- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like the LSU girl who did the GIRLSDOPORN video MIGHT be getting paid after all....
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:40 am to Anaximander
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:40 am to Anaximander
quote:
but their lawyer said some of them were drunk at the time and didn’t understand what they were reading."
Yikes
0
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
quote:
who don't want to be in internet porn
Yet knowingly agreed to get paid to frick a stranger on camera. You only get so much plausible deniability.
They were naive and dumb, but that doesn't mean the producers are innocent due to their coercion or whatever legal terms they are using and shouldn't pay.
What if it isn't for money and a girl agrees to bang on camera - but just for the guy's private collection? Just because she was naive and dumb, does that give the dude the right to post on pornhub without any repercussions?
Consider the phone scammers calling grandma or some family member and saying you are in Mexican jail and she has to wire money for your bail.
Is grandma or whoever naive and dumb - yes?
Is the scammer still guilty of fraud and should be punished / pay restitution if possible - also yes.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:42 am to Anaximander
quote:
the Orleans CDC is a civil court with no connection to probation?
I spent a year going to Orleans Criminal District Court every week to piss in a cup for probation.
Often called 'CDC' at Tulane and Broad aka Da Old Parish Prison
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:43 am to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
What if it isn't for money and a girl agrees to bang on camera - but just for the guy's private collection? Just because she was naive and dumb, does that give the dude the right to post on pornhub without any repercussions?
It wasn't that, so irrelevant question is irrelevant.
Your whole post is basically a strawman, because I said none of what you imply I did.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:44 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:44 am to Anaximander
quote:
their lawyer said some of them were drunk at the time and didn’t understand what they were reading."
if a lawyer's lips are moving in a court room that means he's/she's lying, would be impossible to prove at that point anyhow
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:44 am to SuperSaint
quote:
I spent a year going to Orleans Criminal District Court every week to piss in a cup for probation.
Often called 'CDC' at Tulane and Broad aka Da Old Parish Prison
Fair enough. I usually hear local attorneys use the CDC for civil and say criminal court for the other.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
quote:
What if it isn't for money and a girl agrees to bang on camera - but just for the guy's private collection? Just because she was naive and dumb, does that give the dude the right to post on pornhub without any repercussions?
It wasn't that, so irrelevant question is irrelevant.
No, it gets to the heart of the matter. Pornography is only allowed for its stated and intended purposes - if it is used in another manner, the producer / distributor / whatever can and should face legal repercussions.
The only issue with the case is if the contracts were valid or if they were impacted by coercion or some other legal bullshite.
quote:
Your whole post is basically a strawman, because I said none of what you imply I did.
I didn't imply you did anything - I raised questions that were analogous to the current issue but try to reduce the contention in the heart of the argument so that people may consider seeing it from a different angle (although that doesn't actually happen on the internet but I'm ok with that).
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:48 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:46 am to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
They were naive and dumb, but that doesn't mean the producers are innocent due to their coercion or whatever legal terms they are using and shouldn't pay.
What if it isn't for money and a girl agrees to bang on camera - but just for the guy's private collection? Just because she was naive and dumb, does that give the dude the right to post on pornhub without any repercussions?
Consider the phone scammers calling grandma or some family member and saying you are in Mexican jail and she has to wire money for your bail.
Is grandma or whoever naive and dumb - yes?
Is the scammer still guilty of fraud and should be punished / pay restitution if possible - also yes.
This was not naive and dumb, They were not trolling the street looking for these women. These women made a decision to travel across the country to get paid by a stranger to allow another stranger to put his penis into them and get filmed doing it. When you have to fly across country to do this it is not a snap decision. You have time to think about it before you get on the plane.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:48 am to MMauler
The blonde girl was incredibly hot. What a tight little body. She got rammed.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:48 am to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
No, it gets to the heart of the matter.
No it doesn't. You asked me a question about something that didn't happen in this case in an attempt at a gotcha.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:49 am to Anaximander
quote:
hese women made a decision to travel across the country to get paid by a stranger to allow another stranger to put his penis into them and get filmed doing it.
It started out by contacting them for "modeling" work, not pornography - their online recruiting website didn't have shite to do with porn / GDP.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:50 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
quote:
No, it gets to the heart of the matter.
No it doesn't. You asked me a question about something that didn't happen in this case in an attempt at a gotcha.
You are projecting my intentions. I was trying to present a different angle, i'm not looking for internet points with a gotcha
One situation was used to imply that pornography is only allowed for its stated and intended person.
The other was used to imply that the people being naive doesn't preclude the producers from being liable or whatever term I should be using.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:52 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:50 am to The Boat
Girl needs to bleach her butthole
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:50 am to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
You are projecting my intentions. I was trying to present a different angle, i'm not looking for internet points with a gotcha
Then don't put words in my mouth and let's talk about what actually happened here.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:50 am to The Boat
quote:
The blonde girl was incredibly hot. What a tight little body. She got rammed.
a friend of mine is intrigued by this and would like to know if this is still available for online viewing
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:51 am to Sneaky__Sally
h
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:54 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:52 am to 777Tiger
Top post on this page.
ETA: Last page.
ETA: Last page.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:53 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:52 am to Eighteen
quote:
gdp e290 "beautiful intelligent brunette"
quote:
other LSU chick is gdp e242
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:52 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Then don't put words in my mouth and let's talk about what actually happened here.
I didn't put words in your mouth - I made analogies and was asking your opinion on those situations and if they differ from this situation in your opinion.
ETA: if you want to talk about what happened, i also said this on the last page.
Pornography is only allowed for its stated and intended purposes - if it is used in another manner, the producer / distributor / whatever can and should face legal repercussions.
The only issue with the case is if the contracts were valid or if they were impacted by coercion or some other legal bull shite.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 10:56 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 10:59 am to Cosmo
The use of a condom was a little off putting.
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News