- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justice Roberts is an Embarrassment
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:12 pm to Diamondawg
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:12 pm to Diamondawg
Plessy was the law of the land for decades before Brown v Board of Education.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:19 pm to udtiger
quote:
If they back off this opinion, it will.
yes, the die might have already been cast
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:22 pm to teke184
quote:I knew I was stepping into. Just trying to offer an alternative thought. Oh well.
Plessy was the law of the land for decades before Brown v Board of Education.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:25 pm to Lsudx256
quote:
Reports are that he is trying to persuade another justice to back off their decision to overturn.
link or stfu
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:31 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:Red State
link or stfu
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:35 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
He must be afraid that this decision might tear the Republic apart.
The Republic is too weak to survive if can be torn apart over not being able to chop up tiny humans.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 7:51 pm to MMauler
quote:Now do social media in 1954.
Now do Plessy.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:34 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Now do social media in 1954.
What the f*ck does that have to do with overruling a 60-year-old case that had been decided 7-1.
Liberals are the ones who can’t defend RvW on its merits and strictly use the fact that the opinion was almost 50 years old and decided 7–2 to argue that RvW is some sort of liberal de facto Constitutional amendment that the current Supreme Court has no authority to overturn -- no matter how big of a steaming pile of dog sh!t it is.
One of the squad (I believe Tlaib) actually got on television the other day and said that the Supreme Court had no authority to overrule RvW. I believe there is a large part of the insane liberal population that actually believe that RvW is some sort of de facto Constitutional amendment. These insane f*cking freaks are brain-dead and brainwashed.
But you keep regurgitating their f*cking insanity. It looks good on you.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:38 pm to jimmarley
Not only that, but he effectively rewrote the law for ObamaCare which then enabled it to be passed. It’s unprecedented in almost every way yet hardly anyone talks about it.
And this was after Obama publicly shamed the court at the state of the union speech.
And this was after Obama publicly shamed the court at the state of the union speech.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:41 pm to Lsudx256
The draft opinion was just a draft. It's been puzzling to me how everybody is treating it like it's the final opinion of the Court.
IMHO, the final opinion of the Court will up-hold RvW.
We shall see.
IMHO, the final opinion of the Court will up-hold RvW.
We shall see.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:49 pm to Champagne
quote:
IMHO, the final opinion of the Court will up-hold RvW.
Wrong.
At best for the insane FILTH, Roberts may be able to extort Kavanaugh or Barrett to vote for passing on ruling on RvW and just uphold the Mississippi law (no abortions after 15 weeks). Roberts would write the opinion and just say that the RvW issue isn't before the Court and they can only overturn it when a complete ban on abortions is before the Court. I firmly believe that's what he was trying to do before the draft was leaked.
The liberal scum will be pissed, but not nearly as pissed in the case of the Court taking away their perceived de facto Constitutional amendment of RvW.
But, at this point, there is no f*cking way they can “uphold" RvW or Casey.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:49 pm to Lsudx256
Some rumors out there about his adopted kids.
I’m not saying it’s true, but the story goes that they are trafficked Irish children.
It may be why he decides what he decides.
I’m not saying it’s true, but the story goes that they are trafficked Irish children.
It may be why he decides what he decides.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:54 pm to Lsudx256
He proves he’s a compromised POS if he doesn’t side the majority.
Didn’t he puss out on the Obamacare decision because he thought the “people” should decide?
Well let the people decide on Row by sending it back to the states.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:55 pm to Lsudx256
quote:
Reports are that he is trying to persuade another justice to back off their decision to overturn
They're really going to change their minds about this aren't they? Holy shite.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:58 pm to Lsudx256
So Robert's is appalled at the leak of decision but he let's the cat out of the bag that he is trying to change a vote.
The leak is atrocious and disgusting, just as Robert's has said, but to try and change a vote is even more so.
I dont buy this report at all. This is a ploy by media to amp things up and pressure SCOTUS
The leak is atrocious and disgusting, just as Robert's has said, but to try and change a vote is even more so.
I dont buy this report at all. This is a ploy by media to amp things up and pressure SCOTUS
Posted on 5/8/22 at 8:59 pm to Evolved Simian
He was trying a horse trade. Protecting the past 15(?) week ban, in return for upholding Roe.
It was mentioned in the leak.
It was mentioned in the leak.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:05 pm to MMauler
quote:I think you just answered your own question. No one knows anything about any of this crap without social media. How many weeks did it take the population of the US in 1954 to even have a grasp of the Brown decision. What year did Thurgood Marshal get appointed to the court?
What the f*ck does that have to do with overruling a 60-year-old case that had been decided 7-1.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:09 pm to teke184
quote:The saddest thing about your post is that you probably think this is possible. Trump-level understanding of governmental instititions.
I would just wait until 2025 to toss him.
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 3:19 am
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:10 pm to jimmarley
quote:
Isn't he the one that cast the deciding vote on Obama Care?
Yes he is.
After everyone around him said he is rock solid on striking down this unconstitutional BS.
Then the deep state showed him all the evidence compromising him from his Epstein involvement (and who knows what else).
Magically he created a couple of pages of word salad to try and justify his flip on the decision.
Roberts is easily blackmailed and a liability to this Republic. He should be impeached and removed from the SCOTUS. Not that it would improve the shitshow, but the statement is factual.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 9:15 pm to The Boat
quote:Every important decision involves significant negotiation and horse-trading.
don't know much about the inner workings of judicial panels and all that crap but are other judges allowed to try to influence other judges or are decisions supposed to be reached individually?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News