- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who’s in the wrong? Police cruiser vs. ATV
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:55 pm to CleverUserName
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:55 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Uhh. It’s clear on the video. He parked diagonally across the lanes.
There was enough room for him to get around the cop in the right lane if he weren't driving at such a high speed.
2
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:55 pm to eatpie
A speeding atv that was there illegally that the cop was told to go investigate and make sure the public was safe from the idiots.
Mission accomplished.
Give the man a medal and let the cop haters cry about it.
Mission accomplished.
Give the man a medal and let the cop haters cry about it.
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:57 pm to jchamil
quote:
There was enough room for him to get around the cop in the right lane if he weren't driving at such a high speed.
Bingo
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:57 pm to roadGator
“BuT wHaTs ThE LaW?!?”
Dude is taking a huge L on this glorious Friday
Multiple L’s to be exact
Dude is taking a huge L on this glorious Friday
Multiple L’s to be exact
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:58 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
Look Ma!!! Another hypothetical that doesn’t make sense!!!
Asking what the law is a hypothetical??
quote:
WE ARENT POLICE OFFICERS YOU frickING CLOWN!!!!
Soooo a police officer is not bound to any laws while on duty?
Posted on 5/3/24 at 12:59 pm to jchamil
quote:
There was enough room for him to get around the cop in the right lane if he weren't driving at such a high speed.
Based on what evidence?
We have went from “He didn't block both lanes!! Can you not see?!?” To “well he had a few feet!!!”
Progress.
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:01 pm to roadGator
I am against police chases except in circumstances of immediate danger.
We've had cops kill innocent people b/c they were chasing a shoplifter, we've had cops hit an innocent family and kill the father b/c they were a chasing a car thief.
Those chases were unnecessary, and were ridiculous.
In this case, we had an idiot who clearly was posing an immediate threat to other people on the jogging path. He also was unable to drive worth a shite, as the cop left him enough room to stop or go around. Given his piss-poor abilities it is very likely he would've hit someone up the path.
The cop was obviously hoping he would stop, or go around, as no one likes taking a chance on getting injured in a wreck.
The officer did exactly the right thing.
We've had cops kill innocent people b/c they were chasing a shoplifter, we've had cops hit an innocent family and kill the father b/c they were a chasing a car thief.
Those chases were unnecessary, and were ridiculous.
In this case, we had an idiot who clearly was posing an immediate threat to other people on the jogging path. He also was unable to drive worth a shite, as the cop left him enough room to stop or go around. Given his piss-poor abilities it is very likely he would've hit someone up the path.
The cop was obviously hoping he would stop, or go around, as no one likes taking a chance on getting injured in a wreck.
The officer did exactly the right thing.
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:01 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
You apparently have absolutely NOT read my first posts
I sure did. You said
quote:
Yes the ATV was in the wrong by being on the walking-bike path. There should have been consequences.
Followed by 7 (no exaggeration) paragraphs of bullshite and stupid hypotheticals to try to paint this officer as the at fault party. Then 4 PAGES (again, no exaggeration) worth of back and forth of you trying to un-justify (not even sure this is a word but I’m goin with it) the officer’s actions. You are a clown
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:03 pm to TheRouxGuru
When they have to resort to making shite up it’s time for them to stop.
And don’t even entertain the stupid hypotheticals.
And he keeps asking about a law.
It would likely be a police policy on how to handle stupid fricks illegally operating atvs.
But those policies would be pointless when trying to save lives. Judgement calls would be taken into emergency situations
Unless the argumentative goof is saying there should be a law on how to handle idiots breaking the law on atvs on pedestrian and bike trails while traveling at a high rate of speed on trails with blind spots and people with baby strollers.
Maybe the legislature can get right on that and prosecute this evil cop.
Pure idiocy
And don’t even entertain the stupid hypotheticals.
And he keeps asking about a law.
It would likely be a police policy on how to handle stupid fricks illegally operating atvs.
But those policies would be pointless when trying to save lives. Judgement calls would be taken into emergency situations
Unless the argumentative goof is saying there should be a law on how to handle idiots breaking the law on atvs on pedestrian and bike trails while traveling at a high rate of speed on trails with blind spots and people with baby strollers.
Maybe the legislature can get right on that and prosecute this evil cop.
Pure idiocy
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:04 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
CleverUserName
It’s time to pack it up and head out bro. You’re getting absolutely WORKED in this thread
It’s okay to be wrong my guy. Just admit it and move on. You’re way off here, sorry
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:05 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Since when is “well this was likely to happen” ever stood up in court?
When someone is convicted of reckless conduct?
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:06 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
We have went from “He didn't block both lanes!! Can you not see?!?” To “well he had a few feet!!!”
I did? Where?
quote:
Based on what evidence?
My eyes that I can see the video with. I can see how wide the road is and how long a car is
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:06 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Asking what the law is a hypothetical??
No it isn’t, but that’s not what you said you disingenuous prick. You said ‘IF that were you or me’
NOT A HYPOTHETICAL
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:06 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Soooo a police officer is not bound to any laws while on duty?
Dude, I have no dog in this fight. But as a favor to you, just letting you know. When I read every single one of your posts, I literally cringe.
Friendly advice, log off for the day and maybe come back on Monday when you've had a chance to compose yourself. No offense, seriously. I just doubt you realize how deep you've gotten into sounding, ummm, kinda mentally challenged?
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:08 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
Followed by 7 (no exaggeration) paragraphs of bullshite and stupid hypotheticals to try to paint this officer as the at fault party
No I didn’t. Not paint him the at fault party. No where.. no how have I tried to lay the blame solely on the cop. And I have shown multiple examples of what would be considered good to some people, even life saving, but still not legal.
All I’m asking if it is legal if it were you or me that blocked this guy.. based on what we saw as possible danger.. and seriously injured this guy… would it have been lawful?
I see a lot of emotion rage… but so far… not a clear answer.
Based on the emotion rage.. this should be a clear cut “here’s the law”.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:12 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
All I’m asking if it is legal if it were you or me that blocked this guy.. based on what we saw as possible danger.. and seriously injured this guy… would it have been lawful?
It wasn't any of us though. It was an on duty police officer.
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:12 pm to jchamil
quote:
I can see how wide the road is and how long a car is
No kidding? What time in the video does it show the dimensions of the car and the space in the rear?
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:14 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
I see a lot of emotion rage… but so far… not a clear answer.
Because this whole board has fricking united to try to explain how fricking retarded you are. Literally EVERYONE here has been trying to explain how far off you are ITT, but you won’t fricking listen. All of your hypotheticals and all of the examples you try to get someone to explain are completely irrelevant because they aren’t the same situation. Not even fricking close. I’m not even going to try to entertain your bullshite or try to explain laws or policies to you for a NUMBER of reasons.
Take off your ‘I’m always right on the internet’ glasses and look at this shite from a common sense POV (that’s the first thing you asked for in this thread, remember?)
This cop more than likely saved innocent lives. frick whatever laws or policies are on the books. The guy deserves to be commended for his quick thinking and successful actions, not to be called out by pencil neck retards like you on the internet. Go frick yourself (check the laws first to make sure you can jack off on Fridays)
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:14 pm to jchamil
quote:
It wasn't any of us though. It was an on duty police officer.
So we have two sets of laws?
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:14 pm to Festus
How ya been, Festus?
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News