Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why weren’t the electors who attempted to give away Trump election votes in 2016 indicted?

Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:57 pm
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
805 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:57 pm
quote:

In the 2016 United States presidential election, ten members of the Electoral College voted or attempted to vote for a candidate different from the ones to whom they were pledged.[1] Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.[1]

LINK
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98903 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:03 pm to
It's (D)ifferent
Posted by Epaminondas
The Boot
Member since Jul 2020
4193 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:05 pm to
Because no Republican prosecutor sought an indictment (because the Republican Party never does shite).

You're not going to talk the Left into playing fair.
Posted by RedStickFox
Member since Sep 2022
211 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:27 pm to
Hillary lost more votes through fathless electors than trump did.

Not everything is a grand conspiracy.
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4330 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:29 pm to
None of the people charged today were faithless electors. These situations aren't similar.
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
805 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

None of the people charged today were faithless electors. These situations aren't similar.


Yea they tried to certify Trump as the winner and Clinton’s gave Trump elector votes to others.

Completely different in no way trying to obtain the same results
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32889 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:33 pm to
Trump’s appointments to the DOJ didn’t do shite
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4330 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Yea they tried to certify Trump as the winner and Clinton’s gave Trump elector votes to others.



I'm not sure what this means.

quote:

Completely different in no way trying to obtain the same results



That's exactly right. Completely different.

Two people walk into a bank. One man withdraws money. One man uses a gun and steals money. Same result but completely different.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422807 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:45 pm to
Faithless electors are different than fake electors
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram