Sperm donor sued for child support

State governments have a bias towards allowing that kind of bullshite, because it saves them money on welfare benefits. It's a very fricked up invasion of contract.

ETA: If I recall correctly, the "loophole" is that child support is deemed paid to the child, not the mother. As such, the mother can't contract away the child's right to receive support from their biological father.

Did he contract with her directly or did he donate to a sperm bank?

Another "strong and independent" modern woman who needs a man's money to raise a child.

quote:

---

Does anyone know what legal loophole she is getting him with?

---

I may get some of the details wrong, but there was a story a few years ago where a guy responded to a Craigslist ad from a lesbian couple looking for a sperm donor. He didn't have sex with either woman, just gave them his "donation" and they had some sort of agreement signed and all. Then later they sued him for child support and won. Had he gone through a legit sperm bank, he'd have been in the clear. But because it wasn't done through a licensed facility, he had no legal protection from the mother coming after him for child support.

Looks legit and totally true

quote:

---

Absolutely insane that someone ask for the sperm, then sues you for your willingness to help with fertility and wham get sued for thousands.

---

Any time a woman opens her legs and doesn't require protection then she is asking for the sperm.

Any time you bust a nut inside a woman you're willingly helping with fertility.

If he were required to pay child support I'd imagine he'd have rights to the child. No way all this isn't covered legally in the application process.