- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/25/24 at 11:51 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Justice Kaylani Prescott Angry Brown done made up her mind, girl. She ain’t taking no shite from no white man.
She sounded waaayyyyyyyy too personal. Like she was part of the prosecution.
Cuz Trump an his supporter be why suppremaciss, yo. She ain't wit dat.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 11:53 am to moneyg
After the argument ended... Good Lawgic is like "I think it'll end up 5-4 or 5-3 (in Trump's favor) with ACB doing her own thing"
Posted on 4/25/24 at 11:58 am to TDTOM
quote:
Why?
It would delay things because it would have to go through lower courts.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:00 pm to RAB
I'm not exactly sure how many sides that DOJ dude has to his mouth.
At one point he was talking about how no scheme is perfect and in closing he was arguing that the current scheme is just fine and any changes would undermine the status quo.
Not to mention the absolute acrobatic entanglements the DOJ is putting forward to argue that there is a discernable difference between public and private acts by the Executive in some cases but, wait for it, not in others.
And they are still using stale arguments, like setting up contingent Electors in AZ - which is not illegal in any sense, to provide foundation of intent or motive. I found it especially enjoyable when the guy contradicted himself about eleventy-hundred times to avoid addressing any diffinitive tests for intent or motive.
The coup-de-gras was a lame attempt to assure errybody that this is a one-off and no worries because of reasons. Reasons that apparently include the good behavior and judgement that will be extorted from future Executives by allowing the DOJ to destroy Trump.
What a shite show...
At one point he was talking about how no scheme is perfect and in closing he was arguing that the current scheme is just fine and any changes would undermine the status quo.
Not to mention the absolute acrobatic entanglements the DOJ is putting forward to argue that there is a discernable difference between public and private acts by the Executive in some cases but, wait for it, not in others.
And they are still using stale arguments, like setting up contingent Electors in AZ - which is not illegal in any sense, to provide foundation of intent or motive. I found it especially enjoyable when the guy contradicted himself about eleventy-hundred times to avoid addressing any diffinitive tests for intent or motive.
The coup-de-gras was a lame attempt to assure errybody that this is a one-off and no worries because of reasons. Reasons that apparently include the good behavior and judgement that will be extorted from future Executives by allowing the DOJ to destroy Trump.
What a shite show...
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:00 pm to LSU Patrick
I would rather them just say he has immunity and tell Jack Smith to go play in traffic. Is that not an option?
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:19 pm to SoggyBottomBaw
everything you said is exactly how I took it listening to some of it. but was waiting for the experts to opine. Dreeben was all over the place like a gay man at an orgy in line to get a blow job.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:21 pm to TDTOM
It sounded like they may rule that way on official acts as POTUS, but not on personal acts.
But that could also mean sending this back to the lower courts with instructions.
But that could also mean sending this back to the lower courts with instructions.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:24 pm to SoggyBottomBaw
quote:
The coup-de-gras was a lame attempt to assure errybody that this is a one-off and no worries because of reasons.
This keeps coming back up in various areas.
Say “selective prosecution” without saying “selective prosecution.”
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:07 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
I think you make very good points about trying to get trump while trying to shield biden by using a case by case approach rather than broad immunity.
In listening to the last hour of the hearing, I do believe there is a larger, more serious coup at play. The dept of justice wants vague requirements that only the dept of justice can explain. The doj person went so far as to say a president has to solicit an opinion from the attny general prior to acting to avoid being called a criminal. So now we have 4 branches of govt. President, congress, Supreme Court and the DOJ bureaucracy . The power shift is completely from the President to the DOJ for the next hundred years
In listening to the last hour of the hearing, I do believe there is a larger, more serious coup at play. The dept of justice wants vague requirements that only the dept of justice can explain. The doj person went so far as to say a president has to solicit an opinion from the attny general prior to acting to avoid being called a criminal. So now we have 4 branches of govt. President, congress, Supreme Court and the DOJ bureaucracy . The power shift is completely from the President to the DOJ for the next hundred years
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 1:08 pm
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News