Started By
Message

Ghostbusters: Afterlife Rotten Tomatoes Score Is Out

Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:46 am
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
35156 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:46 am
LINK

quote:

Ghostbusters: Afterlife opens in theaters on Friday, but reviews for the eagerly-anticipated film have begun to roll out which means we're starting to get an idea of what critics think about the latest chapter in the beloved franchise. Now, the Rotten Tomatoes score for Ghostbusters: Afterlife is out and while the film isn't in "rotten" status, the critical response isn't overwhelmingly positive either. The film is, at the time of this article's writing, sitting at 67 percent positive on the review aggregator, the number reflecting mixed feelings about the film from critics.

One of the things that stands out from the reviews posted to the site is that the film seems to lean into efforts to please "hardcore" fans of the Ghostbusters franchise - and depending on how you feel about that, that's a criticism that is either a charming aspect of the film or a major problem. There are also some criticisms that the film isn't especially funny, something that ComicBook.com's Spencer Perry noted in his own review of the film. Perry ultimately gave Ghostbusters: Afterlife a 2 out of 5 rating.

"Beyond simply being a carbon copy of the two pillars of the franchise in terms of structure, Ghostbusters: Afterlife makes the shocking decision to largely strip humor out of the series entirely," Perry wrote. "There are certainly some gags and jokes, but it's not a laugh a minute. It's not an inherently comedic tone throughout, and the one thing it doesn't borrow from the original is not taking its premise to task for being complicated and silly."
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 8:48 am
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6099 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:48 am to
quote:

shocking decision to largely strip humor out of the series entirely



Isn't that kind of the new normal in Hollywood? Strange they have a problem with it now.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:49 am to
quote:

One of the things that stands out from the reviews posted to the site is that the film seems to lean into efforts to please "hardcore" fans of the Ghostbusters franchise - and depending on how you feel about that, that's a criticism that is either a charming aspect of the film or a major problem. There are also some criticisms that the film isn't especially funny

Exactly what post-boomer Ghostbuster fans wanted. If you were introduced to it as a kid, the original wasn't the flat out comedy that the rest of us saw.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 8:51 am to
quote:

shocking decision to largely strip humor out of the series entirely
quote:

Isn't that kind of the new normal in Hollywood? Strange they have a problem with it now.
The Hollywood SOP is to take a classic and pump in enough humor to keep it from being compared on an even field to the original.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
86585 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:05 am to
lol frick them dont care about reviews they stopped being relevant...well..since forever.

trailer looks entertaining and i'm taking my 7yo to see it opening night.

quote:

the film seems to lean into efforts to please "hardcore" fans of the Ghostbusters franchise


OH NO! FOR frickS SAKE NOT THAT!!!!! lets redo it with a bunch of unlikable fat women and give it a 100/100 rotten tomatoes review!
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 9:08 am
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
21917 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:08 am to
I generally don't give two hoots about anything coming out of Hollywood these days, or of the opinions of movie reviewers. I will say though that I have been looking forward to this one. I absolutely loved Ghostbusters when I was a kid. I loved the movie. I loved the cartoon. I was a Ghostbuster for three Halloweens in a row. I had all of the toys. In other words, it was a gigantic part of my childhood from about 1985 to 1989. So, this will be pure nostalgia for me. I hope that the movie will be great. If I leave disappointed, oh well. I'll survive.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 9:10 am
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
37886 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:11 am to
quote:

If you were introduced to it as a kid, the original wasn't the flat out comedy that the rest of us saw.


i mean, when you compare it to Stripes, Caddyshack, NL Vacation, Beverly Hills Cop, etc., the comedic tone of Ghostbusters ('84) kinda falls short of those movies, imo. i feel like the comedy behind the movie goes over a lot of kids heads. you have to be an adult to get the references. it wasn't until the early-mid '00s i understood the "menstration" reference in the library scene when i was "coming of age".

as a kid, i was more attracted towards special effects and the fantasy of being able to catch ghosts. it kinda takes the real life fear of ghosts away from a kid when they can imagine being able to shoot one with a laser beam and capturing it.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
62894 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Exactly what post-boomer Ghostbuster fans wanted. If you were introduced to it as a kid, the original wasn't the flat out comedy that the rest of us saw.



Yep. Completely agree. Seemed like a really serious movie for me as a kid, then I had a friend describe it to me as a "comedy" later in life. It's not an SNL skit.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 9:14 am
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
37886 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Yep. Completely agree. Seemed like a really serious movie for me as a kid, then I had a friend describe it to me as a "comedy" later in life.


it's more of an action movie with comedic relief than it is a straight up comedy.

explosions and bright flashing lights? what's not to love about that when you're a kid?
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:22 am to
quote:

it's more of an action movie with comedic relief than it is a straight up comedy.
Every moment of the original has comedic overtones (if you're an adult). Even Dana's "death" is handled with humor ("Smells like barbecued dog hair. Oh, Venkman! Oh, Venkman, I'm sorry!")

If you're introduced to it as a kid, it's a semi-serious adventure film for life.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
153607 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:22 am to
I always thought GB was a comedy, or at least an action one that was funny, as you mentioned. But it was always funny to me when I was younger, even if some of the jokes went over my head.
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Member since Sep 2012
25227 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:46 am to
I read that the movie has a CGI Harold Ramis which is just gross.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
21917 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:47 am to
quote:

i feel like the comedy behind the movie goes over a lot of kids heads.


Oh, hell yeah it did. I watched that movie a thousand times when I was a kid. Now when I see it as an adult, I think "Jesus...I wonder what my parents thought about the menstruation thing and the ghost BJ scenes?"

Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:50 am to
quote:

If you're introduced to it as a kid, it's a semi-serious adventure film for life.



This is what I have thought all along. For Millennials, Zoomers, and perhaps really young Xers (those under 10 in 1984), their idea of Ghostbusters is heavily influenced by the spooky special effects. The dry-as-a-desert humor was lost on them. Even if they get the humor now, their nostalgia is more about the ghosts and proton packs.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 9:57 am to
quote:

This is what I have thought all along. For Millennials, Zoomers, and perhaps really young Xers (those under 10 in 1984), their idea of Ghostbusters is heavily influenced by the spooky special effects. The dry-as-a-desert humor was lost on them. Even if they get the humor now, their nostalgia is more about the ghosts and proton packs.

My grandson was introduced to it at 4 and considers it a documentary. A few years later and he discusses Venkman like I discuss Winston Churchill.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
24336 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:14 am to
The original wasn't a comedy, it had dry humor. The all women one was a poor attempt at making it a comedy. I'm optimistic reading that.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
37886 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:17 am to
quote:

I read that the movie has a CGI Harold Ramis which is just gross.


skinny or fat harold ramis? that makes a difference.



Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
60193 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:26 am to
quote:

There are also some criticisms that the film isn't especially funny,
It doesn't look very funny. All I saw in the trailer were bad CGI sight gags and Paul Rudd who, while not un-funny, is the comedy equivalent of a wine spritzer.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
60193 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:35 am to
quote:

it's more of an action movie with comedic relief than it is a straight up comedy.

Huh? The original was inspired by Harold Ramis watching poltergeist and wondering where the hell A family would find "ghost detectives" to come and "fix" their problem. Ramis envisioned them as being like a bunch of plumbers or pest control guys. I don't think a minute goes by in the movie without some kind of joke or gag.

It's not what you say it is just because you were a kid when you saw it and didn't get most of the jokes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram