Started By
Message

re: Ozempic maker Novo Nordisk surges past Tesla with market value of $566B

Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 am to
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64376 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Would you be in favor of doing something with the costs similar to a deductible or donut hole? Let's say a patient wants ozempic, okay, pay 100% of the costs until ____ is met. Then pay 80% until ____ is met. Then pay 60 % so on and so on with continued coverage based on positive outcomes, no intolerances, no allergic reactions or severe side effects? You could also incentive patients to receive more coverage for the drug costs with in rage lab results (CMP, CBC, Lipid profile and A1C done quarterly) and in control BP results for quarterly visits with their PCP. Wouldn't this incentives people learn about, introduce and implement a healthier lifestyle rather than starting with the prescription? Distancing from big pharma is a necessity in this country. Becoming more dependent on it is just accepting a loss.



Dude I wasn’t arguing against or for anything . Just stating that after almost 20 years in the medical field people are exceedingly ignorant to their health, even in affluent areas. If you’re participating in a thread online about ozempic you likely care more than 99 percent of the population.

As a physical therapist in a hospital I’m constantly in shock about how even the most seemingly obvious information regarding activity, diet, exercise, etc is completely unknown to the general population.

What is being discussed as healthy on places like here compared to the general populace (even extremely productive successful members of it) are light years apart.

It would need to start with some kind of test of the emergency system on every phone in America alerting as to what is actually healthy
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 11:41 am
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1019 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:48 am to
quote:

So let me get this right, this "miracle" drug works when people stop eating shitty food, overeating, and drinking alcohol? Who knew


Yes.

It's truly wild. I guess people don't realize they can eat less food for free.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53963 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:50 am to
I didnt say or think you were arguing, I was only posing an alternative to "there's no way that can be done"

I do agree, there is alot of confusion and misinformation and my only point is that alot of work can be done on the forefront before we start people on high cost medications.

We have room for improvement on both sides for sure but the answer is not "well people just won't get healthy because they don't know how sop lets just give as many people as possible this magic diet pill and keep our fingers crossed." (a bit hyperbolic, I know)
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
3557 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:50 am to
Has the halitosis been discussed yet ITT?
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:53 am to
What an awesome thread. Probably the majority of the people bashing people taking this are on a cocktail of blood pressure meds, heart meds, anxiety, etc.

The OT
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
3557 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:53 am to
quote:

It would need to start with some kind of test of the emergency system on every phone in America alerting as to what is actually healthy


They wouldn’t pay attention. We need ozempic because the government won’t restrict ebt usage to healthy foods. shite. The government doesn’t even know what food is “healthy”.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20300 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Find a compounding pharmacy, they'll sell it $200-400 for a month's supply. Or go to Los Algodones in Mexico, for that peice it's a 3 month's supply. Just know how to spot fakes.


I just checked Ozempic’s price on Express Scripts and it’s $125 for a 3 month supply. Where do you people get your information? Sheesh
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20300 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

A healthy diet, exercise, mental health, addressing other social determinants of health should be the minimum standard and what's done first.


How old are you? This has been the message to patients from doctors since the 80’s and obesity rates continued to rise drastically.

So your plan didn’t work for most of the population and our healthcare system regressed because of it
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10503 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Why does it matter to you?


It really doesn’t matter to me

Just commenting on a message board
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53963 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:37 pm to
A message isn't a plan but you're right, the plan of leaning on big pharma has failed dramatically.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31441 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:39 pm to
well the plan of telling people to just eat less and move more has too and its not because it isnt the correct advice it is but it falls on deaf ears

people dont know how or want to learn to

track calories
prioritize protein
track steps
progressive resistance training 2-3x per week

sorry as much as i would love for everyone to do that...not happening.

so what another solution to help people to do that?

this medicine
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53963 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

well the plan of telling people to just eat less and move more has too and its not because it isnt the correct advice it is but it falls on deaf ears


I agree...the issue is patient non compliance. The burden of healthcare needs to shift more back to the patient. So, if a patient wants the medicine they can pay for it.

The mentality of I won't do ___ but I want ____ because I am not doing _____ but expecting someone else to pay for it is insanity.

Imagine how frequent Z91.1x would be coded if non compliance was a suitable diagnoses to treat non compliance pharmaceutically.
Posted by Long Ball Larry
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2021
1401 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:02 pm to
ICD-10 code Z91.1 for Patient's noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen is a medical classification.

TIL
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53963 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:13 pm to
Yes, I understand.

I think maybe I poorly worded that, let me try it another way.

If we're going to say Z91.1 is a reason to justify pharmaceutical treatment at the expense of the healthcare system wouldn't it make more sense to allow those dollars to be spent on the compliant patients?

We're increasing the dollars spent on patients who don't want to what their primary care physician instructs them to do. Want to take ozempic and you're non compliant, okay...pay for it. Want to take ozempic and you're compliant, why do you need ozempic? Do the meds need asdjusting? Is your A1c in range? Are you on a statin?

The default here to increase spending on the non compliant is madness and is costing billions of dollars a year with no long term improvements because the issue isn't diabetes or weight loss, it's wasting too much money and resources on the non compliant who have zero desire to be compliant or accept the financial burdens of their non compliance.
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
58667 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

If we're going to say Z91.1 is a reason to justify pharmaceutical treatment at the expense of the healthcare system wouldn't it make more sense to allow those dollars to be spent on the compliant patients?
You do realize the majority of healthcare would fall under this non compliance coding, right? I work in nephrology, 95 % of our patient load would not qualify for medical care under your terms. It’s just not feasible. Hell, 9/10 people would get turned away from the ER under those terms.

The system is frickED, there’s no denying that. But why is it okay for person 1, the non compliant diabetic with a BP of 190/110, to get the care he needs at no additional cost but person 2 shouldn’t get his ozempic filled because that is going to break the system… nahh those GLPs are a drop in the bucket compared to the millions wasted in healthcare on a daily basis.

Maybe some people will get the GLPs and still eat and drink like shite. But I’d be willing to bet over half will change their habits completely and hopefully avoid the predicament person 1 is in above. I believe some plans are already requiring a minimum % of weight loss during certain time frames while on the med, which is fine IMO.


quote:

wasting too much money and resources on the non compliant who have zero desire to be compliant or accept the financial burdens of their non compliance.
Again, this is happening every single minute of the day already. It’s happening in front of my eyes as I type this. It’s not something we can stop but maybe GLPs can slow it down. It’s definitely worth a shot because the current path isn’t sustainable.
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 1:30 pm
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53963 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

But why is it okay for person 1, the non compliant diabetic with a BP of 190/110, to get the care he needs at no additional cost but person 2 shouldn’t get his ozempic filled because that is going to break the system


It isn't, that's the point. But Ozempic isn't going to break the system, non compliant patients and a fee for service payment based on services provided not outcomes system will and has. it's ripe for abuse and overuse without enough emphasis opn patient accountability and healthier patients.

There's tons of waste for sure and I don't think it's an either or fix. It's going to take alot of different approaches and a shift in how people think about healthcare and how much burden of responsibility they're willing to accept themselves.

Not too much longer we will have more seniors than kids for the first time in our nations history and we just don't have enough providers to handle the patient load. The model will shift more into the patients home and more into the patients responsibility. If the default is "well, they're non compliant and unhealthy so there's nothing I can do except put them on high cost meds" is the answer without implementing a plan based on patient outcomes and improved health conditions we might as well keep a democrat in the white house for the next 20 years.
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 1:33 pm
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53963 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

because the current path isn’t sustainable.


I agree. It isn't working but yet again, it's the default.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40191 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you a difference between a diabetic being on a statin and an overweight person with an a1c of 7.2 being on ozempic to lose weight. Right?

I mean, right?


As a physician who prescribes has been prescribing GLP-1s like Ozempic to diabetics since 2019, I can tell you that you are not getting it paid for if the hemoglobin A1C is 7.2%. I filled out 4 PAs for GLP-1s this week. One was BCBS, United, Humana, and the other was Medicaid. In order to get a GLP-1 like Ozempic (~$1000 per month) paid for you have to have documentation that the patient has maxed out or failed metformin (< $10 per month on GoodRx), maxed out or failed or could not tolerate a sulfonylurea urea like glimiperide (also < $10 per month on GoodRx), maxed out, failed, or could not tolerate a SGLT-2 inhibitor like Jardiance (~$500 per month on GoodRx), and the patient's hemoglobin A1C is still greater than 8.5% despite being on 3 diabetic medicines. Like I said I have been prescribing GLP-1s since 2019 and I have never gotten a GLP-1 paid for as monotherapy for diabetes let alone obesity. In order to get Wegovy (the weight loss version of semaglutide) paid for you have to submit documentation that includes at least 3 months worth of exercise logs, meal logs, and documentation that they have failed or could not tolerate cheaper medications like Adipex ($10-$20 per month on GoodRx). As a PCP I have never gotten semaglutide paid for using a diagnosis of obesity.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40191 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

without enough emphasis opn patient accountability and healthier patients.


In all due respect. You are talking out of your arse! It costs around $1000 per month. Trust me. Insurance companies are holding patients accountable. Hell Novo Nordisk even offers health coaches to the patients prescribed Ozempic. The compliance data is available to the insurance companies. If a patient does not use the Novo Nordisk health coach then the doctor gets a request for more documentation from the prescribing provider asking for proof that the patient met with nutritionist or dietician and their hemoglobin A1C is improving.

Also I have seen many cases where a noncompliant diabetic and obese patient (what the OT would call a Fatty McLazyass) get put on Ozempic and they lose 10 pounds or so in the first 2-3 months. All of sudden something clicks in their brain and their behavior starts to change. I saw a patient today who I started on Ozempic last year. Dude was the definition of a Fatty McLazzyass. He did not give a shite about his health. He was 26 had a BMI of 58 and hemoglobin A1C of 13.7%. He was on 3 blood pressure medications and it was only borderline controlled. He was so obese that he was getting disability payments just because of his weight and the fact that he could barely walk. He blamed his obesity on the fact that his whole family was fat, had always been fat, and just accepted the fact that he was going to need an amputation of one leg or both and be on dialysis by age 50. After he started losing weight and Ozempic did away with his appetite between meals he realized that he did not have to stay fat. He started really paying attention to what the nutritionist was telling him, joined a gym, hired a personal trainer and has lost over a 120 lbs. He is still obese but his BMI is down into the 40s and his blood pressure is now controlled with only an ARB which I am keeping him on for the renal and cardio protective benefits as much as for blood pressure effects. He has come off insulin and his A1C was 6.2% today. Oh and he is no longer on disability and medicaid because he now has a job with health insurance. His story is also a lot more common than you would think especially among younger diabetics which is the population group to target to lower the rate at which health care costs are increasing.
Posted by miketiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
1676 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 9:49 pm to
Started Mounjaro 4 weeks ago. Started at 216 and now I am 198. 4.5 pounds a week. Changed diet and continued my daily walking and exersizing. Don't have cravings for snacks after eating protein and vegies. Drink a lot of protein drinks also. Less craving for my strawberry margarita's also. No side affects so far either.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram