Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Riverbend Station near New Roads/St. Francisville forced into emergency shut down

Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:46 am
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32121 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:46 am
quote:

Entergy's nuclear plant north of Baton Rouge was forced into temporary emergency shutdown

Entergy’s River Bend nuclear power plant near St. Francisville was forced into a temporary emergency shutdown over the weekend due to a technical issue, but was brought back online the following day, officials said.

The shutdown, known as a “SCRAM” incident and which saw control rods dropped into the plant’s reactor core to halt its nuclear reaction, occurred on Saturday.

“Shortly before midnight Friday, River Bend was raising power from 30 percent following a prior shutdown,” said Victor Dricks, spokesperson for the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

“Control room operators noticed a problem with the plant’s feedwater heating system, which preheats water before it is recirculated back into the reactor. Procedures required a manual shutdown so that plant safety parameters are not challenged. All control rods fully inserted with no complications and on Saturday the plant was completely shut down. The licensee was able to correct the feedwater issue and restarted on Sunday.”


quote:

The emergency shutdown occurred just six days after the NRC told Entergy officials that the River Bend plant will receive a notice of violation for failing to obtain an amendment to the reactor’s operating license before changing its internal rules for how to supply emergency cooling water to the plant in the event of a major accident.

According to the NRC violation notice, Entergy’s license requires it to have a 30-day cooling capacity available in the event of a major accident. That 30-day capacity must be enough for the accident to be evaluated and corrective action to be taken.

In March, testing during refueling of the River Bend reactor found that leakage in a standby system providing reactor cooling water was significant enough to render the heat sink system inoperable, in part because it would require additional water after 22 days. There were no actual consequences to the reactor or to public health from that incident, either.



LINK
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 8:54 am
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53118 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:47 am to
Plant operators are as bad as teachers these days
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120393 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:49 am to
Your title is misleading

Makes it seem like a meltdown is impending this morning
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
4862 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Plant operators are as bad as teachers these days


Kind of seems like they nailed this one...
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32121 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:55 am to
Yeah they seem to have done the right thing here given the circumstances. There is an issue and they are fixing it.

Still a bit sketchy when an reactor near a populated area has cooling water issues.
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 9:03 am
Posted by boddagetta
Moulton
Member since Mar 2011
9999 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:06 am to
quote:

cooling water issues


Doesn't appear there is a cooling water inventory issue. It was a failure to submit the license amendment.

quote:

An alternative supply is available to replenish water in the heat sink, but that option was never added to the plant’s license, NRC officials found during an inspection of the plant that ended on Sept. 30. The issue does not represent an immediate safety threat, Dricks said.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85133 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:25 am to
SCRAMs are pretty routine in the nuclear industry. There are so many safety and procedure requirements that even a simple temp value that’s too close to threshold will cause one. And that’s how you want it. They’re most common in start ups after turnarounds. It’s not really a big deal. Neither is the licensing violation. It’s a paperwork technicality that’ll be fixed. Every area of the plant is audited constantly. Engineering, operations, cyber security. Observations, minor violations, and non-cited violations are just a part of the nuclear world. Issues are found then immediately addressed. This story is nothing.
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
18878 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Plant operators are as bad as teachers these days
So a plant operator diddled your wife, huh? Wanna tell us about it?
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43222 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:30 am to
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3019 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:30 am to
This doesn’t even look like a SCRAM it looks like a normal shutdown (with the scram switch being flipped at the end vs. in response to an “oh shiiite” moment).
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83400 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:32 am to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85133 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:38 am to
It was a SCRAM in that it halted the started up process. No. It was not an “oh shite” moment. Most SCRAMs happen just like the article describes. Some safety or important-to-safety system isn’t behaving as it should so they shut down and fix it. And at no point is the plant at risk of a disaster.
Posted by Bigfishchoupique
Member since Jul 2017
8460 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 10:10 am to
Homer could handle it.
Posted by RC
Member since Apr 2009
957 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 10:57 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram