- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
FalseProphet
Favorite team: | LSU |
Location: | Mecca |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 11707 |
Registered on: | 12/15/2011 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Federal Prosecutors are now PLEADING the 5th when asked "Did you break the law"!
Posted by FalseProphet on 5/2/24 at 11:09 am
It'll generate some headlines, but those were some pretty loaded questions that [i]should[/i] make even innocent parties invoke the Fifth.
Did you break the law? If he says, "no," and they find some obscure law that has no significance to the case, then they claim perjury. If someone asked if you...
re: LA HB 461 - (Government proposal to hide records from public)
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/5/24 at 12:42 pm
Two responses to this bill:
1) This exception already exists for LED, so it’s not a completely new idea.
2) The bill goes too far to fill a gap that absolutely needs to be filled. I’ve worked on municipal economic development projects, and they are HARD to work on. Companies have a disincentiv...
re: What percentage of lawyers do you think are D voters?
Posted by FalseProphet on 3/28/24 at 12:52 pm
[quote]Crim - 85%+
Insurance defense - 50%
L&E - 80%
PI - 85%
Other commercial lit - 50%
M&A/CRE/etc - 50%
Immigration - 95%[/quote]
I think that's probably close to accurate, although I think the Insurance Defense might be lower (35%).
You don't have government attorneys, wh...
re: 2024- LA Legislature Tort Reform Bills
Posted by FalseProphet on 3/13/24 at 7:42 pm
Why can’t they just make the prescriptive period for MVAs and slip and falls 2 years without screwing with my nice 1 year period?
...
re: St. George Oral Arguments Before LA Supreme Court - Today
Posted by FalseProphet on 1/23/24 at 10:56 am
That was a pretty lackluster standing argument. I'd have swung with a more engaging attorney....
re: Ticket Giveaway: Winners Announced...see first page
Posted by FalseProphet on 12/15/23 at 1:46 am
In...
re: Netanyahu rejects cease-fire with Hamas; says, 'This is a time for war'
Posted by FalseProphet on 10/30/23 at 1:14 pm
[quote]Or is Netanyahu really saying there are no terms for cease fire he will accept?[/quote]
The only term should be unconditional surrender....
re: Louisiana voters, who has your vote for governor?
Posted by FalseProphet on 10/8/23 at 3:49 pm
[quote]Didn’t want Wilson to get 50% of the vote with all of the Republicans in the running splitting votes.[/quote]
Someone doesn’t know how to math.
Voted for Wags. I am convinced that Landry is Jindal without being nearly as smart. That’s scary as shite....
re: The Kraken Has Been Released
Posted by FalseProphet on 8/24/23 at 8:51 am
I always thought it was hilarious that people put their faith in Sidney Powell. She wasn't a good lawyer before, during, or after. :lol:...
re: Liz Murrill captures endorsement of Louisiana Republican Party in attorney general's race
Posted by FalseProphet on 8/3/23 at 10:57 am
[quote]I’ve heard a lot of good things about her[/quote]
I'm actually genuinely curious as to what that is. She hasn't fared very well in the cases that matter (SCOTUS), and I have never been impressed by any of her arguments I've listened to.
It's not enough to be a mouthpiece when you aren't...
re: Fulton County Superior Court can't rule on Trump attempt to disqual DA Fani Willis
Posted by FalseProphet on 7/24/23 at 8:25 am
[quote]Pretty SOP for judges who routinely deal with that prosecutor's office, when having to rule on recusal of that prosecutor.[/quote]
Is that standard in LC? As far as I'm aware, that's not the practice at all in my JDC (although non-trivial motions to recuse a prosecutor are rare up here)....
re: First Turkey Hunt Questions
Posted by FalseProphet on 5/1/23 at 10:53 am
[quote]camo shirt and jeans[/quote]
Saw an old redneck kill a turkey once wearing a black wife beater and some jeans.
I would never. :lol:...
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:20 pm
I’d love to know what law school taught you that was called a merits trial. It’s called an appeal.
For those lost in the argument, the trial court finds facts. The appellate court is then bound by those facts absent error by the trial court. The appellate court can then apply those facts to leg...
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:17 pm
What part of this is going to be a merits trial in the Fourth Circuit? You think they are going to decide factual issues on appeal under a de novo review standard? That’s laughable....
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:15 pm
Court of appeals review grants of summary judgment de novo. They don’t review trials de novo. If that was the case, we’d skip the jury and go straight to the appeals courts.
Your edit came after I was posting. Of course it isn’t. But the facts are going to factor in heavily here. It won’t be a “m...
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:12 pm
Not from a trial. De novo review is on summary judgment....
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:09 pm
They don’t held merits trials in appellate courts. What are you talking about?...
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:07 pm
I think you are the one who didn’t read the ruling. The case was tried - not just a trial on an injunction quickly. The state prevailed.
This was on an actual appeal. Not an appeal of a preliminary injunction. The Fourth entered an injunction on appeal with nary a word why.
And I know they don...
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 5:02 pm
[quote]Nope. The court denied emergency relief from the 4th Circuit ruling, on procedural grounds.[/quote]
Considering the Supreme Court (like the 4th Circuit) gave absolutely no reason for its ruling, you have no idea why they did what they did.
And, it gave a specific transgender individual ...
re: Supreme Court won’t let WV segregate teams by sex.
Posted by FalseProphet on 4/6/23 at 2:19 pm
We should just stay every law until courts have decided whether we can actually have them, right? Especially when courts don’t tell us why they are enjoining them....
Popular