- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

U.S. Air Force to allow longer braids, ponytails, bangs for women
Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:07 am
Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:07 am

quote:
ARLINGTON, Virginia — As an outcome of the 101st Air Force uniform board, Air Force women will be able to wear their hair in up to two braids or a single ponytail with bulk not exceeding the width of the head and length not extending below a horizontal line running between the top of each sleeve inseam at the underarm through the shoulder blades. In addition, women’s bangs may now touch their eyebrows, but not cover their eyes.
These new changes will be effective upon publication of the new standards in Air Force Instruction 36-2903 in February.
More:Woman dedicates military career to father who died tragically
“As I outlined in Action Order A: Airmen, this decision is a commitment to supporting the Airmen We Need and sustaining the culture and environment of excellence that will continue to make the Air Force an attractive career choice for Airmen and families,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr. “I’m thankful for the feedback and research conducted from a number of women leaders, the Women’s Initiative Team, the Air Force uniform board, and our joint teammates.”
LINK
Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:09 am to FLTech
Is there a safety reason for short hair that this impedes?
Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:11 am to FLTech
cue women that will never be in the air force but will scream about this sexist rule
Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:11 am to FLTech
quote:Awful. Not only does the standard change with the fit of the shirt but you can't even tell without asking the female to remove her blouse. Have fun with that.
not extending below a horizontal line running between the top of each sleeve inseam at the underarm through the shoulder blades.

Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:13 am to FLTech
The length would be fine with me. I was a 1SG of an all male combat arms company in the Army so I never had to deal with that.
But for years these women hairstyles have started impeding normal, within regulation wear of headgear. I would have lost my mind if I wasn't in the Combat Arm of Decision.
ETA: better to have it a little longer rather than piled on top of your head and causing your headgear to look absolutely out of regulation.
But for years these women hairstyles have started impeding normal, within regulation wear of headgear. I would have lost my mind if I wasn't in the Combat Arm of Decision.
ETA: better to have it a little longer rather than piled on top of your head and causing your headgear to look absolutely out of regulation.
This post was edited on 3/19/21 at 10:21 am
Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:19 am to El Segundo Guy
quote:Yeah, we've all seen the kevlar perched precariously atop three feet of braids.
But for years these women hairstyles have started impeding normal, within regulation wear of headgear

Posted on 3/19/21 at 10:22 am to northshorebamaman
quote:
Awful. Not only does the standard change with the fit of the shirt but you can't even tell without asking the female to remove her blouse. Have fun with that.
I'm willing to inspect. For the good of the country, of course.
Popular
Back to top
