Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on the RaDonda Vaught (nurse convicted of negligent homicide) trial?

Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28624 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:28 pm to
Isn't that the chick from SNL?
This post was edited on 3/29/22 at 3:31 pm
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
5095 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Some of the worst ER nurses I’ve worked with ended up becoming NPs. Being a good nurse is in no way a prerequisite for becoming a NP, especially when many of those schools have 100% acceptance rates.



True, although program and specialty differ in quality. I find the Acute Care trained NP is superior to the FNP training. Market is so flooded, it seems graduates from less desirable schools are getting weeded out.
This post was edited on 3/29/22 at 3:34 pm
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4568 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

They hardly ever go to jail for it
It's a mandatory 2 year sentence if the victim is under 10 y/o.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
4946 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Some of the worst ER nurses I’ve worked with ended up becoming NPs. Being a good nurse is in no way a prerequisite for becoming a NP, especially when many of those schools have 100% acceptance rates.



Well, there's always bad performers in any role. There are terrible physicians. Cool.

I'll bet some of the best nurses you worked with were told, "You should go to NP/PA or CRNA school." The ones that don't likely just don't have the ambition to do it. It's not a slight against them. I'm just saying that people recognize talent and intelligence and generally want to see those people apply themselves to reach a higher position.

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
97003 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:44 pm to
There is “accident” and there is “pure fricking negligence”.


And I’m pretty sure nurses have a lot of issues disclosing their own errors as of now, regardless of what these individuals say. They just don’t want to get their arse caught in a sling when being careless catches up with them.
Posted by CockyDawg MD
Charleston, SC
Member since Dec 2017
33 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:58 pm to
Basic breakdown of events:

1. The nurse logs into the Pyxis medication system and searches for a proprietary drug named Versed (generic name midazolam) that works as a sedative/anxiolytic. Important: all meds in the Pyxis are listed by generic name to avoid medication errors.
2. The nurse finds no such drug available in the Pyxis, but instead she does find a generic medication named vecuronium (proprietary name Norcuron) that is almost certainly the only medication listed that starts with a “V.”
3. The nurse overrides the Pyxis system THREE times in order to pull the incorrect medication.
4. The nurse opens the Pyxis drawer and takes the incorrect medication. She DOES NOT perform the UNIVERSALLY REQUIRED narcotic medication vial count for that Pyxis drawer. This is a vial count that anyone who regularly retrieves narcotic medications such as Versed, Fentanyl, Dialaudid, ketamine, morphine, Ativan, or oxycodone would absolutely without question know they would perform if they were collecting Versed from the Pyxis.
5. The nurse holds the incorrect medication vial in her hands and draws it into a syringe. The vial she holds in her hand not only is clearly labeled vecuronium and has a large bold red letter message that reads “Warning: paralyzing agent” across the medication label as well as the same “Warning: paralyzing agent” message inscribed around the rubber stopper through which she must pass the needle to draw the med into the syringe.. The metal seal the holds that rubber stopper in place is red, a feature only present on paralyzing agents. Red label coloration on medication vials is universally reserved for paralytics. Lastly, the vecuronium vial is made of clear glass.
The vial that the nurse should have had in her hand would have read midazolam (or Versed) and would be clearly identifiable by its brown UV protective glass and orange label. Orange label coloration on medication vials is universally reserved for sedatives, specifically benzodiazepines.
6. The nurse neglected to perform the standard medication label check before drawing her medication into the syringe.
7. The nurse injected the vecuronium, a rapidly acting paralytic agent, into the patient. Within two to three minutes, the patient lost all diaphragm control while maintaining complete consciousness throughout. In the next 3 to 10 minutes, the patient was asphyxiated leading to anoxic cardiac arrest.
8. The patient died as a direct result of both the nurse’s actions and inactions. The nurse overrode engineered safeguards and universally-accepted standard medication handling protocols directly leading to this patient’s death.

I guarantee you that this is not the first time that this nurse has performed these same overrides and protocol breeches, and it is also very unlikely that it is the first time that she has administered the wrong medication to a patient of hers.

Only she and God know if it this is the first patient she’s killed.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
97003 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:01 pm to
I’m not even sure if she would realize it if she killed a patient before. Sounds like she was not the sharpest knife in the drawer.


Not that the Vandy system shouldn’t have its arse in a sling for other reasons but she seemed negligent as hell here.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20681 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Criminal negligence charges should be used in cases where a potentially dangerous situation was known about, but left uncorrected resulting in injury or death. As the other poster said there are other methods to discipline those that had no intent to harm, but made a mistake. Revocation of professional license, civil lawsuits, etc. The punishment should be based on the intent of the action not the result.


But was that not the case here? Honestly don't know?

It seems to me that there were two major issues, please correct me if I'm wrong?

1.) Nurse egregiously searched, found, and administered the wrong drug. IMO she made two horrible errors here. One was pulling the wrong drug and assuming they were the same. Who the hell does that? Then the second was administering the wrong drug without asking someone first to confirm?

2.) Nurse failed to monitor the situation?

From the docs and RN's here, some are saying that if she was properly monitored and it was caught right away she may have lived? How quickly would it have been caught?
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20681 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:15 pm to
Also curious that the "student" didn't say anything? Seems to me some major red flags should have went up and any competent person watching that situation should have realized that errors were being made?

I'm not trying to place any blame on the student, simply surprised it wasn't witnessed and stopped.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30220 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:16 pm to
Trust the experts!
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20681 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

7. The nurse injected the vecuronium, a rapidly acting paralytic agent, into the patient. Within two to three minutes, the patient lost all diaphragm control while maintaining complete consciousness throughout. In the next 3 to 10 minutes, the patient was asphyxiated leading to anoxic cardiac arrest.


Are you saying that once it was administered, there was really no chance for the patient?

What is Vecuronium used correctly for?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96874 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

The nurse logs into the Pyxis medication system and searches for a proprietary drug named Versed (generic name midazolam) that works as a sedative/anxiolytic. Important: all meds in the Pyxis are listed by generic name to avoid medication errors.

quote:

3. The nurse overrides the Pyxis system THREE times in order to pull the incorrect medication.

Vandy is cringeworthy here too .
This post was edited on 3/29/22 at 4:26 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
97003 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:25 pm to
Wiki says it is used as part of intubation of a patient amongst other things.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
4946 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that once it was administered, there was really no chance for the patient?

What is Vecuronium used correctly for?


If recognized, someone could have masked the patient to support her until Sugammadex could have been given to reverse it.

Vecuronium, is routinely used as part of surgery to relax the patient. The airway is maintained with a breathing tube and the patient is monitored and supported the entire time.
Posted by Vamos Brandonos
Member since Mar 2022
1021 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:31 pm to
quote:


The driver texting or applying make up while driving knows their actions are increasing the risk of having a accident.


And not checking the label of a drug increases your risk of using the wrong drug. What's so complicated about that that you don't get it?
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101940 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

The prosecution comparing this to drunk driving is absurd. A drunk driver chose to drink, and then got behind a vehicle. That is knowingly putting someone in danger

The equivalent here is someone running a red light, and then saying they truly thought it was green. Would that person go to prison? I truly doubt it. They would be civilly liable and have other troubles like loss of license etc. Same that should have been done to this nurse


If as stated in this thread she made the choice to give the patient the wrong medicine simply because she couldn't find the correct one, I think the drunk driving comparison is pretty accurate.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20681 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Vecuronium, is routinely used as part of surgery to relax the patient. The airway is maintained with a breathing tube and the patient is monitored and supported the entire time.


So maybe she was given a bigger dose then normal due to assuming it was Versed? But Versed was powder right? SOOOO how the frick did she frick up the dosage?

ETA: I mean if it was a powder would that not have been in the directions given to her? As it was clearly her first time using Versed right? Would most people not have fricking asked that question?

So really, her not monitoring the situation closer was really what killed the patient? Seems like another reasonably competent Nurse in that situation may have been able to save the patients life?
This post was edited on 3/29/22 at 4:40 pm
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27072 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:52 pm to
Whole thing is fricked up. You don’t give someone versed and leave them in radiology. So from a protocol or policy. It’s wrong to begin with.

Much less Vecuronium. You give Vec and you put them on a ventilator. Period.

Some docs don’t like to give it. Because if you can’t tube, they are down. For 2 hours. That’s a lot of bagging.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17932 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:54 pm to
She walks vandy is a dirty whore when the onion is pealed back
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 5:11 pm to
nudes on reddit
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram