- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Joe Rogan Podcast with Bart Sibrel - who here believes the Moon Landing was a hoax?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:45 am to Mr Breeze
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:45 am to Mr Breeze
quote:
You're not gonna believe the name of the fake ship the Navy built that allegedly recovered several of the phony astronaut space ships supposedly returning from the moon. This proves....something....
No one is refuting or skeptical that it took off and was in low earth orbit and came back down into the ocean. Watch the video where they claim the earth is at this great distance while filming through the window. The say in the video that the camera is up against the glass when it’s actually at a distance and the cabin is dark in an effort to make the earth look small and 130,000 feet away. Why lie about that?
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 1:47 am
Posted on 4/27/24 at 5:05 am to Asleepinthecove
That's the dumbest list of 'gotchas' I've ever seen = not one remotely germane comment in the entire list.
Not even note-worthy.
Hope you were not serious with the question. But I didn't note any semblance of sarcasm.
Not even note-worthy.
Hope you were not serious with the question. But I didn't note any semblance of sarcasm.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 6:20 am to AUbagman
quote:
So Mars is the next step but we haven’t been back since we supposedly went in fricking 1972?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 6:26 am to Asleepinthecove
I think Joe did a good job of refuting that. Look there is no doubt that they did things to make stuff look better/cooler. They probably even staged some of the videos to make it look good on TV. Idk if we went to the moon or not but this guy seems like he is trying to sell books.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:45 am to AUbagman
quote:
we’d regularly make trips now to practice for mars.
Do you believe we've really put a rover on Mars? Or is that fake as well?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:47 am to Azkiger
I wonder how many angry boomer heart attacks this thread caused
Next op will say that we shouldn’t give 90% of our tax dollars to Israel
ETA: and if you don’t believe the moon landing you’re racist because it was all black women doing the math or whatever
Next op will say that we shouldn’t give 90% of our tax dollars to Israel
ETA: and if you don’t believe the moon landing you’re racist because it was all black women doing the math or whatever
This post was edited on 4/27/24 at 7:51 am
Posted on 4/27/24 at 7:58 am to el Gaucho
quote:
Next op will say that we shouldn’t give 90% of our tax dollars to Israel
Have you done the math to see what % of our budget goes to Israel?
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:00 am to Asleepinthecove
quote:
No one is refuting or skeptical that it took off and was in low earth orbit and came back down into the ocean. Watch the video where they claim the earth is at this great distance while filming through the window. The say in the video that the camera is up against the glass when it’s actually at a distance and the cabin is dark in an effort to make the earth look small and 130,000 feet away. Why lie about that?
So we can takeoff and land but can't get to the Moon?
It takes a special kind of idiot to think that,,
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:13 am to Asleepinthecove
Absolutely amazing that people still actually believe that the government tells them the truth. ??????
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:18 am to PsychedelicTiger
quote:
Absolutely amazing that people still actually believe that the government tells them the truth. ??????
No. But just becaue the Govt said something 60 years ago, that doesnt mean its fake by default.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:19 am to Ancient Astronaut
quote:When Alex Jones turned out to be right on the "turning the frogs gay" thing. . .it fricked me up, ngl.
I question everything now.
Since then, I question everything
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:28 am to Azkiger
quote:
Have you done the math to see what % of our budget goes to Israel?
Good point
We always run a deficit so it must be more than 100%
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:34 am to suavecito80
quote:
-Kennedy assasination -Iraq War second time (I actually was there in 2003) -Covid
Add the Gulf of Tonkin to get us in the Vietnam War.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:37 am to JodyPlauche
quote:
You are the one who believes Neil A. (Alien spelled backwards) rode on a rocket ship to the Moon with another guy who's mother's maiden name just happened to be Moon. And the best part...returned home safely!!! Give me a break.
Neil A. (Alien spelled backwards)
Now this is peak OT investigative journalism right here. I mean how much more evidence do you guys need.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:43 am to AUbagman
quote:
But 1972? Haven’t been back for a little manned landing practice since? Hmmmm
It was much more valuable to take the money needed to go hop around the moon collecting rocks, and instead launch 1000 satellites to spy on Russians and eventually Americans.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:47 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
quote:
China wasn't a 3rd world country around 2000
. Now you're either lying to yourself or just clueless. It can only be one, but factually speaking, it IS one. I'll let you figure out which one it is.
Thanks for posting that MoarKilometers. For comparison, US GDP per capita in 2000 was $36,329, as compared to China in 2000 with $959. That's not even @shel311's monthly EBT payment, and was 3rd world by any standard.
Zimbabwe, Nicaragua, and Papua New Guinea were all better than China in 2000, along with a hundred or so other countries. Now in 2022, their per capita $12,720, ours is $76,329, placing us 7th on the planet, and the largest country by far in the top 30, while China languishes in 70th place, sandwiched between Costa Rica and Malaysia, with Turkmenistan and Kazakstan only a place or three back.
You've lost every point shel. Keep it up, I'm enjoying the opportunity to educate others on this topic.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:51 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:The consequences of the media and government lying to us will be severe in that case. This is why our institutions should work to earn our trust, but they don’t even care anymore. We are continuously lied to and manipulated.
Its going to suck if fast spreading virus that has fatality rate of say 5-15% really does hit in this generation and we need to act fast to contain it. No one will believe the warnings.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:51 am to AUbagman
Please pick another school to root for. You're a disgrace to a University that produced seven astronauts, and untold legions of engineers who solved the problems that needed to be solved to put America in space, starting with the AU grad who fixed the chronic instability problems that plagued the first F-1 prototypes and nearly killed the entire program.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 8:55 am to Asleepinthecove
I only have inside information on two of these, but they are so incorrect technically that he's lost all credibility. I'll caveat by saying I haven't listened to the podcast yet, but I will...
What does this have to do with anything? I mean really, I've told some of you Musk humpers that Starship is not optimized for a moon mission, it's optimized for Low Earth orbit Starlink launches. Second, 8 launches???!!!! The official number is 16, and there are several credible analyses that show it can creep over 20. I'll be honest, one thing I didn't anticipate with Musk's epic Starship failures is that it would retroactively create more moon landing deniers.
This is actually a decent question, but with very modest googling he'd have been able to debunk himself. First, one of the main things that makes modern electronics susceptible to radiation are their small size and density. We didn't have that problem in the Apollo days as integrated circuits were still years away from widespread use, although the main guidance computer on Apollo did use early ICs that were not very dense, therefore not as susceptible to radiation as modern chips. The other thing is that radiation events happen in cycles (they last about 11 years), and the Van Allen belts are not a constant amount of radiation from earth to the moon. We've looked at Apollo's trajectories compared to solar cycles, and compared to worst case Van Allen belt radiation, and discovered that while the Apollo folks knew that this radiation existed, they got pretty lucky in when they launched (solar cycle minimums for the most part) and their critical ops (engine burns, dockings, EVAs) tended to dodge the worst case areas of the Van Allen belts. We think this was mostly by chance as some of these environmental aspects wouldn't be discovered for another 20 years. And as for human exposure, the shielding of the spacecraft was enough to give decent protection given that they launched in a solar minimum. Today, for example, we can measure radiation events with GOES satellites, and will scrub launches if there is a solar flare etc. that causes excessive radiation. And as I said before our electronics are way more sensitive to radiation today than they were in the 50's and 60's.
quote:
Elon Musk and other astrophysicist say that current missions to the moon would require 8 starship launches to fuel up a single moon trip.
What does this have to do with anything? I mean really, I've told some of you Musk humpers that Starship is not optimized for a moon mission, it's optimized for Low Earth orbit Starlink launches. Second, 8 launches???!!!! The official number is 16, and there are several credible analyses that show it can creep over 20. I'll be honest, one thing I didn't anticipate with Musk's epic Starship failures is that it would retroactively create more moon landing deniers.
quote:
The van allen belt with the extensive radiation that would make it impossible with 1960’s technology for anyone to survive through it, much less live into their 80’s.
This is actually a decent question, but with very modest googling he'd have been able to debunk himself. First, one of the main things that makes modern electronics susceptible to radiation are their small size and density. We didn't have that problem in the Apollo days as integrated circuits were still years away from widespread use, although the main guidance computer on Apollo did use early ICs that were not very dense, therefore not as susceptible to radiation as modern chips. The other thing is that radiation events happen in cycles (they last about 11 years), and the Van Allen belts are not a constant amount of radiation from earth to the moon. We've looked at Apollo's trajectories compared to solar cycles, and compared to worst case Van Allen belt radiation, and discovered that while the Apollo folks knew that this radiation existed, they got pretty lucky in when they launched (solar cycle minimums for the most part) and their critical ops (engine burns, dockings, EVAs) tended to dodge the worst case areas of the Van Allen belts. We think this was mostly by chance as some of these environmental aspects wouldn't be discovered for another 20 years. And as for human exposure, the shielding of the spacecraft was enough to give decent protection given that they launched in a solar minimum. Today, for example, we can measure radiation events with GOES satellites, and will scrub launches if there is a solar flare etc. that causes excessive radiation. And as I said before our electronics are way more sensitive to radiation today than they were in the 50's and 60's.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 9:02 am to TigerGman
All you moon landing denying idiots explain this fake, CGI?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News