Started By
Message

re: Oakland to offer A's a new 5 year lease extension

Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:07 pm to
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71502 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:07 pm to
Ownership has consistently been dog shite.
Posted by OhioLSUfan
Columbus, OH
Member since Oct 2007
1291 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:16 pm to
Whether it’s the fans, stadium , or ownership- it’s just an embarrassment to have a team in Oakland. 5k fans in attendance yesterday on an opening weekend Saturday. They need to get that team out of Oakland asap. Staying there does nothing for anyone.
Posted by West Seattle Dude
West Sesttle
Member since Aug 2023
128 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:26 pm to
II use to go to A’s games in the 80s & 90s. It was a dump then, but the Athletics were winning with a star-studded roster and drawing well. The Coliseum was built primarily for the Raiders.
Posted by oldtrucker
Marianna, Fl
Member since Apr 2013
1609 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:26 pm to
I'd watch them in Vegas, sorry not coming to Oakland
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7599 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

And that is proof that the history follows the franchise, and doesn't stay in the city.


true for the most part.

one exception being that Cleveland claims the history of the old Browns (now the Ravens) and Baltimore's history began in 1996.
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
5321 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

one exception being that Cleveland claims the history of the old Browns (now the Ravens) and Baltimore's history began in 1996.




Hornets
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
17359 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 4:12 pm to
There's no way they accept that. The team was offering far less than that. Oakland should tell them to get the hell out now, and lose a chunk of that $67M a year in TV money.
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4471 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 4:20 pm to
I remember reading something that the A's are reported to make $65 million (or thereabouts) this year from their TV broadcasting rights, and something like $70 million next year. However, if the A's don't play their home games in the Bay area the TV network has the right to renegotiate the deal. If the A's can't make a deal with Oakland to stay until the LV stadium is complete, Sacramento and Salt Lake being the leading candidates.

Basically, if the A's don't play in Oakland until they move to Las Vegas, ownership will lose tens of millions of dollars.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25879 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

There's retired Expos #s up in Nationals Park.


The Nats are pretty weird when it comes to claiming history. They fly WS flags that the old Washington Senators (now the Twins) won because it was a “DC championship,” or something to that effect.
This post was edited on 4/5/24 at 5:29 pm
Posted by LsuNav
Sacramento
Member since Mar 2008
1391 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 4:52 pm to
Among their requests, they are asking for a consideration to sell the team and allow it to stay in Oakland.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34826 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 4:58 pm to
The A's haven't had a decent owner since Connie Mack.
Even though they won 3 Series under Charlie Finlay, he was universally despised.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
17359 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 5:32 pm to
Kaval already said a long time the name of the team isn't changing.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
11330 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

The Nats are pretty weird when it comes to claiming previous history. They fly WS flags that the old Washington Senators (now the Twins) won because it was a “DC championship,” or something to that effect.
Yeah they need to decide if they want the history of the franchise or the history of the city.

But they claim both plus the Homestead Grays - old negro league team.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
11330 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Hornets
The Sonics history is staying in Seattle as well, but I can't think of an MLB example, minus the Expos/Nats/DC thing, which is unique because Selig was trying so hard to get the Expos into DC.
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
19853 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 7:13 pm to
Can you read??
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79349 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 11:05 pm to
With their crowd size lately, they should seek out a HS field
Posted by tccdc
Washington, DC
Member since Sep 2007
3599 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 6:51 am to
LINK /

LINK

They have the fans, their fan fest this year draws more than their games. They are not giving Fisher their money.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29264 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 7:17 am to
quote:

The Coliseum was built primarily for the Raiders.


It actually worked better for the A’s until the Raiders returned from L.A. and they built that stupid Mt. Davis structure.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10676 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 8:39 am to
The A's have been longer in Oakland than in Philadelphia. They adopted the Green and Gold colors in Kansas City. They were historically blue and white. I think they keep the A's name and colors but if they switched back to blue and white it would be fine.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14350 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 8:39 am to
Oakland and Seattle. Two cautionary tales of taking their pro franchises for granted and watching them walk away.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram