And what better way to win it than to fake it and spitting out American propaganda for national pride?
As long as a stupid MFer doesn’t come at me with flat earth nonsense, there’s a lot of things that if someone came to me and told me the US faked some BS for some reason or another, I wouldn’t be shocked at all.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:52 pm to Tdot_RiverDawg
quote:
They sure wasted a shite pile of real money on real tests if it was fake.
This government? Waste money? The hell you say!
Posted on 4/27/24 at 12:49 am to Asleepinthecove
My biggest issue with these theories isn't always depends on NASA/deep state/gubmint/CIA/whoever Being brilliant enough to somehow pull all of this off but being too stupid to realize the flag moved when someone walked by it or to think about how the suns shadows would work
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:astroNOTs
question a lot of things, but not the moon landing.
Page 10 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News