Started By
Message

re: Russia discovers 511B barrels of oil in British Antarctica

Posted on 5/12/24 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131478 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

The Moon?


it's mostly gasses.

Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42822 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

We also should have been building more refineries and fewer wind/solar "farms".

Those wind farms will be part of the 'crazy house' displays of the kid's park in the future controlled by China/Russia/Iran.

Laughing stock for the rest of eternity.
Posted by FriedEggBowL
MS
Member since Nov 2021
479 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:13 pm to
That'll knock the price of oil down
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18500 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:25 pm to
The beeper don’t beep no more.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
7931 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Yo professor Numbnuts I have been in the oil and gas industry for 40 years. I have dealt with and been friends with geologists, geophysics, petrophiscist, and paleontologist. Was involved on the exploration and production side or upstream side.


Thanks to that line I read this in this guy's voice

Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20622 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

We also should have been building more refineries and fewer wind/solar "farms".


We should be focusing on nuclear power for our energy needs.
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Malibu
Member since Sep 2013
29185 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:16 pm to
I don’t care how many F350’s the oil Baws buy. Drill baby drill.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124575 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

At least there's no one there to complain about being colonized.



Well, aside from the Nazis
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124575 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

I mean, they'd frick Russia up in a conventional war. I hope you're not implying Russia has a claim.








How? By having one more aircraft carrier and less of everything else?

Head to head I just don't see it

Posted by au7342
Member since May 2020
196 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

I would imagine that the Aliens living in that secret underground base where the UFO's come from will not take kindly to people coming that close to them.


They might think the drill bit is an attempt to give 'em an anal probe.

This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19717 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

We also should have been building more refineries and fewer wind/solar "farms".


Yeah, I wonder how many new refineries could have been built for all of the waste on "green" junk.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37162 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:53 pm to
Russia will have no concens with environmental issues with drilling there.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40191 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

This is supposed to be protected land, but my guess is democracy or communism is coming really fast in the freezing desert.


That’s going to be tough to extract and get to market. Russia has the ice breakers to get the oil out but the UK has the naval power to blockade the area and keep Russian ships out.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39679 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

I mean, they'd frick Russia up in a conventional war

The population of the UK is not much bigger than Ukraine. Russia would beat them without significant help for the UK by the USA.
Posted by Carbonman
Butte la Rose
Member since May 2022
584 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

I gotta think the price all would have to get to 200$/barrels to make drilling and producing oil out of Antarctica economically feasible


If oil was $200/barrel we would need to go to Antarctica. Also if we used our abundant natural gas we could be completely independent.
Posted by au7342
Member since May 2020
196 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

The population of the UK is not much bigger than Ukraine. Russia would beat them without significant help for the UK by the USA.


Wouldn't be an attack on the UK, it would be an attack on NATO.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39679 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Wouldn't be an attack on the UK, it would be an attack on NATO.
True. It's all hypothetical. No one is attacking a nuclear power.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9254 posts
Posted on 5/14/24 at 10:57 am to
Meanwhile, here in America our government is more concerned about trans rights!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram