- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump, Contempt and the Secret Service
Posted on 4/19/24 at 2:58 pm to OzonaOkapi
Posted on 4/19/24 at 2:58 pm to OzonaOkapi
All this talk about the SS and former presidents reminded me of the movie "Guarding Tess" with Nicolas Cage. Pretty entertaining.
0
Posted on 4/19/24 at 4:40 pm to OzonaOkapi
I would say in general, if we start allowing states to prosecute former presidents we are sliding down a very slippery slope.
Especially states where in the AG as a candidate campaigned on getting said former president.
Especially states where in the AG as a candidate campaigned on getting said former president.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 4:44 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:Obama kills someone tomorrow in Houston. No prosecution?
I would say in general, if we start allowing states to prosecute former presidents we are sliding down a very slippery slope.
If so, where do you draw the line between that case and the current Trump case? On what basis?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 4:49 pm to OzonaOkapi
Welcome to the Union of Soviet Socialist America (USSA). Complete with the USSA's version of this...........
"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" - Lavrentiy Beria
"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" - Lavrentiy Beria
Posted on 4/19/24 at 4:56 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
and not jail him
“warden threw a party in the county jail”
Posted on 4/19/24 at 5:13 pm to OzonaOkapi
quote:
Number of Posts:231
Registered on:4/15/2024
I recognize OzonaOkapi's particular writing style.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 6:58 pm to OzonaOkapi
So murder = an agreed upon business arrangement that’s been shown legal in dozens of instances?
Murder = a situation where a law had to be retroactively applied to even get to the sham trial phase?
Is there a reason your Obama murder case couldn’t be a federal trial?
Murder = a situation where a law had to be retroactively applied to even get to the sham trial phase?
Is there a reason your Obama murder case couldn’t be a federal trial?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:16 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Trump should tell the judge to frick off and walk out.
This should have already happened. Him playing along makes it look real.
Posted on 4/19/24 at 9:30 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:No, for purposes of this discussion, felony conviction beyond reasonable doubt = felony conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
So murder = an agreed upon business arrangement that’s been shown legal in dozens of instances? Murder = a situation where a law had to be retroactively applied to even get to the sham trial phase?
This post was edited on 4/19/24 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:30 pm to OzonaOkapi
The point of an ankle monitor is to know where a subject is. What’s the point when the SS is always by his side?
Posted on 4/19/24 at 10:45 pm to USAFTiger42
quote:
It's not crazy to think the ankle monitor thing can end up causing an incident which removes Trump and leaves the GOP scrambling
At that point it’s over. If Trump can’t win no non dem will ever win.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 7:09 am to OzonaOkapi
Posted on 4/20/24 at 9:41 am to OzonaOkapi
quote:
No, for purposes of this discussion, felony conviction beyond reasonable doubt = felony conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
So what felony has been discussed in this thread? Contempt is not a felony.
I'll make it simple. I believe ANY criminal charges raised against a former president should be handled through the impeachment process.
The House has the hearing and the Senate is the jury. It should be unreasonably difficult to charge AND convict a former president. States should not be allowed to do it because we end up with the monkey show trial we have now.
I am opposed to that for either party.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 9:57 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
I'll make it simple. I believe ANY criminal charges raised against a former president should be handled through the impeachment process.
The only reason this is truly an issue is because they are trying to corruptly prosecute him over made up dumb shite. If he had actually truly done something then every normal person would be fine with figuring out a way to hold him or anyone accountable.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News