Started By
Message

re: Budget comparisons between St George & other Louisiana cities

Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:44 am to
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:44 am to
quote:

I have consistently said the proposed budget of the new city of St George is unrealistic and is being purposefully low-balled by the organizers in order to keep from losing support.


If you truly believe they are lying about this, you should be doing something other than posting on TD about it.
For example, providing this information to them and telling them to their faces to stop lying.

Also, did you just say that EBR's budget is more than 10 times greater than that of Lake Charles?
Posted by NorthEnd
Member since Oct 2007
2149 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:45 am to
i hate being the last post on a page
Posted by NorthEnd
Member since Oct 2007
2149 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:47 am to
Russian--since we disagree on the revenue, answer me this--what specifically will cost StG residents more if they incorporate? In other words--we will we need to pay for that we don't already pay for?
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:49 am to
quote:

My guess is they wouldn't mind paying more, if they actually got something in return and saw a better use of their tax dollars.

Why is this so hard to understand.


It's hard to understand because you won't specify what increased services you are expecting to receive.

St George has adequate public works and police. St George has received more road improvements and infrastructure investments than any other part of the parish. Look at all the roads that were widened + shoulders or flat out extended.

Be specific as to what services you want.

Kip is giving his annual State of the Parish speech today, I think.
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 11:50 am
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25395 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:50 am to
Schools.....but that won't technically come with incorporation. It will take at least a year or two to set a school district up. St George needs a new high school and a new middle school.

Again....this is independent of incorporation. The new school district will take at least a year to setup- perhaps even more.

My suburb just split off from the Shelby County district. We had to raise sales taxes 1/2 cent. I think it's worth it.

Also....A blind comparison of city budgets is useless without detailing what new public services will be provided.
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 12:00 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36179 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:51 am to
Before you compare expenditures for each city, it's fair to tell us what is in each budget.

For instance St. George's proposed budget doesn't include any money for fire protection because the area already has fire services provided by other entities.

Review the St. George budget LINK and it tells you what they include.

Now I am not going to tell you or anyone else whether it's realistic or whatever; but I think before you start comparing budgets of each city it is best to see what they include.

For instance I did a quick check and Lake Charles includes fire protection in their budget. Wouldn't that be a factor when you look at expenditures per capita? Sure it would be a factor.

Now, I do agree that St. George's numbers should be carefully checked and that they are very important, but looking at other cities and then saying that per capita St. George's numbers are bogus isn't sound financial analysis.
Posted by NorthEnd
Member since Oct 2007
2149 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 11:57 am to
My point is--if we have to build schools, why is that? If we were adequately represented would we not already have enough schools for our area?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

In fact they've been clear that there is "no guarantee that taxes won't need to be raised".
That is the exact opposite of what is stated on their website.

quote:

Q: Will my taxes go up if we incorporate?

A: Taxes shouldn’t have to be raised to support a new city.
LINK
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25395 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:03 pm to
That's a very good point that some refuse to acknowledge.

There is inadequate public school infrastructure in the southern part of the parish- which has been the growth area for decades. You can check the school district maps and see who is being bused all the way to mid city for middle school and Tara for high school.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36179 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

That is the exact opposite of what is stated on their website.


And the organizers should be challenged on that fact. If a tax increase is inevitable voters should know that.

But your budget comparisons don't prove that because they fail to look at the entire picture.

St. George won't be providing fire protection, garbage pick up, sewer treatment or any of the other services which are already provided by other organizations.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

If you truly believe they are lying about this, you should be doing something other than posting on TD about it.
How do you know I'm not doing something about it other than posting on TD?

quote:

For example, providing this information to them and telling them to their faces to stop lying.
That will be done before a vote is held.

quote:

Also, did you just say that EBR's budget is more than 10 times greater than that of Lake Charles?
Yes, so? Lake Charles is a city. EBR is not just the city of Baton Rouge.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36179 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

That's a very good point that some refuse to acknowledge. There is inadequate public school infrastructure in the southern part of the parish- which has been the growth area for decades. You can check the school district maps and see who is being bused all the way to mid city for middle school and Tara for high school


They have acknowledge that if a new school district comes to pass then new schools would need to be constructed. Voters need to consider how that is to be paid for before they vote.

BTW, they could form a new city and never get their new school system, and they would have toremain in the old one.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25395 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Q: Will my taxes go up if we incorporate?

A: Taxes shouldn’t have to be raised to support a new city.


You have interwebs. You can look up St. George meetings and educate yourself. People have asked that same question as you numerous times. The response of organizers is that there is "no guarantee that taxes won't increase".

Organizers think that they can incorporate without raising taxes. I have not seen any evidence that proves their estimates as illogical. I do think taxes will have to increase to pay for public schools. Public school districts will occur independent of incorporation....at least a year after, perhaps more.

My conclusion through everything I've read about this issue is that St. George organizers are probably correct in their calculation that incorporation won't require a tax hike. After incorporation, public schools will be the first major push of this new city. I think a tax hike to pay for much needed public school infrastructure in the southern part of the parish is next to impossible to avoid - especially if East Baton Rouge Parish is successful in stealing sales tax revenue generated in the new municipality or if Baton Rouge annexes Bluebonnet and Siegen (which will upset voters in Zachary, Central, and St. George).
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 12:18 pm
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20509 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

My point is--if we have to build schools, why is that? If we were adequately represented would we not already have enough schools for our area?



Are the schools currently overcrowded?

A lot of SG proponents have pointed to the fact that there is only one high school in the area as proof of neglect or inadequate representation, but if the current high school is covering all the students enrolled in that area, then why would they build another one?
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20509 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

StG effectively has taxation without representation in the current scenario. It's incredibly frustrating. The disparity between %of tax dollars paid and % of benefits is great. Simple things like # of libraries and parks are a microcosm of the problem. 2 of EBR's 20 libraries are in STG, but it represents somewhere between 62and 73% of the revenue depending on what source you look at.



Can you provide your sources for these claims??
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25395 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

A lot of SG proponents have pointed to the fact that there is only one high school in the area as proof of neglect or inadequate representation, but if the current high school is covering all the students enrolled in that area, then why would they build another one?


Some of their students are bused to mid city for middle school and Tara for high school. Legit concern, IMO...especially with respect to the middle school students. That's not a short distance especially in Baton Rouge traffic. The middle school attendance zone for the area south of I-10 is nuts.

To remedy this problem, they think St. George will need another high school and at least one new middle school (probably around Burbank/Highland or around Siegen/Perkins). Neither of those facilities are going to be cheap. They may not have to raise taxes to incorporate, but they will likely have to generate more revenue if they want to borrow to build those schools...although it will be great for students and parents in the end as well as property values in southern East Baton Rouge.
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 12:27 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Before you compare expenditures for each city, it's fair to tell us what is in each budget.

The St George 'budget' is so lacking in details I don't know what it really includes. Just look at the "Public Services" line. It's a mystery what all it includes or how the numbers were derived.

As I've posted before, I don't see where their budget includes any funds for street or bridge construction. ZERO funds. Want a new turn lane built so you can turn right on red? Sorry, no money. Want a new bridge to get into your subdivision to replace the one that's falling down? Sorry, no money.

My OP was an attempt to measure the "reasonableness" of the SG budget not its absolute accuracy. It is in no way a detailed analysis of every city's budget.

I compiled the numbers on other Louisiana cites and not one of them even came close to the per capita numbers for SG. Not within 50% of their per capita numbers. Some cities were more than triple the per capita spending rate of SG. I knew those numbers would be criticized so I deleted them from my spreadsheet.

If SG residents want to believe that their city is so unique that the new government can supply adequate city services as the residents in other La. cities receive from their city government at a 50%+ discount in taxes, then I have a bridge over the Mississippi River I'd like to sell them.....for them to use in their new city, of course, that is if they can find the money in their budget to buy it.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

St. George won't be providing fire protection, garbage pick up, sewer treatment or any of the other services which are already provided by other organizations.
What?

I mean.......WHAT?!?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

You can look up St. George meetings and educate yourself. People have asked that same question as you numerous times. The response of organizers is that there is "no guarantee that taxes won't increase".
So what they say at meetings is not consistent with what they have on their official website. What does that tell you about them?

quote:

I have not seen any evidence that proves their estimates as illogical.
Okey, dokey.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25395 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

What?


There's a dedicated tax already in place for some of those services....although I'm not sure what beyond fire.
quote:

I knew those numbers would be criticized so I deleted them from my spreadsheet.


How transparent of you. You've given out great info in some of the money board threads. I'm sure your spreadsheet isn't that far off. Why don't you share them?
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 12:33 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram