For the MTG fans

Antisemitic is anything that doesn't favor Jews. So I guess she is correct. The real question is why antisemitic is something that is scary. Nobody ever worried about it being anti-christian to not fund Ukraine.

That being said, I don't want to fund Ukraine in their border dispute.

Also, they SHOULD be separate bills. This bullshite of mega legislation that funds the military as well as transgender bathrooms and glory hole cleanliness, chicken insurance and gorilla insurance subsidies has GOT to end.

quote:

---

it's anti American to throw money away on foreign wars.

---

It should be in our best interests not to give money, but unfortunately it’s very American.

quote:

---

it's anti American to throw money away on foreign wars.

---

It appears to be as American as apple pie actually.

quote:

---

This bullshite of mega legislation that funds the military as well as transgender bathrooms and glory hole cleanliness, chicken insurance and gorilla insurance subsidies has GOT to end.

---

And the reason they do this is because they know if a senator votes against it the press the next day will not state he was against glory hole funding it will be "HE HATES AMERICA HE WONT FUND THE MILITARY".

Just like tomorrow instead of saying MTG is against this "bundling" this board will state MTG JUST CALLED JEWS NAZIS SHE IS AN IDIOT.

quote:

---

Marjorie Taylor Green

---

Trailer Swift

quote:

---

it's anti American to throw money away on foreign wars.

---

It can't be Anti-American if there is no America.

You're living in an illusion. It's all smoke and mirrors the country was sold off long ago to the highest bidder.

quote:

---

This woman is insane

---

Insane would be voting for the same people that screw over America over and over again.


That’s you.

I have no problem with separate bills. Ukraine and Isreal funding are two different issues.

quote:

---

I could die happy if we were to adopt a constitutional amendment requiring single issue legislation which specifically eliminates anything resembling 'earmarks'.

---

I completely agree with the sentiment, but if you consider the logistics of voting for every item that comes along, including committee meetings to bring it to a committee vote, hashing it out, bringing it to the house, debating it, sending back to committee for changes, back to the house, debate, vote and pass to the Senate for approval, repeat, rinse, repeat, back to the house for change approval, debate, vote, etc., etc., etc., then consider their breaks, other committee assignments, vacations, campaigning, fund-raising, time spent in the district, time spent as part of a committee taking testimony for various matters, time meeting with government leaders, DoD, other agencies, national security matters, etc., then not many spending bills could be addressed.

There has to be some significant amount of consolidation of budgeting done because of the unwieldy size of our government.